[jammer]

In actuality, you and the rest of the pack are nothing more than opportunists trying to claim you're in the forefront of conservative thought.

In "actuality", we are not only at the forefront--we're probably the only conservatives on here. If you are not enraged by this President's domestic actions, then you are either have no principles, are dishonest about those principles, or your principles are not conservative. The situation in Washington has deteriorated beyond the point of the low intelligence level of some of Bush's defenders being a defense.

You claim it but you use DNC talking points. In a way, you and the clowder are much like Alcibiades in both outlook and action.

That's an ad hominem argument. Debate the points that are made.

Besides, your argument is wrong. I hear no DNC people complaining that Bush has proposed preposterous spending increases, that we should have no Medicare drug bill, that Bush should veto the AWB, that we should have no CFR, etc. In fact, Bush's defenders on these issues sound more like DNC than we do. No, you can call names, but they don't register except to the willfully blind.

[gatorbait]

Jammer, your screenname is good advice,jam it. You and the rest of the unappeasables have howled your Cassandry choruses for months. I've heard about all the insults to the President and to me and those others who have defended the president,. Know what? AWB is actually popular with most of the American People. Know why? Because militia loving idiots have not made the case that the ban is a waste of time;instead,they've exacerbated the problem. No, instead, you carp and bitch and do absolutely nothing. Feel like you've been called a name ? Too bad,I've been on the receiving end of several including some from your box mate.

You no more represent mainstream conservatism than Ralph Nader does.Fact is ,you and your ilk are closer intellectually with the Deaniacs and Naderites than you are with conservatism.

Frankly,I see no point in further dialogue with you as ,in reality, you've shown me you cannot think past groupthink, something another semi-malcontent loves to accuse the President's defenders of doing. We have nothing further to discuss.

Cordially,

[BigSkyFreeper]

Why should he veto the AWB? You don't need to defend yourself and your family or go sport hunting with even a fully-auto weapon anyway. If you get between a bear and it's cub, that's your quandry.