I have been pretty temperate, considering that you've displayed a stubbornness in your ranting on Article IV that would make a mule blush. It is laughable that you think I can't win an argument when no serious attempt to support any argument has been made by you. You post wild assertions which have no bearing on the debate at hand, then flame away like a child and stomp your feet, repeating the unsupported assertions which got you into trouble in the first place.
You go so far as to post links that evidence the exact opposite of what you state (like a trite historian's summation of the Texas secession convention), and refer to them as though there was anything within said "documentation" which could be interpreted by the most twisted logician to support anything you've said.
We treat people with respect who show the same kindness toward us. We accept the notion of authority, and have cited from several (the founders, the constitutional conventions, the SCOTUS) in support of our argument. We do not accept that #3fan had #3epiphany and is anything more than a #3rdratearmchairconstitutionalscholar.
you're on a roll.
btw, i could NOT care less what you think of me PERSONALLY, but i do resent your INTENTIONALLY insensitive/racist comments about our tribe's customs/traditions & your OPEN disrespect for the "older & more traditional members" of the group.
my prophesy about your lack of presence on FR will likely come true & soon.
free dixie,sw