Free Republic 3rd Quarter Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $78,466
89%  
Woo hoo!! And now over 89%!! Less than $9.6k to go!! Let's git 'er done!! Thank you all very much!!

Posts by WilliamofCarmichael

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Birth Rights: CITIZENSHIP AND THE CONSTITUTION

    09/04/2015 10:50:34 AM PDT · 2 of 4
    WilliamofCarmichael to WilliamofCarmichael
    I used as source for the three cases:

    INS v. Rios-Pineda (1985)

    Plyler v. Doe (1982)

    United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898)

    I believe it is true that there has never been before the Supreme Court the issue of citizenship specific to children born here of ILLEGAL aliens, or of mothers legally here but with the intention of returning to their home country with their "American citizen" babies. I include currently in the status of overstaying visas as ILLEGAL aliens.

    United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) was about an adult male born here. The alien parents resided here legally. INS v. Rios-Pineda (deported ILLEGAL alien parents of children born here) contained the remark or observation that children born here are "within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States;" it was in dictum I believe . . . but used by some to be a holding and though birthright citizenship had, at most, incidental bearing on the case nevertheless the remark is assumed to be a Court ruling. Apparently. Plyler v. Doe (1982) was simply about all children no matter what are entitled to a public education. But there was that famous Footnote 10.

    Why was an incidental remark or observation with a narrower meaning in United States v. Wong Kim Ark labeled in dictum (See below United States v. Wong Kim Ark "'subject to its jurisdiction' was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States.") and the aforementioned incidental remark with the broad meaning considered, a holding? Why didn't the broad meaning also evoke Chief Justice Marshall to explain:

    "It is a maxim not to be disregarded that general expressions in every opinion are to be taken in connection with the case in which those expressions are used. If they go beyond the case, they may be respected, but ought not to control the judgment in a subsequent suit when the very point is presented for decision. The reason of this maxim is obvious. The question actually before the court is investigated with care, and considered in its full extent. Other principles which may serve to illustrate it are considered in their relation to the case decided, but their possible bearing on all other cases is seldom completely investigated."

    United States v. Wong Kim Ark text made the point over and over that any child born in the Country is a matter of common law location, location, location and therefore "is as much a citizen as the natural-born child of a citizen;" jus solis

    But

    United States v. Wong Kim Ark text recognized that there can be exceptions. It excepted children of foreign sovereigns or their ministers, "or of enemies within and during a hostile occupation of part of our territory." It even included two other exceptions: born on foreign public ships and "children of members of the Indian tribes owing direct allegiance to their several tribes."

    United States v. Wong Kim Ark text noted that "issue born abroad . . . of American citizens . . . should inherit, to some extent at least, the rights of their parents;" jus sanguinis an exception to common law? BTW United States v. Wong Kim Ark included this "depending on birth within the realm [common law], [was] originally founded on feudal considerations"; like compliant servile obedient subjects (Democratic votes) and cheap labor? The two Parties needed votes and cheap labor in the 19th Century.

    Two other cases are Plyler v. Doe; and INS v. Rios-Pineda.

    In INS v. Rios-Pineda seemed like every time the ILLEGAL alien mother's child born here was mentioned there was included a remark that the child "is a citizen of the United States." Did that remark have a bearing on the case? I do not think so I believe the couple lost the case.

    Plyler v. Doe contains the Footnote: with the observation that "no plausible distinction with respect to Fourteenth Amendment 'jurisdiction' can be drawn between resident aliens whose entry into the United States was lawful, and resident aliens whose entry was unlawful."

    [Begin Plyler v. Doe quotes]

    Syllabus

    Held:

    • A Texas statute
      • which withholds from local school districts any state funds for the education of children who were not "legally admitted" into the United States, and
      • which authorizes local school districts to deny enrollment to such children,
    • violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
    . . .
    • In appellants' view,
    • persons who have entered the United States illegally
    • are not "within the jurisdiction" of a State
      • even if they are present within a State's boundaries and
      • subject to its laws.
    • Neither our cases nor
    • the logic of the Fourteenth Amendment support that constricting construction of
    • the phrase "within its jurisdiction." [Footnote 10]

    . . .

    [Footnote 10] Although we have not previously focused on the intended meaning of this phrase, we have had occasion to examine the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment, which provides that "[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States. . . ." (Emphasis added.) Justice Gray, writing for the Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649 (1898), detailed at some length the history of the Citizenship Clause, and the predominantly geographic sense in which the term "jurisdiction" was used. He further noted that it was "impossible to construe the words 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof,' in the opening sentence [of the Fourteenth Amendment], as less comprehensive than the words 'within its jurisdiction,' in the concluding sentence of the same section; or to hold that persons 'within the jurisdiction' of one of the States of the Union are not 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Id. at 169 U. S. 687.

    Justice Gray concluded that "[e]very citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States." Id. at 169 U. S. 693.

    As one early commentator noted, given the historical emphasis on geographic territoriality, bounded only, if at all, by principles of sovereignty and allegiance, no plausible distinction with respect to Fourteenth Amendment "jurisdiction" can be drawn between resident aliens whose entry into the United States was lawful, and resident aliens whose entry was unlawful. See C. Bouve, Exclusion and Expulsion of Aliens in the United States 425-427 (1912).

    [end Footnote 10 quotes. Return to Plyler v. Doe top]

    . . . .

    [Begin United States v. Wong Kim Ark quotes]

    . . .

    In a very recent case, the Supreme Court of New Jersey held that

    • a person born in this country of Scotch parents
      • who were domiciled but had not been naturalized here
      was "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, and
      was "not subject to any foreign power" within the meaning of the Civil Rights Act of 1866;
    • and, in an opinion delivered by Justice Van Syckel with the concurrence of Chief Justice Beasley, said:
    • "The object of the Fourteenth Amendment,
      • as is well known,
      was to confer upon the colored race the right of citizenship.
    • It
      • , however,
      gave to the colored people no right superior to that granted to the white race.
    • The ancestors of all the colored people then in the United States were of foreign birth, and
      could not have been naturalized or in any way have become entitled to the right of citizenship.
    • The colored people were no more subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,
      • by reason of their birth here,
      than were the white children born in this country of parents who were not citizens.
    • The same rule must be applied to both races, and unless the general rule, that,
      when the parents are domiciled here,
    birth establishes the right to citizenship, is accepted,
    the Fourteenth Amendment has failed to accomplish its purpose, and
    • the colored people are not citizens.
    • The Fourteenth Amendment, by the language, 'all persons born in the United States, and
      subject to the jurisdiction thereof,'
    • was intended (Page 169 U. S. 693) to bring all races, without distinction of color,
    • within the rule which prior to that time pertained to the white race." Benny v. O'Brien (1895), 29 Vroom (58 N.J.Law), 36, 39, 40.

    The foregoing considerations and authorities irresistibly lead us to these conclusions:

    • the Fourteenth Amendment affirms the ancient and fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the territory,
      • in the allegiance and under the protection of the country,
      including all children here born of resident aliens,
      • with the exceptions or qualifications (as old as the rule itself) of children of foreign sovereigns or their ministers, or
      • born on foreign public ships, or
      • of enemies within and during a hostile occupation of part of our territory,
      • and with the single additional exception of children of members of the Indian tribes owing direct allegiance to their several tribes.
    • The Amendment,
        in clear words and in manifest intent,
    includes the children born,
    • within the territory of the United States,
    of all other persons, of whatever race or color, domiciled within the United States.
    • Every citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is
      • within the allegiance and the protection, and
      consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States.
    • His allegiance to the United States is direct and immediate,
      • and, although but local and temporary, continuing only so long as he remains within our territory, is yet,
        • in the words of Lord Coke in Calvin's Case, 7 Rep. 6a,
      • "strong enough to make a natural subject, for if he hath issue here, that issue is a natural-born subject;"
      and his child,
      • as said by Mr. Binney in his essay before quoted,
      "if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural-born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle."
    • It can hardly be denied that an alien is completely subject to the political jurisdiction of the country in which he resides
      -- seeing that,
      • as said by Mr. Webster, when Secretary of State,
        • in his Report to the President on Thrasher's Case in 1851, and since repeated by this court,
      "independently of a residence with intention to continue such residence;
      independently of any domiciliation;
      independently of the taking of any oath of allegiance or of renouncing any former allegiance,
    • it is well known that,
      • by the public law,
      an alien, or a stranger (Page 169 U. S. 694) born,
      • for so long a time as he continues within the dominions of a foreign government,
      owes obedience to the laws of that government, and
      may be punished for treason, or other crimes,
      • as a native-born subject might be,
      unless his case is varied by some treaty stipulations."
      • Ex.Doc. H.R. No. 10, 1st sess. 32d Congress, p. 4;
      • 6 Webster's Works, 56;
      • United States v. Carlisle, 16 Wall. 147, 83 U. S. 155;
      • Calvin's Case, 7 Rep. 6a;
      • Ellesmere on Postnati 63; 1 Hale P.C. 62;
      • 4 Bl.Com. 92.

    To hold that the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution excludes from citizenship the children, born in the United States, of citizens or subjects of other countries would be to deny citizenship to thousands of persons of English, Scotch, Irish, German, or other European parentage who have always been considered and treated as citizens of the United States.. . . .

    [End of United States v. Wong Kim Ark quotes Return to Footnote 10]

    United States v. Wong Kim Ark "'subject to its jurisdiction' was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States.".

    In INS v. Rios-Pineda every time the ILLEGAL alien mother's child born here was mentioned it was added "who is a citizen of the United States" and no objections in the text from other judges.

    In United States v. Wong Kim Ark such a remark going the opposite way got an immediate response and was recognized as in dictum.

    [Quote]

    Mr. Justice Miller, indeed, while discussing the causes which led to the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, made this remark:

    "The phrase, 'subject to its jurisdiction' was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States." 16 Wall. 83 U. S. 73.

    • This was wholly aside from the question in judgment and from the course of reasoning bearing upon that question.
    • It was unsupported by any argument, or by any reference to authorities, and
    • that it was not formulated with the same care and exactness
      • as if the case before the court had called for an exact definition of the phrase
      is apparent from its classing foreign ministers and consuls together
      -- whereas it was then well settled law,
      • as has since been recognized in a judgment of this court in which Mr. Justice Miller concurred, that consuls, as such,
        • and unless expressly invested with a diplomatic character in addition to their ordinary powers,
      • are not considered as entrusted with authority to represent their sovereign in his intercourse (Page 169 U. S. 679) with foreign States
      • or to vindicate his prerogatives,
      • or entitled by the law of nations to the privileges and immunities of ambassadors or public ministers,
      but are subject to
    • the jurisdiction, civil and criminal, of the courts of the country in which they reside.
      • 1 Kent Com. 44;
      • Story Conflict of Laws § 48;
      • Wheaton International Law (8th ed.) § 249;
      • The Anne (1818), 3 Wheat. 435, 16 U. S. 445, 16 U. S. 446;
      • Gittings v. Crawford (1838), Taney 1, 10;
      • In re Baiz (1890), 135 U. S. 403, 135 U. S. 424.
    • In weighing a remark uttered under such circumstances, it is well to bear in mind the often quoted words of Chief Justice Marshall:
      "It is a maxim not to be disregarded that general expressions in every opinion are to be taken in connection with the case in which those expressions are used. If they go beyond the case, they may be respected, but ought not to control the judgment in a subsequent suit when the very point is presented for decision. The reason of this maxim is obvious. The question actually before the court is investigated with care, and considered in its full extent. Other principles which may serve to illustrate it are considered in their relation to the case decided, but their possible bearing on all other cases is seldom completely investigated."
      Cohens v. Virginia (1821), 6 Wheat. 264, 19 U. S. 399.
  • Birth Rights: CITIZENSHIP AND THE CONSTITUTION

    09/04/2015 10:49:16 AM PDT · 1 of 4
    WilliamofCarmichael
    [E]ach of the thirteen states had its own rules for citizenship in that state, which then formed the basis of national citizenship. . . . the Fourteenth Amendment . . . added to the Constitution, for the first time, a definition of both national and state citizenship.

    . . . in a series of revisions in the Senate the Citizenship Clause was altered and its intention became unclear. Some legislators believed that the amendment’s new phrase, “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” meant exactly the same thing as the language in the Civil Rights Act: “not subject to any foreign power.” Senators Lyman Trumbull of Illinois and Reverdy Johnson of Maryland were very explicit on this issue. Said Trumbull:
    “What do we mean by 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States'? Not owing allegiance to anybody else; that is what it means.”

    The linked document is short, concise, and summarizes and explains much that has been in articles posted here. The reply below is about three of the cases mentioned in the article and is what I have added. Hover for some definitions.

  • Remember The Law is Only Sacred When It Furthers a Liberal Value

    09/04/2015 4:06:59 AM PDT · 5 of 29
    WilliamofCarmichael to cotton1706
    If you're unwilling to enforce the law, you shouldn't be an officer of the state.

    I'm hearing a lot of that you must put aside your personal beliefs religious and all.

    The old The Nuremberg Defense: "only following orders". What if the gay psychos and supporters pushing all this harassment stuff start ordering the killing of homophobes?

    So using Ockham's razor approach it is obvious that the lady need only say that she is doing it in support of Islam. That will immediately scare the gay psychos and the MSM employees. Problem solved.

