I've never followed you to any thread.
Anyway, to make a long story short I made subsequent reference to his abusive and hypocritical whining to the site administrators, which he followed up by claiming that he had not made the complaint.
I didn't make a complaint when your first post was removed, I don't know who did. After you repeatedly falsely accuse me of crimes I began to have your posts removed when they would do it.
That quickly turned out to be a lie because (a) the same event occurred within moments of his return to this thread after I again referenced the apparently "forbidden verb," and (b) nolu_chan found him a couple days later on another completely unrelated thread attempting to post complaints about my use of the same "forbidden verb" there. He's literally like the fat kid on the gradeschool playground who doesn't have any friends and spends recess every day throwing mud at other kids and calling them names because he knows that he's fat and they aren't. Sure enough, somebody finally turns the table on him and says "look fatty, the reason nobody likes you is because you're so obnoxious to everybody else and because you do nothing but throw mud at them and call them names day after day after day." And the second that happens he runs to the teacher whining about how everyone else is being mean to him.Oh well, as the old saying goes, if you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen.
You pinged the moderator on Silas so maybe you should take your own advice.
Odd. The #3pet lunatic apparently believes that (a) no reason exists to alert the moderators to the return of a known disrupter who has been previously banned over a dozen times under equally many pseudonyms, and (b) that doing so while simultaneously noting his clicker-happy abuse of the abuse button is somehow contradictory. By that same illogic, I suppose it would be wrong for to alert the police of an armed robbery in progress since I have previously complained about their exceedingly high propensity to dispense parking tickets.