Posted on 02/25/2004 11:52:26 AM PST by 4CJ
He popped in for a few posts and was whooshed away again.
I'm sure gonna miss him. (sniff...)
Very convenient when "loyalty" is redefined to mean complete agreement with the incumbent.
Do you not see the attribution of the quote to Lucy Shelton Stewart? The post was made to Partisan because she was his (non)source for a discussion topic a few weeks ago (and, come to think of it, almost everything else it appears).
Learn to read, learn not to lie. It will take you far.
Use the word 'union' on a WBTS thread and be surprised when I associate it with the GAR. What a job you are.
Another instance where use of my imagination was required, no doubt.
Let's come to an understanding of terms.
There is a hierarchy of levels in the law, many of which we never deal with.
The highest level is sovereign acts, the kind that can be reviewed only by Who Am. These are acts of will by the Sovereign, who in England is the King or Queen.
The next level is constitutional and treaty law. They are made by the Sovereign and obeyed voluntarily by the Sovereign. They can also be broken by the Sovereign, by sovereign acts.
Under the Constitution is statutory law passed by the Government created by the Constitution.
Beneath that is regulation lawfully created by bodies created by statute and reviewed by them -- by e.g. administrative law judges and inspectors general.
And below that, there are other rules and guidelines that lawyers and regulators can describe in better detail than I.
My point here is that under the logic of subsidiarity, a creature of the Constitution, i.e. the United States Government or its branches (Supreme Court, Congress, President) cannot review an act above its pay grade, i.e. above its level of competence. When the People sit in convention assembled, they take up the rods and axes of the Sovereign and become not objects of government but take on their awful aspect of Sovereign, and in that capacity, the People answer to nobody who isn't God Himself. Capiche?.
Responding to GOP, it says, precisely that -YOUR SOURCE- Lucy Shelton Stewart said that Republicanism was on crooked knee to the KKK is such states as Maine, New York and Indiana. Lucy Shelton Stewart said it, you goofy bleating foal, you curdled staggering mutant dwarf smeared richly with the effluvia and offal accompanying your alleged birth into this world. An insensate, blinking calf, meaningful to nobody, abandoned by the puke-drooling, giggling beasts who sired you and who then killed themselves in recognition of what they had done.
Gradually the newspapers are revealing this close connection between Republicanism and the Klan in the North: in such States as Maine, New York, and Indiana the influence is profound.
-- Lucy Shelton Stewart, The Reward of Patriotism, 1930, p. 449.
Soooo ripe for response.
#422 [#3Fan] Military ships that travel close to land need arms. The Vikings had arms,
#423 [#3Fan] All I can do is repeat that military ships that travel close to shore do indeed have arms. Vikings, Vietnam, and the Spaniards all had arms.
Gradually the newspapers are revealing this close connection between Republicanism and the Klan in the North: in such States as Maine, New York, and Indiana the influence is profound.
-- Lucy Shelton Stewart, The Reward of Patriotism, 1930, p. 449.
All Democrats and anyone not overtly loyal to the evil race-hustling pimp Lincoln, rapist of the Constitution, was considered "suspicious-acting."
[#3Fan] As the bible says, law-abiding people have no reason to fear His sanctioned powers that be, but His sanctioned powers that be are a terror to the law-breaking.
In #3World, He appeared in the form of Spoons Butler. No wonder you are such a mess, #3. You worship an image of Spoons Butler.
There's no need to go easy on him ;o)
He lied out both sides of his mouth, instigated war, failed to convene a special session of congress in a timely manner, called up troops illegally, authorized expenditures without congressional approval, jailed dissidents for having the audacity to disagree with the warmonger, suspended habeas corpus, refused to abide by decisions of the federal court system, threatened to jail the Chief Justice for failing to agree with Lincoln's interpretation of the Constitution, instituted a policy of waging war on innocent women & children, &c, &c.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.