Replies

What makes this kind of news doubly hard --- there was just this on Jan 2 ---- this past Friday:

Vets' drug bills may soar

Dale Eisman
The Virginian-Pilot
WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration is considering dramatic increases in the fees military retirees pay for prescription drugs, a step that would roll back a benefit extended just 30 months ago and could alienate an important Republican constituency at the dawn of the 2004 campaign season.

The move would affect thousands of El Paso area veterans.

Pentagon budget documents indicate retirees may be asked to pay $10 -- up from the current $3 -- for each 90-day generic prescription filled by mail through Tricare, the military's health insurance program. Tricare's current $9 co-pay for a three-month supply of each brand-name drug would jump to $20.

The proposal would also impose charges for drugs the retirees now receive free at military hospitals and clinics. There would be a $10 fee for each generic prescription and a $20 charge for brand-name drugs dispensed at those facilities.

"You're tampering with a benefit that was earned by people putting their lives on the line," fumed James F. Lokovic, a retired Air Force chief master sergeant and deputy director of the Air Force Sergeants Association.

Lokovic's 136,000-member association has already sent Bush a letter warning of "significant backlash from millions of retired military voters" if the plan is included in the 2005 defense budget the administration will unveil in a few weeks.

The Texas Veterans Land Board says that 56,000 veterans live in El Paso, and that 18,000 of them are 65 or older.

An additional 441 veterans live in neighboring Hudspeth and Culberson counties. And many area veterans are not included in the count because they live in Juárez, say local veteran leaders.

A Pentagon spokesman declined Wednesday to comment on the drug plan, calling it "pre-decisional." But word of the proposal was being spread at the speed of light by veterans service organizations, who were e-mailing their thousands of members to solicit calls and letters of protest to the White House and members of Congress.

"It's something that we're going to look at very closely when we return," said Tom Gordy, chief of staff for Rep. Ed. Schrock, R-Va. The House is to reconvene on Jan. 20.

"Somebody just isn't paying attention," the Military Officers Association of America said in a "special alert" sent to its 390,000 members. "The war on terrorism is reminding the nation of servicemembers' sacrifices every night on the evening news ... and yet the administration seems to continue going out of its way to penalize the military community."

The Military Officers Association of America alert and an Internet site run by the Sergeants Association recall attempts by the administration to impose a $1,200 deductible for care provided to most military retirees at Veterans Affairs hospitals and the Pentagon's long-running opposition to bills providing for "concurrent receipt" of military pension and VA disability payments.

Bush and lawmakers agreed earlier this year on a concurrent receipt plan, a move widely seen as an attempt to shore up support for Republicans among military-minded voters. Military veterans and retirees are generally seen as providing Bush his 2000 margin of victory in several key states, including Florida.

The budget documents circulating Wednesday gave no hint of the current status of the plan or the thinking behind it. Military retirees -- those who served 20 years or more -- had no prescription drug coverage until April 2001.

But the documents indicate that the proposed charges would considerably ease the burden of prescription drug costs on the defense budget. The new co-pays would generate more than $728 million in 2005, the Pentagon estimated, and nearly $4.2 billion by the end of 2009.

The proposed fees also would bring the military's co-pays into line with those imposed by the VA, the documents assert.

But spokesmen for veterans groups noted that the VA fills prescriptions for service-related illnesses and injuries at no charge.

Its $7 co-pay applies only for medicines given to outpatients for ailments unrelated to their service. And even those prescriptions are provided free when the veteran receiving them has an annual income of less than $9,690 if single and $12,692 if married.

The El Paso Times contributed to this story.

By any chance... do you know who proposed these roll backs in Veteran benifits? My guess it was a proposal by a entrenched liberal who didn't agree with Anthony Principi's plan to extend these benifits to begin with.

Common sense tells me that after all what President Bush has done for our Troops and our Vetereans since he's been in office, this is just another attempt to cut into the support he has among our veterans and our troops.

These reporters have an agenda, and anyone who thinks they don't, I have a bridge to sell you.

My Sister-in-law, who lives with us, is a social worker at the VA Hospitol in Washington D.C. and she tells me that never before has the VA and the Military been paid this much attention, and she has worked there for almost 30 years