Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: #3Fan
[#3Fan] It's easier to just read the Constitution and the Constitution said the Congress can decide how a state proves it's act.

What the Constitution says is:

U.S. Const, Art 4, Sec 1, Cl 2:
And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

The general law passed on May 26, 1790 says, "Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the acts of the legislatures of the several states shall be authenticated by having the seal of their respective states affixed thereto: That the records and judicial proceedings of the courts of any state, shall be proved or admitted in any other court within the United States, by the attestation of the clerk, and the seal of the court annexed, if there be a seal, together with a certificate of the judge, chief justice, or presiding magistrate, as the case may be, that the said attestation is in due form."

The Congress did decide how the legislative act of a state is proved.

By choosing adopt your own interpretation of the Constitution, and to ignore legal authorities, the relevant act of Congress, and the relevant decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, you have left yourself as lost as Jessica Lynch navigating in the desert.

252 posted on 03/02/2004 3:20:14 AM PST by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]


To: nolu chan
What the Constitution says is: U.S. Const, Art 4, Sec 1, Cl 2: And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof. The general law passed on May 26, 1790 says, "Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the acts of the legislatures of the several states shall be authenticated by having the seal of their respective states affixed thereto: That the records and judicial proceedings of the courts of any state, shall be proved or admitted in any other court within the United States, by the attestation of the clerk, and the seal of the court annexed, if there be a seal, together with a certificate of the judge, chief justice, or presiding magistrate, as the case may be, that the said attestation is in due form."

The Constitution says the Congress may enact laws for states to prove their acts and the effect thereof. There was no limit on the number of laws and the fact that secession would have effects other than, say, marriage means that the South broke the law when they wouldn't allow the Congress to do as the Constitution allowed it.

The Congress did decide how the legislative act of a state is proved.

There was no limit on the number of laws and the fact that secession would've had different effects than, say, marriages means that the South broke the law when they wouldn't allow the Congress to prescribe laws for secession.

By choosing adopt your own interpretation of the Constitution, and to ignore legal authorities, the relevant act of Congress, and the relevant decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, you have left yourself as lost as Jessica Lynch navigating in the desert.

In other words, you are saying to not read the Constitution but to go by what someone else says it says. Sorry, the the accurate way to know what the Constitution says is to simply read it first hand and it says that the Congress can prescribe laws and determine the effect thereof.

261 posted on 03/02/2004 5:33:17 AM PST by #3Fan (Kerry to POW-MIA activists: "You'll wish you'd never been born.". Link on my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

To: nolu chan
Still no link to a signed armistice. Does the signed armistice exist or doesn't it?
266 posted on 03/02/2004 5:40:08 AM PST by #3Fan (Kerry to POW-MIA activists: "You'll wish you'd never been born.". Link on my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

To: nolu chan
By choosing adopt your own interpretation of the Constitution, and to ignore legal authorities, the relevant act of Congress, and the relevant decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, you have left yourself as lost as Jessica Lynch navigating in the desert.

...that just about sums up the entire latter half of this thread so far as the pet lunatic is involved!

309 posted on 03/02/2004 8:52:40 AM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson