Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $66,435
82%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 82%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: impeachment

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Republicans dismiss impeachment, say it would ‘martyr’ Obama

    11/30/2014 8:23:23 PM PST · by PROCON · 122 replies
    washingtontimes ^ | Nov. 30, 2014 | S.A. Miller
    Unsuccessful attempt could undermine GOP efforts to reverse amnesty orderCapitol Hill Republicans have furiously denounced President Obama’s executive action on immigration as illegal, unconstitutional and an abuse of the power of his office — but they get skittish when the talk turns to impeachment. Even Rep. Steve King, one of the most fiery opponents of the president’s “executive amnesty” for illegal immigrants, backed away from his previous calls for impeachment.“I don’t want to do the ‘I’ word. Nobody wants to throw the nation into that kind of turmoil,” the Iowa Republican told CNN immediately following Mr. Obama’s executive action.
  • STEYN: OBAMA INCENTIVIZES THE LAWLESS AND PENALIZES THE LAWFUL

    11/30/2014 10:03:59 AM PST · by Beave Meister · 9 replies
    Breitbart ^ | 11/29/2014 | Jeff Poor
    In filling in for Rush Limbaugh on his Friday show, conservative commentator Mark Steyn scoffed at the notion Republicans would handle impeachment well enough to even attempt. The author of “The Undocumented Mark Steyn” responded a caller’s question about impeachment and acknowledge that Obama penalizes the lawful, while incentivizing the lawless, but was skeptical congressional Republicans would do anything about it. As it pertained to impeachment, he pointed to the impeachment proceedings against former President Bill Clinton in the 1990s and explained that based upon the Republican Senate leadership’s handling of impeachment at the time, there is no reason to...
  • If Not Now, When?

    11/28/2014 3:03:54 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 26 replies
    Conservatives are not split as to whether or not Obama and his ministers have committed high crimes. We are split over what to do about it. There is no question Obama has gathered arbitrary powers within the executive branch to make, ignore, modify congressional statutes at his whim. His administrative agencies, a shadow army of lawgivers whose identities (sans Gruber) are kept quiet and out of public view, issue dozens of unconstitutional and imperial diktats every year. OTOH, what is certain is that impeachment of American presidents is unfortunately an historic rarity. Taken all together, impeachment is largely viewed as...
  • Peter H. Schuck: Yes, Congress can impeach Obama

    11/27/2014 6:26:20 PM PST · by 2ndDivisionVet · 40 replies
    The Dallas Morning News ^ | November 24, 2014 | Peter H. Schuck
    Now that President Barack Obama has granted legal relief to as many as 5 million unauthorized immigrants, Republicans are thrashing about for an effective response. Only a few hard-liners are talking about impeachment now, but more could join them out of frustration with their other options. Many people in both parties have tried to quell such talk by saying the president is within his powers to issue the order. The problem is the pro-impeachment Republicans are right: There is a plausible case for taking that step. By constitutional design, impeachment for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors” is...
  • Will Obama be impeached now that Republicans control both houses of Congress?

    11/26/2014 12:42:17 PM PST · by Jim Robinson · 105 replies
    Renew America ^ | Updated November 20, 2014 | By Stephen Stone, RenewAmerica President
    Shortly after communist-mentored Barack Obama was elected to the White House in 2008, I asked a brother at a family gathering, "Who's going to be president of the United States in 20 years?" Without hesitating, he said, "Barack Obama." More informed than most people I'd asked, he instantly got the drift of my question. As I was thinking through the implications of the de facto communist coup that precipitated the question, however, I was struck with a realization that gave me some degree of hope in the face of our nation's heightened peril. Although no major communist strongman in the...
  • Congratulations Obama, Holder and assorted race pimps

    11/25/2014 1:34:07 AM PST · by Jim Robinson · 44 replies
    You egged them on and you got your riots. Ferguson is burning. And for what purpose?
  • Remove the Tyrant. Reverse the Tyranny.

    11/24/2014 11:20:37 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 24 replies
    Vanity
    Elections no longer serve their intended purpose, to temporarily empower others to make law on our behalf, subject to constitutional limitations. Obama plainly said last week that the outcome of the midterms meant the exact opposite of its results. He will issue diktats on behalf of those who didn’t vote! His first act was to lead a barbarian invasion across our southern border. A last ditch defense of our republic demands two actions. First, the virus that afflicts our governing body, Barack Obama, must be excised. If not, he will continue his scorched earth demonic march through our God given...
  • THE CATALYST TO CATASTROPHE (Way Beyond Bizarre)

    11/22/2014 2:52:57 PM PST · by 2ndDivisionVet · 6 replies
    <p>Who deliberately violated his solemn oath to uphold the Constitution in his insatiable quest to gain political power? Who currently not only advocates voter suppression but engineers it all across the land? Who works hand-in-glove with the Koch brothers to destroy democracy, remaking America into a Third World oligarchy? Who served as the political guru commissioned to deceive the American people into war, engineered stolen national elections, personally selected federal judges who pledged to serve foremost as political hacks, outed a CIA agent whose husband exposed treason committed by the President and his Vice, initiated whispering campaigns based on falsehoods about opponents, and sat in the White House as Chief Political Counsel to George W. Bush?</p>
  • OBAMA CALLS LINDSEY GRAHAM'S 'IMPEACHMENT' BLUFF ON GITMO

    11/21/2014 10:08:52 PM PST · by Jim Robinson · 40 replies
    Breitbart ^ | November 21, 2014 | by JOEL B. POLLAK
    On June 4, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) warned that President Barack Obama could face "impeachment" if he continued to release terror detainees from the military prison facility at Guantánamo Bay without Congress's explicit approval. On Thursday, however--the same day that the president announced his unilateral executive amnesty--Obama released five more terror detainees from Guantánamo, including four Al Qaeda fighters. At the time, Graham told The Hill: “It’s going to be impossible for them to flow prisoners out of Gitmo now without a huge backlash....There will be people on our side calling for his impeachment if he did that.” The context...
  • Judge Napolitano: Impeachment Is The Only “Legal Remedy” To President Obama’s Executive Amnesty

    11/21/2014 4:28:57 PM PST · by Brown Deer · 75 replies
    Fox News Radio ^ | 11/21/2014 | Tom Sullivan
    If President Obama grants executive amnesty to an unknown millions of Americans, there’s only one way Republicans can stop him — impeachment. On Thursday’s show, the Judge told FOX News Radio’s Tom Sullivan why the President may have to resort to such extreme measures. He says, while Presidents do have right to practice prosecutorial discretion when it comes to immigration, Obama’s proposed actions risk nullifying the law altogether. And that’s going too far.
  • Sen. Coburn Fears 'Anarchy' & 'Violence' After Obama Exec Amnesty

    11/20/2014 1:49:36 PM PST · by Tailgunner Joe · 29 replies
    breitbart.com ^ | November 20, 2014 | Tony Lee
    Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) is concerned that President Barack Obama's forthcoming executive amnesty may lead to anarchy and violence. "The country's going to go nuts, because they're going to see it as a move outside the authority of the president, and it's going to be a very serious situation," Coburn told USA Today on Wednesday. "You're going to see — hopefully not — but you could see instances of anarchy. ... You could see violence." Coburn added that Obama, who will make a Thursday evening announcement on his executive amnesty, will be acting like "an autocratic leader that's going to...
  • Sarah Palin on Exec Amnesty: Obama Giving Americans 'Middle Finger,' Endangering Nation

    11/20/2014 8:44:22 PM PST · by PROCON · 32 replies
    breitbart ^ | Nov. 20, 2014 | Tony Lee
    On Thursday, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin blasted President Barack Obama for endangering the country and screwing American workers--U.S.-born and legal immigrants--of all backgrounds with his executive amnesty for illegal immigrants. In a video released on her Sarah Palin Channel before Obama's White House executive amnesty address, Palin, who called for Obama to be impeached on behalf of American workers for his lawlessness on illegal immigration, said Obama is "betraying our trust" by going "against the wishes of the American people" with with his executive amnesty. "In 2012, voters reelected President Barack Obama but they did not make him king,"...
  • U.S. Rep. Mo Brooks blasts Obama's immigration plan, describes him as 'petulant child'

    11/20/2014 7:57:47 PM PST · by Tailgunner Joe · 13 replies
    al.com ^ | November 20, 2014 | Paul Gattis
    HUNTSVILLE, Alabama - The far-reaching scope of President Obama's immigration plan unveiled Thursday night exceeded the expectations of U.S. Rep. Mo Brooks, who described the president as acting like a "petulant child." "I expected the president to consider each of the individual parts of what he proposed tonight but even I was surprised at how far the president went with everything - including the kitchen sink - in order to appease the open borders wing of the Democratic Party," said Brooks, R-Huntsville. "It's astonishing." In an interview with AL.com following the speech, Brooks said Obama's plan is "declaring open borders"...
  • (Vanity) The Congress shall have power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

    11/20/2014 2:56:49 PM PST · by RC one · 11 replies
    vanity | vanity
    Article 1, section 8, clause 4: The Congress shall have power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization The authority to control immigration and naturalization does not rest with the President. This is his most flagrant violation of the US constitution yet and is clear grounds for impeachment. There is no other recourse for this kind of lawlessness.
  • Obama's Amnesty Lawlessness Demands Accountability

    11/20/2014 1:43:29 PM PST · by jazusamo · 28 replies
    Creators Syndicate ^ | November 21, 2014 | David Limbaugh
    Time and time again, President Obama demonstrates his contempt for the Constitution and for the American people, whose integrity and will must be subordinated to his personal prerogative and hijacked sovereignty. Obama has admitted on several occasions that he had no authority to act unilaterally, via executive order, to grant amnesty to millions of immigrants who came here illegally, so his doing so is, in his own opinion, flagrantly illegal. Daily he proves to us that his words mean nothing. They are utilitarian tools to serve his political purposes. When traveling the country to rally support for the DREAM Act,...
  • National Day of Reckoning! [Impeach Obama]

    11/20/2014 11:53:25 AM PST · by Jim Robinson · 223 replies
    November 20, 2014 | Jim Robinson
    Received a message this morning requesting a repeat of the National Day of Protest against amnesty that was held a couple of months ago. I'm all for it, but think this time it should be entitled, "National Day of Reckoning!" and should be repeated weekly for the duration. FR was instrumental in leading the fight for impeachment against the criminal Clinton. Well, Clintoon was a piker compared to our new tyrant. As much as the Republicans fear impeaching our first black president, I'm afraid it must be done. The Constitution demands it!! We cannot cower in fear as our wannabe...
  • OBAMA IMPEACHMENT FEAR: NATIONWIDE ‘FERGUSON’?

    11/19/2014 2:04:08 PM PST · by Jim Robinson · 137 replies
    BarbWire ^ | November 19, 2014 | By Gina Miller
    Powerlessly watching our nation fall in not-so-slow motion is a nightmare from which we cannot wake up. It’s clear to all but the most obtuse and deceived among us that the United States of America has been taken over by Marxist enemies within. We have a completely lawless president, a man who speaks only lies, who has shown himself to be an anti-American subversive, hell-bent on the destruction of our Constitution and representative Republic. Using extra-constitutional schemes, blatant fraud and federal bureaucratic dictates, he is destroying our economy, our energy sector, our healthcare system, our borders, our military and our...
  • Catching Obama if we can

    11/19/2014 9:09:51 AM PST · by Sean_Anthony · 6 replies
    Canada Free Press ^ | 11/19/14 | Judi McLeod
    It’s six years on, and America is still under the control of a poseur who picked his name out of thin air Even though it’s the most infamous name of our time, Barack Obama is just a name that some one with a different name simply one day picked out of the thin air. Nothing legal—including impeachment—can be conducted on a fraud president hiding behind a purely made up name. If you can get away with picking a name for yourself out of thin air, you can afford to be ‘in yer face’ about it, and even tag it with...
  • We are probably getting to the point where Biden is preferable to Obama...

    11/17/2014 11:19:05 AM PST · by The Looking Spoon · 36 replies
    CRASHR ^ | 11-17-14 | The Looking Spoon
    Republican bulldog Rep. Trey Gowdy put the kibosh on the idea of impeaching President Obama during a nationally television Fox News interview, telling his broadcast audience that booting the commander-in-chief from his office would open the doors to something even worse —the ascension of Vice President Joseph R. Biden. The Biden-is-insurance joke has been around since 2008, and people saw it as less of a joke back then than they do now, I think. It really does seem like the only way Obama could become more unhinged is if Democrats still controlled both houses of Congress.I'm not sure if...
  • Anti-Impeachment Insurance

    11/16/2014 11:17:00 AM PST · by Sean_Anthony · 14 replies
    Joe Biden If the question is asked, “What is the number one reason that any first time presidential candidate really has for selecting a running mate?” a common answer is, “Someone who could step in as president should the need arise.” Although that should be a primary consideration, it is rarely if ever the case no matter which political party one is talking about. In almost all cases an individual is selected as a running mate for one reason and one reason only and that is to help get the ticket elected. It is very simple, if the ticket fails...