Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $20,403
25%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 25%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: obamaswars

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Taliban lead attacks on U.S. bases and government sites across Afghanistan

    04/16/2012 7:20:11 AM PDT · by Baynative · 36 replies
    McLatchy ^ | 4/16/12 | Jonathan S. Landay and Ali Safi
    Taliban-led insurgents opened a spring offensive Sunday with a wave of coordinated suicide missions, firing at embassies and government offices from seized buildings in Kabul and attacking U.S. bases and police stations in three eastern provinces. The strikes, which seemed to catch U.S.-led forces and Afghan authorities by surprise, sparked fierce firefights in Kabul and two other cities that underscored the insurgency's lethality as U.S. combat troops gird for the second phase of a withdrawal due to end in 2014.
  • Analysis: Obama's Afghanistan problem gets worse (Just like Iraq, Obama now losing Afghanistan)

    03/11/2012 5:34:53 PM PDT · by tobyhill · 37 replies
    google ^ | 3/11/2012 | ANNE FLAHERTY, Associated Press
    President Barack Obama has a PR problem when it comes to Afghanistan, to say the least. Once the must-fight war for America, the decade-long mission has spiraled into a series of U.S. missteps and violent outbreaks that have left few ardent political supporters. After NATO detained a U.S. soldier Sunday for allegedly killing sleeping Afghan villagers, Republicans and Democrats alike pointed to the stress on troops after years of fighting and reiterated calls to leave by the end of 2014 as promised, if not sooner. "It's just not a good situation," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "Our troops...
  • As Obama Cuts And Runs, Taliban Attacks Surge (Who Is Surprised)

    10/31/2011 6:01:23 PM PDT · by Kaslin · 11 replies
    IBD Editorial ^ | October 31, 2011 | Editor
    War On Terror: Have the president's swift military pullouts from Afghanistan and Iraq served U.S. interests? All we see is a "surge" on U.S. targets by our enemies, while our secretary of state pleads with them not to meddle. Pakistani-backed Taliban fighters on Saturday set off a 1,500-pound bomb on an armored vehicle full of American troops and allies, killing 18. It was their biggest armed attack on a U.S. target since they downed a helicopter carrying elite SEALs shortly after the unit took out Osama bin Laden. It was also the biggest attack ever against a U.S. target within...
  • Analysis: Will Obama's foreign policy success help?

    10/22/2011 10:24:40 AM PDT · by yoe · 33 replies · 1+ views
    Reuters ^ | October 21, 2011 | Steve Holland
    President Barack Obama delivered on another foreign policy promise on Friday with plans to pull the last U.S. troops from Iraq. But in a re-election campaign all about the weak U.S. economy, he may not get much credit. Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, radical Islamic cleric Anwar al-Awlaki and Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi -- these are all dead U.S. opponents that Democrat Obama can claim a measure of credit for getting. Now add to that Obama's announcement on Friday that the eight-year war in Iraq is ending, fulfilling a campaign goal he made in 2008 when he declared the...
  • Friday war document dump: Obama sends troops to Africa

    10/14/2011 2:41:18 PM PDT · by opentalk · 19 replies
    Michelle Malkin ^ | October 14, 2011 | Michelle Malkin
    All those Occupiers holding their “End the War!” signs better march on over to the White House. President Obama just announced he’s sending U.S. troops to central Africa to fight something called “the Lord’s Resistance Army.” The letter to House GOP Speaker John Boehner: TEXT OF A LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE October 14, 2011 Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:) For more than two decades, the Lord’s Resistance...On October 12, the initial team of U.S. military personnel with appropriate combat equipment deployed to Uganda....
  • Obama sending combat troops to central Africa to aid fight against rebels

    10/14/2011 11:09:02 AM PDT · by Berlin_Freeper · 270 replies · 1+ views
    CNN ^ | October 14th, 2011 | CNN
    President Obama has deployed combat troops to central Africa to aid in the fight against the Lord's Resistance Army. In a letter to Speaker of the House John Boehner, Obama says 12 troops with "appropriate combat equipment" were deployed on October 12 and approximately 100 in total will be deployed including a second combat team and headquarters, communications and logistics personnel. The forces will provide information and advise and assist "select partner nation forces," Obama explains. The troops will not fight except in self-defense. The full letter is after the jump.
  • Decreasing Iraq troops places American soldiers at risk

    09/15/2011 2:10:20 PM PDT · by conservativeforpalin · 6 replies
    The Washington Times ^ | September 15 | Henry D'Andrea
    President Obama's announcement that only 3,000 troops will be left in Iraq by the end of the year heralds a serious and dangerous downgrade from the current 45,000 troops, spelling disaster for our soldiers. According to a FOXNEWS report, President Obama’s military commanders are livid over this recent decision – a decision that Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta, allegedly gave signature to. President Obama may be trying to keep a 2008 campaign promise to remove our troops from Iraq however the problems is that regardless of what some misguided people may say, the war in Iraq is not over, there are...
  • The Overhyped Defense Cuts

    07/10/2011 8:35:33 AM PDT · by Kaslin · 38 replies
    Townhall.com ^ | July 10, 2011 | Steve Chapman
    Politicians often rail against government spending, except when it goes to the military. Conservatives believe there is no such thing as too much defense spending, and liberals don't argue, for fear of being labeled appeasers. So when there is talk of the two parties agreeing to cut the Pentagon budget, it sounds like a monumental change. But probably not. It's a good thing that defense, which accounts for roughly a fifth of all federal outlays, is no longer considered immune to the need for frugality. But both supporters and opponents have a stake in portraying any trims as far more...
  • Obama's Shocking Statement to Woodward About 'Losing' War

    09/29/2010 1:58:18 PM PDT · by RobinMasters · 16 replies
    The Fox Nation ^ | SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 | The Fox Nation
    BILL O'REILLY, FOX NEWS HOST: Who wouldn't want out of that mess? I mean we're spending billions of dollars over there and we're getting our people killed. Who wouldn't? But, here's the deal. Once you fight, you have to fight to win. You have to fight to win. And, a lot of Americans, including me, are not sure he has the heart for the fight. BOB WOODWARD: It's a fair question. When you look at the record here that's presented in this book, the "X" factor that never comes out, he never -- when I asked him, I said, "Well,...
  • Obama's new national security advisor called a 'disaster' by Gates

    10/10/2010 5:58:44 AM PDT · by bestintxas · 82 replies
    american thinker ^ | 10/9/10 | rick moran
    With the departure of General Jones from the White House, America is losing fine public servant and excellent military man. One of the few in Washington who eschewed the limelight, Jones did his job fairly competently and with a minimum of self promotion. Will we get that lucky with his replacement? The man picked to be President Obama's next national security advisor was sharply criticized by top officials in the administration, with the Secretary of Defense saying he would be a "disaster" in the job. According to the new book about the Obama administration's handling of Iraq and Afghanistan by...
  • What happened to the Barack Obama dream?

    09/25/2010 8:19:00 PM PDT · by Schnucki · 59 replies
    London Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | September 23, 2010 | Alex Spillius
    Bob Woodward's searing critique of the Democrats' war strategy comes as key advisers are leaving and voters lose patience with Barack Obama's promise to deliver 'hope and change'. Alex Spillius reports on an increasingly isolated President. When Barack Obama took office 20 months ago – and what a long 20 months it seems – there was a lot of talk about the great "Team of Rivals" he was appointing around him. Parallels were drawn with the cabinet of substantial talents and big personalities assembled by Abraham Lincoln to rebuild the nation after the civil war. Now, in a new book,...
  • CSPAN Caller Asks Bob Woodward if He's Republican or Democrat (Video)

    10/08/2010 10:56:17 AM PDT · by Talkradio03 · 13 replies
    HAP ^ | 10/8/10 | hap
    Caller wants to know if he's Democrat or Republican and who he voted for in '68 and '72 (Video)
  • Bob Woodward: An Obama/Clinton ticket in 2012 is “on the table”

    10/05/2010 5:08:53 PM PDT · by RobinMasters · 54 replies
    Hot Air ^ | October 04, 2010 | ALLAHPUNDIT
    If the economy’s as flat next winter as it is now, isn’t it a damn near certainty? Obama’s approval rating will be deep in the toilet and Republican candidates will be energized to take on a weak incumbent. His only option will be to jolt the electorate and convince them that term two would be different from term one by welcoming the Clintons aboard. Electing the first woman VP — and anointing her as the likely nominee in 2016 — would help bring home women voters who’d grown tired of Hopenchange and would give Hillary Democrats a reason to turn...
  • US ready to bomb 150 Pakistani terror camps?

    09/28/2010 8:11:06 AM PDT · by James C. Bennett · 31 replies
    The Times of India ^ | 28 September, 2010 | The Times of India
    WASHINGTON: The United States has a secret "retribution" plan to bomb more than 150 terror camps in Pakistan in the event of another major terrorist attack originating from that country. This startling disclosure about Washington's "all bets off" policy towards an ostensibly dubious ally in the war on terror is contained in Bob Woodward's opus " Obama's War," which details an evolving US approach in the region. The plan pre-dates the Obama presidency, going back to the Bush White House, but elements of policy, aimed at wiping out terrorist sanctuaries in Pakistan, is evident in the current administration's ruthless bombing...
  • Obama: 'We need to make clear to people that the cancer is in Pakistan' (Woodward Excerpt)

    09/29/2010 12:10:57 PM PDT · by mojito · 19 replies · 1+ views
    WaPo ^ | 9/29/2010 | Bob Woodward
    President Obama dispatched his national security adviser, retired Marine Gen. James L. Jones, and CIA Director Leon Panetta to Pakistan for a series of urgent, secret meetings on May 19, 2010. Less than three weeks earlier, a 30-year-old U.S. citizen born in Pakistan had tried to blow up an SUV in New York City's Times Square. The crude bomb - which a Pakistan-based terrorist group had taught him to make - smoked but did not explode. Only luck had prevented a catastrophe. "We're living on borrowed time," Jones told Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari at their meeting in Islamabad. "We...
  • US has 3000-strong crack squad in Afghanistan to wage its secret war in Pakistan

    09/23/2010 9:37:34 AM PDT · by LibWhacker · 18 replies
    Sindh Today | ANI ^ | 9/22/10 | Julius Cavendish
    Washington, Sept 23 (ANI): An Afghan paramilitary force with a strength of 3000 well-armed troops, collectively known as Counterterrorism Pursuit Teams, has been trained and deployed in Afghanistan not only for surveillance, raids and combat operations in Afghanistan, but also for the United States’ secret war in Pakistan against the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, according to current and former US officials. While the existence of these teams is disclosed in ‘Obama’s Wars,’ a forthcoming book by famed journalist Bob Woodward, interviews with sources familiar with the CIA’s operations, as well as a review of the database of 76,000 classified U.S. military...
  • In “Obama’s Wars” “Victory” is Not an Option

    09/25/2010 8:39:16 AM PDT · by jmaroneps37 · 5 replies
    coachisright.com ^ | SEPTEMBER 25TH, 2010 | Jim Emerson, staff writer
    Obama has little faith in the U.S. military fighting the war in Afghanistan. A careful review of reports of Bob Woodward’s new book “Obama’s Wars” tells us the president avoided any mention of victory as he outlined his war objectives. Since the day he took office President Obama desperately looked for a quick exit from Afghanistan. He pressured his military advisors for an exit plan to cut and run leaving the Afghanis to the mercies of the Taliban who will certainly start seeking revenge for their humiliation the day we leave. Obama has been quoted by his staff saying, “This...
  • Bob Woodward book details Obama battles with advisers over exit plan for Afghan war

    09/22/2010 6:03:14 AM PDT · by SonOfDarkSkies · 32 replies
    WaPo ^ | 9/22/2010 | Steve Luxenberg
    President Obama urgently looked for a way out of the war in Afghanistan last year, repeatedly pressing his top military advisers for an exit plan that they never gave him, according to secret meeting notes and documents cited in a new book by journalist Bob Woodward. ... According to Woodward's meeting-by-meeting, memo-by-memo account of the 2009 Afghan strategy review, the president avoided talk of victory as he described his objectives. "This needs to be a plan about how we're going to hand it off and get out of Afghanistan," Obama is quoted as telling White House aides as he laid...
  • Obama: "We can absorb a terrorist attack" (Woodward book)

    09/22/2010 10:09:19 AM PDT · by quesney · 168 replies
    Woodward's book portrays Obama and the White House as barraged by warnings about the threat of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil and confronted with the difficulty in preventing them. During an interview with Woodward in July, the president said, "We can absorb a terrorist attack. We'll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever . . . we absorbed it and we are stronger."
  • White House: New Woodward book shows 'decisive' president

    09/22/2010 8:05:15 AM PDT · by Sub-Driver · 38 replies
    White House: New Woodward book shows 'decisive' president


 By Sam Youngman - 09/22/10 10:23 AM ET The White House says the new book by famed Washington journalist Bob Woodward, "Obama's Wars," paints a picture of an "analytical, strategic and decisive" wartime president and "does not reveal anything new" about the administration's war strategy. After excerpts of Woodward's book containing explosive revelations appeared in The New York Times and The Washington Post late Tuesday night, a senior administration official responded that the full picture is one of a president asking hard questions to make difficult decisions about Afghanistan — not simply...