Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth; NittanyLion
I wasn't, until I saw Freepers getting attacked on this thread by some of these "folks". Why are YOU so eager to confront people on a thread when you missed parts of a conversation and can't possibly know everything that was said?

Errr, no... that's not revisionist. Not that it's any of your business, but NittanyLion was confronting me and I was pointing out that he was assuming he knew all aspects of the conversation when he clearly doesn't. And, yes, there were several nasty remarks on this thread that have now been deleted... it is due to those nasty remarks that I made my personal comments. As a matter of fact, I use the abuse button extremely rarely here and last night I hit it on one of the posts on this thread directed at another Freeper.

341 posted on 02/23/2004 10:59:11 AM PST by Tamzee (Hey, Bush supporting lurkers! Create an account and speak up! This is a critical year for the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]


To: Tamsey
Errr, no... that's not revisionist.

Sure it is. Here's your first post on the thread:


To: FairOpinion
Guess Which Candidate Our Enemies Want to Lose in 2004?

Newhouse News Service ^ | Feb. 11, 2004 | JAMES LILEKS


Let's just be blunt: The North Koreans would love to see John Kerry win the election. The mullahs of Iran would love it. The Syrian Ba'athists would sigh with relief. Every enemy of America would take great satisfaction if the electorate rejects the Bush doctrine and scuttles back to hide under the U.N. Security Council's table. It's a hard question, but the right one: Which candidate does our enemy want to lose? George W. Bush.

And some conservatives will be happy to help, it seems.

Woe and gloom have befallen some on the right. Bush has failed to act according to The Reagan Ideal.

The actual Reagan may have issued an amnesty for illegals, but the Ideal Reagan would have done no such thing. So unless Bush packs freight cars full of gardeners and dishwashers and dumps them off at the Mexican border, some voters will just sit this one out.

The Ideal Reagan would have eliminated the National Endowment for the Arts; the actual Reagan proposed a $1 million increase in his final budget. But Bush increased NEA funding -- perhaps an attempt to placate people who wouldn't vote for him if he showed up in performance with Karen Finley and a can of Hershey's syrup. So angry conservatives might just sit this one out.

And if a Democrat takes office, and the Michael Moores and Rob Reiners and Martin Sheens crowd the airwaves on Nov. 3 to shout their howls of vindication? If the inevitable renaissance of Iraq happens on Kerry's watch, and the economy truly picks up steam in the first few years before the business cycle and Kerry's tax hikes kick in? If emboldened Islamist terrorists smell blood and strike again? Fine. Maybe the next Republican president will do everything they want.

Oh, sure, Bush is fine on the foreign affairs stuff, and yes, there's a partial-birth abortion law, and the tax cuts were nice, and come to think of it, Sept. 11 wasn't followed by blow after blow after blow, for some reason. The nation endures, at least at press time. But that's hardly enough. Where's that bill requiring 60-foot Ten Commandments monuments in every capitol rotunda? Let Kerry win. Teach the GOP a lesson, it will.

continued... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1080687/posts


68 posted on 02/22/2004 9:05:54 PM PST by Tamsey (Hey, Bush supporting lurkers! Create an account and speak up! This is a critical year for the USA!)

You and your side came to this thread ready to flame. Now you're complianing you got singed.


345 posted on 02/23/2004 11:11:33 AM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson