To: Howlin
What's even more ironic is that the very ones who have sneered at us and called us Locksteppers, incapable of thinking on our own, are now demanding that on these issues, we -- er.....um....march in lockstep with them........LOL. Actually, we're pointing out the irony here. I've never seen you criticize this administration - so I find it...interesting...that the first time you choose to do so is when he adopts a stance in agreement with conservatives. One of three conclusions might be drawn:
1. You're so invested in online arguments that you'd sacrifice your beliefs to assure you "beat" your online opponents.
2. You don't believe conservative policy actually works, hence the reason you're worried about enacting it.
3. You're legitimately distressed by conservatism.
I don't pretend to know which it is, but no other possible reason exists.
To: NittanyLion
Is this truly the only GWB policy that you feel is conservative enough for you to support?
571 posted on
02/28/2004 7:58:15 AM PST by
EllaMinnow
(The best days of America lie ahead GWB 2/23/04)
To: NittanyLion; Howlin
Actually, we're pointing out the irony here. I've never seen you criticize this administration - so I find it...interesting... I guess this explains why you seem to follow her posts from thread to thread so much
And yes .. it is noticeable
577 posted on
02/28/2004 9:42:51 AM PST by
Mo1
(THE CUSTER CONSERVATIVES: "Not Smart... But Principled, Dammit!)
To: NittanyLion; Howlin
I think what she means is that Pres. Bush shouldn't lower himself to pander to knuckleheads on the right.
578 posted on
02/28/2004 9:45:20 AM PST by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: NittanyLion; Howlin; My2Cents; redlipstick; doodlelady; Mo1
594 posted on
02/28/2004 12:16:49 PM PST by
Tamzee
(The Democrat Party...... Kerrying water for Communism since 1971)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson