Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $33,557
41%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 41%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: obamacaretax

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • SCOTUS Ruling Means Bigger, More Intrusive IRS [ IRS now can look at your kids income too ]

    07/03/2012 11:57:19 AM PDT · by NoLibZone · 14 replies
    foxbusiness.com ^ | July 3 2012 | Fox News
    IRS officials on background tell FOX Business the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on health reform gives the IRS even more powers than previously understood. The IRS now gets to know about a small business's entire payroll, the level of their insurance coverage -- and it gets to know the income of not just the primary breadwinner in your house, but your entire family’s income, in order to assess/collect the mandated tax.Read more: http://www.foxbusiness.com/government/2012/06/29/scotus-ruling-means-bigger-more-intrusive-irs/#ixzz1zaTFEJT5
  • FLASHBACK: Romney Acknowledged His Massachusetts Healthcare Plan Imposed A Tax [ MSM falters]

    07/02/2012 1:44:08 PM PDT · by NoLibZone · 13 replies
    ABC news ^ | June 29 2012 | ABC news
    ABC News’ Michael Falcone reports: In what is now a well-known exchange from ABC News’ January 2008 Republican presidential debate at St. Anselm College in New Hampshire, Mitt Romney declared “I like mandates” when asked by moderator Charlie Gibson about his approach to health care reform in Massachusetts. But there’s another moment from the debate that’s getting more traction after yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling — on in which Romney says “yes,” when asked is the health reform law he ushered in as governor constituted a tax. GIBSON: ”Governor … you imposed tax penalties in Massachusetts?” ROMNEY: ”Yes, we said, look,...
  • Pelosi: ObamaCare a Penalty That Comes Under Tax Code

    07/01/2012 5:15:25 PM PDT · by Kaslin · 26 replies
    Townhall.com ^ | July 1, 2012 | Katie Pavlich
    What? The former Speaker is saying ObamaCare is a penalty, not a tax, that is enforced by the tax code...or something. Gregory: Is it a tax? Pelosi: No no, no no. Pelosi: Right, ObamaCare Is Constitutional Under Taxing PowerIs this what Pelosi meant by "passing the bill to see what's in it?" The Supreme Court saw what was in ObamaCare, ruled it a tax, and she, along with top White House officials, are saying it's a tax. It is very clear the Democrats have their talking points together. And yet, DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz is accusing Republicans of being...
  • “America Has Without a Doubt Become More European”

    07/01/2012 9:36:56 PM PDT · by Olog-hai · 31 replies
    Der Spiegel ^ | 06/29/2012 | Miriam Widman
    In a 5 to 4 vote, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the controversial provision requiring Americans to purchase health insurance was not unconstitutional, as its opponents had hoped, but amounted to a levy which Congress can issue based on its constitutional right to collect taxes. In a surprise move, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, long seen as a staunch conservative, backed the ruling and delivered the verdict. German healthcare experts have long had difficulty understanding the debate in the United States because mandatory healthcare insurance has been required for decades in Germany, just as it is in many...
  • 'We Will Take it Anyway We Can Get it' - Valerie Jarrett Admits ObamaCare Is A Tax

    07/01/2012 6:10:19 PM PDT · by NoLibZone · 21 replies
    http://www.breitbart.com ^ | July 1 2012 | breitbart
    Video at link Friday in a Roland Martin interview Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett on Obama Care tax 'We will take it anyway we can get it.'
  • No Bounce: Poll Shows Obamacare Ruling Did Not Help Obama

    07/01/2012 6:07:01 PM PDT · by NoLibZone · 32 replies
    breitbart.com ^ | July 1 2012 | breitbart.com
    A Rasmussen daily tracking poll showed President Barack Obama did not receive a bounce from the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding Obamacare.
  • Schumer: Roberts Broke His Promise On Commerce Clause

    07/01/2012 4:38:05 PM PDT · by NoLibZone · 69 replies
    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo ^ | July 1 2012 | Kapur
    U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts’ swing vote to uphold ‘Obamacare’ under Congress’s taxing powers has drawn praise from his usual critics. One top Democratic senator lauded Roberts’ “judicial independence” in saving President Obama’s signature law, but also argued that the Bush-appointed jurist broke his promise by narrowing the scope of the Commerce Clause. In his opinion, Roberts explained in detail why he believes his view is not inconsistent with precedent, siding with conservative architects of the legal challenge in the argument that Congress may not regulate inaction. “In my view it certainly merited upholding under the Commerce Clause,” said Sen....
  • WSJ Chief Economist: 75% of Obamacare Costs Will Fall on Backs of Those Making Less Than $120K

    07/01/2012 2:01:50 PM PDT · by NoLibZone · 37 replies
    humanevents.com ^ | July 1 2012 | By: Jim Hoft
    Take Your Medicine, America… Stephen Moore, Senior Economics Writer with the Wall Street Journal, told FOX and Friends this morning that nearly 75% of Obamacare costs will fall on the backs of those Americans making less than $120,000 a year.
  • Why John Roberts is Mitt Romney's Secret Weapon

    07/01/2012 7:29:54 AM PDT · by Kaslin · 90 replies
    Townhall.com ^ | July 1, 2012 | Kevin McCullough
    I would caution my fellow conservatives on the frustration they may be enticed to express at Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts. It is unwarranted, and it is unwise. The reason I state such is that it is my firm belief that the Roberts' decision on the Obamacare mandate will without question bring about ultimate doom to the government control of healthcare, and through the best means possible--not judicial activism--but through the democratic process. In boxing terminology no one has pulled a "rope-a-dope" this effective since Muhammad Ali himself. In doing so, it is clear that John Roberts duped the...
  • ShowPrep Vanity- What do we call it? ObamaTax, or ObamaCare Tax?

    07/01/2012 1:15:57 PM PDT · by NoLibZone · 66 replies
    Vanity | July 1 2012 | NLZ
    Whats shall we lable the new mandate? ObamaTax? ObamaCare Tax?
  • What type of tax is it?

    07/01/2012 8:44:32 AM PDT · by Sodbuster · 60 replies
    7/1/12 | Sodbuster
    The Obamacare penalty was ruled a tax by Robers. I am trying to identify what type of tax it is. Is it an income tax? No. Is it a property tax? No. I wouldn't be taxed on property that I own. I would be taxed on services that I didn't buy. Is it a sales tax? No. I wouldn't be paying a percentage sales tax on soemthing that I bought, I would be paying a tax on something that I didn't buy. Is there anything like this 'tax' in existence today? I truly need to know. How can a person...
  • Why the Individual Mandate is still constitutional

    06/30/2012 7:57:31 AM PDT · by madprof98 · 20 replies
    Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | June 29, 2012 | Jamie Dupree
    Since the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Obama health law on Thursday, I have received a number of messages from listeners and readers arguing that because the Justices found the individual mandate was a tax, it was unconstitutional, as that plan didn't start in the House. "Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution states that 'All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House,'" is what the Constitution says, these readers argue. They go on to say that since the mandate was added in the Senate, and not in the House, the entire plan should have been found unconstitutional....
  • TRANSCRIPT & AUDIO: Supreme Court: The Health Care Law And The Individual Mandate Day 2

    06/29/2012 9:09:23 AM PDT · by Til I am the last man standing · 3 replies
    NPR ^ | 3/27/12 | SCOTUS
    CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Why didn't Congress call it a tax, then? SG VERRILLI: Well - CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: You're telling me they thought of it as a tax, they defended it on the tax power. Why didn't they say it was a tax? SG VERRILLI: They might have thought, Your Honor, that calling it a penalty as they did would make it more effective in accomplishing its objective. But it is — in the Internal Revenue Code it is collected by the IRS on April 15th. I don't think this is a situation in which you can say - CHIEF...
  • Axelrod Won’t Say Mandate Is A Tax

    06/29/2012 8:08:08 AM PDT · by Nachum · 48 replies
    Free Beacon ^ | 6/29/12 | staff
    Axelrod spinning
  • Obamacare's Hidden Taxes

    06/28/2012 5:08:02 PM PDT · by Kaslin · 18 replies
    IBD Editorials ^ | June 28, 2012 | Editor
    Taxation: The high bench has confirmed that ObamaCare's individual mandate is a massive tax on the American middle class. But let's not forget the 20 other new taxes that are embedded in the law. Though President Obama never sold it as a tax hike, the Supreme Court ruled the mandate is exactly that. Unfortunately, the majority argued it's legal under Congress' taxing authority. Forcing citizens to buy health insurance "is absolutely not a tax increase," Obama insisted in 2009. Earlier, he assured the public that raising taxes on the middle class to support his health care plan was "the last...
  • Supreme Court Rewrites ObamaCare; Rules Individual Mandate Is Permissible Tax

    06/28/2012 5:34:54 PM PDT · by ScottfromNJ · 71 replies
    The New American ^ | June 28 2012 | Joe Wolverton, II
    “Simply put, Congress may tax and spend.” With those historic words, the Supreme Court forced upon the United States a bleak dawn of a brave new world in which the federal government cannot be checked in its march toward totalitarianism. In a 5-4 decision the Supreme Court upheld the joint venture of the President and Congress to force every American, regardless of ability or desire, to purchase a qualifying health care insurance plan by 2014 or face a tax penalty for failure to comply. Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the Court, held while the “individual mandate is not a valid...
  • Health-Reform is Constitutional: Here are the Tax Implications (Taxes and more taxes)

    06/28/2012 5:49:22 PM PDT · by tobyhill · 23 replies
    Fox News ^ | 6/28/2012 | by Bonnie Lee
    In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld the president’s signature health-care reform in a 5-4 decision. The court ruled the most controversial aspect of the law, the individual mandate, as constitutional, labeling it a tax and within lawmakers’ power. So now that the legal uncertainty surrounding the Affordable Care Act has been eliminated, it’s time to delve into the tax implications and when they go into effect. ,,,, Excise tax: This 2.3% tax on manufacturers, producers or importers on the sold price of a medical device is intended to help cover the cost of the sweeping legislation, but some...
  • Why Roberts Did It

    06/28/2012 1:47:53 PM PDT · by Meet the New Boss · 104 replies
    National Review Online ^ | 28 June 2012 | Charles Krauthammer
    It’s the judiciary’s Nixon-to-China: Chief Justice John Roberts joins the liberal wing of the Supreme Court and upholds the constitutionality of Obamacare. How? By pulling off one of the great constitutional finesses of all time. He managed to uphold the central conservative argument against Obamacare, while at the same time finding a narrow definitional dodge to uphold the law — and thus prevented the Court from being seen as having overturned, presumably on political grounds, the signature legislation of this administration. snip Whatever one thinks of the substance of Bush v. Gore, it did affect the reputation of the Court....
  • Conservatives’ consolation prize [George Will on 0bamacare decision]

    06/28/2012 1:48:52 PM PDT · by Hunton Peck · 49 replies
    The Washington Post ^ | Thursday, June 28, 2012, 1:56 PM | George F. Will
    Conservatives won a substantial victory Thursday. The physics of American politics — actions provoking reactions — continues to move the crucial debate, about the nature of the American regime, toward conservatism. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. has served this cause. The health-care legislation’s expansion of the federal government’s purview has improved our civic health by rekindling interest in what this expansion threatens — the Framers’ design for limited government. Conservatives distraught about the survival of the individual mandate are missing the considerable consolation prize they won when the Supreme Court rejected a constitutional rationale for the mandate — Congress’s...
  • Obama’s Pyrrhic Victory

    06/28/2012 2:16:48 PM PDT · by Hojczyk · 50 replies
    Dick Morris.Com ^ | June 27,2012 | Dick Morris
    Today, Barack Obama won the battle but will lose the war. The Supreme Court decision makes Obamacare the central issue in the 2012 election, just like it was in the 2010 election. And we know how that turned out. The Court has sustained the individual mandate. That imposes on us a mandate: To defeat Obama and take the Senate. Now that is the only way we can kill this horrible law. Public opinion has rejected this law for two years now by about the same margin: 40% support; 55% oppose. While the Court decision may give the law a short...