To: Sabertooth
So you go from "gotcha game" to the claim I am posing a "false dilemna" - no, Sabertooth, it is not.
Answer the question:
Who divides the party, is it the candidate whose position is in disagreement with a plank but wins a nomination DESPITE that or is the divisive influence those who lose the nomination battle but refuse to support the nominee?
Why is it that when certain questions are asked you dodge them with bullcrap claims of a "gotcha game" or "false dilemna"? Are you afraid that your efforts to impose an immigration litmus test might be set back? Or are you waiting for Michelle Malkin to come up with the answer for you? You seem to parrot some of her comments quite well.
367 posted on
02/23/2004 11:57:29 AM PST by
hchutch
("I never get involved with my own life. It's too much trouble." - Michael Garibaldi)
To: hchutch
So you go from "gotcha game" to the claim I am posing a "false dilemna" - no, Sabertooth, it is not.
Since it's already pretty clear that you don't know what a straw man is, it's not surprising your ability recognize a false dilemma extends just as far. I gave you my definition of what is divisive. Why is it that when certain questions are asked you dodge them with bullcrap claims of a "gotcha game" or "false dilemna"?
It's not a game; you are not an especially crisp thinker, nor are your arguments clear, consistent, or well constructed. You post fallacy after fallacy, and no one is under any obligation to take them seriously. Here, do some homework.
|
368 posted on
02/23/2004 12:06:23 PM PST by
Sabertooth
(Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson