Skip to comments.
The Paradox of Unified Control–How Conservatives Can Win Without Bush
Vanity
| 1/31/2004
| Self
Posted on 01/31/2004 3:07:29 PM PST by Kevin Curry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 1,961-1,963 next last
To: Texasforever
Some people ask: What if it is the "will of the people" to abandon the constitution? Well the answer is very simple. Matter of fact, that is exactly how we got our constitution.
We had a constitutional convention and the WILL OF THE PEOPLE was respected.
It is apparent that our present President does not want to represent the will of the people, which is why he is losing in the polls. In this country if you don't represent our will, guess what, you don't get our vote. If in addition to that you actively act against our will, and refuse to secure our borders during a time of war, you get crushed in the election, because people don't even go out to vote at all and YOU lose the congress. YOU mister President, it is you not US who will lose, and throw away our opportunity.
261
posted on
01/31/2004 10:36:07 PM PST
by
TomasUSMC
(from tomasUSMC FIGHT FOR THE LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE)
To: Texasforever; Kevin Curry
In 2000 Kevin Curry was NOT the Kevin Curry who is now all over FR posting this stuff.
I have NO idea what has happened to the Kevin Curry I used to know.
To: Texasforever
I wish some of these so called "treu" conservatives would get down off their high horse and quit spending their time whining on this forum like spoiled brats and send their complaints to theie elected officials. The blame lies with Congress, Lindsey Graham siad it best tonight, he said: "The republicans have controlled congress for ten years now and it seems we have become fond of spending money"
263
posted on
01/31/2004 10:39:47 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(VOTE CONSTITUTION PARTY IF YOU WANT A DEMOCRAT)
To: MJY1288
The neener neener contingent rears its empty head.
264
posted on
01/31/2004 10:39:55 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines a conservative. (writer 33
)
To: Kevin Curry
Who are YOU and what has happened to the Kevin Curry I used to know ?
To: tpaine
Yuck Foo Tar hole
266
posted on
01/31/2004 10:41:12 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(VOTE CONSTITUTION PARTY IF YOU WANT A DEMOCRAT)
To: NYCVirago
When Clinton won in 1992, he won thanks to conservatives who thought Bush I was not conservative enough, and voted for Perot.
No, Clinton won because G. H. W. Bush was a lackluster president, ran an abysmal campaign, and took his base for granted. Let's hope G. W. Bush gets it right. I still have hope for him.
267
posted on
01/31/2004 10:41:47 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: MJY1288
LOL .. Can I steal that?
268
posted on
01/31/2004 10:41:55 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: Mo1
Sure, be sure to check out the properties
269
posted on
01/31/2004 10:42:45 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(VOTE CONSTITUTION PARTY IF YOU WANT A DEMOCRAT)
To: TomasUSMC
You lack even a high school level understanding of American government. The President is the ONLY elected official chosen nationwide to "represent the entire country" not just the 20% of the temper tantrum throwing arrested development fringes on both ends of the political spectrum.
To: My2Cents
Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check
As far as I'm concerned, the jury's still out on that one. I thought he was going to support the Marriage Amendment in the SOTU speech, but he soft-peddled. Remember, the RNC has cozied up to the homo-patrol on occasion...
271
posted on
01/31/2004 10:45:15 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: Kevin Curry
A Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee will NEVER give her a ticket to the SCOTUS ball. What makes you think the Senate will remain Republican if Bush loses? His popularity enabled him to get the Republicans the Senate back in 2002; if he is voted out, the Senate could very well become Democrat-controlled again.
To: CMAC51
BRAVO.
273
posted on
01/31/2004 10:46:41 PM PST
by
DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
(Four hours is too long for a Democrat to sit in the Oval Office, let alone four years. Vote W '04)
To: nopardons
From what I've read in your posts, you haven't a clue; not even one, regarding politics.
You sure have a way with words. Your insults have succeeded in converting me to your point of view. Maybe you should try it on a street corner sometime:
"Hey idiot, vote for Bush!"
274
posted on
01/31/2004 10:47:16 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: gatorbait; Sandy
Kevin Curry:
His sycophants--his ever-approving geek chorus--are next to worthless in terms of shaping the debate.
______________________________________
Hear, hear! Very well stated. Damn, you've been on a roll lately, Kevin. Wish I had time to read this whole thread.
176 Sandy
______________________________________
I'll condense it for you. waaaaah Bush betrayed us, Vote for the Democrats, life will be better, A read meat conservative will clean up.. We should be punished for our sins.waaaaaaaaaaaah..
See, no need to read the screed now.
258 Gatorbaitor
Sandy is one of the good people, baitor... Leave her be.
275
posted on
01/31/2004 10:47:19 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines a conservative. (writer 33
)
To: MJY1288
I did and I'm still laughing .. Thanks
276
posted on
01/31/2004 10:48:41 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: nopardons
He grew up.
277
posted on
01/31/2004 10:48:50 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines a conservative. (writer 33
)
To: MJY1288
No sense of humor either, I see..
278
posted on
01/31/2004 10:50:24 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines a conservative. (writer 33
)
To: MJY1288
The title of this pile of horse hockey should be Why Bush will win without Kevin Kurry and the other pouting pitchforkers"Personally, I would rather walk with the pitchforkers, than ride in the limo with the two party elites.
What was it Buchanan said about two years ago?
"The differences between the two beltway parties are inconsequential".
These two parties have been backslapping each other and bumping belly's for so many years, they've simply merged. Even Ray Charles can see this.
It's nothing but good cop bad cop. Like phony pro-wrestler's throwing each other around in the ring, and afterwards, drinking at the bar together having a good ol belly laugh.
Thankfully, most are becoming wise to this DC sham, and the beltway elite.
279
posted on
01/31/2004 10:51:06 PM PST
by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: tpaine
No, he's been taken over by a pod person.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 1,961-1,963 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson