[FairOpinion]

Just read the posts here and you will see that people do indeed want to see Bush defeated, cutting off their nose, to spite their face, sell out their country to the Democrats, because Bush is not accomodating their little pet agendas.

[MEG33]

Keep your eye on the goal.The goal is to win this election.

I am not trying to win an argument,I just want to win an election.Listing the policies,votes and past words and action of John Kerry always reminds me of what we are fighting.

Some posters here always vote third party,some want to be heard on their issues.Some just love to argue and inflame.The goal is for George Bush to be reelected.

[RightOnline]

Well now............don't be so hasty, and don't denigrate the legitimate concerns held by some by labeling them "their little pet agendas". Not only is that condescending, it also shows that you are jumping to the rash assumption that those with such concerns would rather see a John Kerry in the White House than Bush. That is utterly ludicrous.

[billbears]

Bush is not accomodating their little pet agendas

First time I've heard adhering to the limitations within the Constitution and smaller government called 'little pet agendas'. Of course this doesn't cover amnesty, pill bills, and myriad of other 'agendas' that don't fit conservative policy. You know, at one time, the Republican party had a lot of conservatives. Now it seems it just has a lot of Republicans