[FairOpinion]

When I see numbers like this at FR, a conservative website, I think it's cause for concern:

If it's Kerry vs Bush how will you vote?

Bush
3,781 votes - 78%

Kerry
186 votes - 3%

Libertarian
206 votes - 4%

Const Party
286 votes - 5%

Other
43 votes - 0%

Sit it out
134 votes - 2%

Undecided
171 votes - 3%

4,807 votes total;

[jammer]

I think it's cause for concern:

So does everyone, especially the White House. Hence the article that you posted.

[Cold Heat]

Actually, it has not changed much since I first started lurking here.

The numbers were not as bad as I thought.

This is a opinionated bunch. They have issues, but are usually pretty smart in the end.

Just like the American public.

What worries me about this election, is that the public prefers to spread the power around.

They do not like one party controlling all.

I do not know how that fact will translate in the election though. If I did, I would be rich.

[JohnnyZ]

When I see numbers like this at FR, a conservative website, I think it's cause for concern:

LOL, I don't think it's cause for concern! Given the makeup of FR, the Constitution and Libertarian totals are amazingly low. And only 176 Kerry votes from the 1,000 trolls we've had recently is another minor miracle. No, while many are dissatisfied about certain things, I think pretty much anyone on here who would consider voting Republican will go with Bush in 2004.

[NittanyLion]

When I see numbers like this at FR, a conservative website, I think it's cause for concern:

Based upon their actions as of late, so does the White House. The moral of the story is that holding politicians accountable for their actions gets results. Reflexively defending all decisions on the part of a politician merely encourages them to advocate someone else's position, since the message sent is that you'll automatically adopt that person's position to continue your defense of the politician.