  • Mark Levin Show,M-F,6PM-9PM,EDT,WABC AM,September 3, 2015

    09/03/2015 5:24:31 PM PDT · 16 of 17
    WilliamofCarmichael to Biggirl
    Dr. Carson

    In case some have not heard this. (less than a minute)

  • Rush Limbaugh Show,M-F,12NOONPM-3PM,EDT,WOR AM,September 2,2015

    09/02/2015 9:47:48 AM PDT · 24 of 69
    WilliamofCarmichael to Biggirl
    The Republican leadership in Congress makes this imperative:

    The Senator and Representative Background Amendment.
    All members of Congress must pass a background check; there can be nothing that can be used to threaten the Senator or Representative.
    Failure to comply is a betrayal of our Republic and of such danger to our well-being that the Court may consider violation a capital offense.
  • The Savage Nation - AUGUST 2015

    08/31/2015 12:30:42 PM PDT · 70 of 72
    WilliamofCarmichael to All
    I've posted this before..

    ". . . some key [events] exacerbated the national debate, fraying trust, and national cohesion just a little more each time . . . The two-party system that had governed America . . . began to fall apart . . . interest in politics took the place of all other forms of news-related entertainment . . . politicians were the celebrities . . . [Politics/ideology] was becoming such a habit, the reactions so automatic, that [journalists] taking sides on every news story became inevitable."

    .. This is from for Love & Liberty by Robin Young and it's a true account of the Civil War. The quote is about 1857 America.

  • Obama is accused of ´constitutional over-reach and ´insulting all Ohioans´ by ditching former

    08/31/2015 12:09:00 PM PDT · 10 of 29
    WilliamofCarmichael to Nachum
    Just in: President Obama renames Mount McKinley after himself, Denali (the high one)

    FR was down for awhile so I came 3,459,215th with this. :)

  • Rush Limbaugh Show,M-F,12NOONPM-3PM,EDT,WOR AM,August 31,2015

    08/31/2015 12:03:05 PM PDT · 28 of 33
    WilliamofCarmichael to Biggirl
    Some advice for college students who find themselves facing employees of the university who are aged 1960s Marxist-Alinsky campus radical, psycho spoiled brats:

    As you weigh in our mind how to respond appropriately remember:

    keep your ponder wry.

  • The walls Europe is building to keep people out

    08/28/2015 11:11:33 AM PDT · 5 of 6
    WilliamofCarmichael to Brad from Tennessee
    What am I missing? They are fleeing Islamists atrocities I thought. A linked article says "Thousands of refugees, most fleeing wars in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan . . . .

    Christians, Jews, and Muslims are refugees.

    American liberals.. "If I'd been living at the time of Nazi atrocities I would have put an end to it. I tell you."

    Today Islamist atrocities? No, no, no . . .where? Are you an Islamophobe?

  • When Will ABC News Release the Full Vester Flanagan Manifesto?

    08/28/2015 10:58:49 AM PDT · 4 of 27
    WilliamofCarmichael to george76
    I think you can go to any of the race-grievance industry websites or google comments of the Obama-Holder demagogues to get the sources for most of what is in the "manifesto".

    If I am correct about that seems to me the victims' families have a good case to sue the aforementioned groups using the doctrine of vicarious liability.

  • The Savage Nation - AUGUST 2015

    08/27/2015 12:29:48 PM PDT · 68 of 72
    WilliamofCarmichael to All
    I'm expected to vote for this jerk?

    Jeb Bush to Republicans: ‘Stop Acting Stupid’ on Immigration

    and I remember the contrived demise of Prop 187 (1994 passed by 60%) cheered as "the last gasp of white America in California." ~ Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party; and Jack Kemp, Jeb Bush, and William Bennett joined the celebration coming here to California to tell us Prop 187 supporters to go to hell.

  • Rush Limbaugh Show,M-F,12NOONPM-3PM,EDT,WOR AM,August 26-28,2015

    08/27/2015 11:44:50 AM PDT · 74 of 176
    WilliamofCarmichael to Biggirl
    I'm expected to vote for this jerk?

    Jeb Bush to Republicans: ‘Stop Acting Stupid’ on Immigration

    and I remember the contrived demise of Prop 187 (1994 passed by 60%) cheered as "the last gasp of white America in California." ~ Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party; and Jack Kemp, Jeb Bush, and William Bennett joined the celebration coming here to California to tell us Prop 187 supporters to go to hell.

  • Mark Levin Show,M-F,6PM-9PM,EDT,WABC AM,August 24-28,2015

    08/26/2015 3:39:25 PM PDT · 82 of 123
    WilliamofCarmichael to Biggirl
    "There must be accountability. . . ."

    What greater right is there than the right to life? Families of murder victims -- as well as victims of riot violence and ordinary street violence that can be traced to Obama-Holder demagoguery take note:

    The doctrine of vicarious liability and the Bevins decision:

    A citizen's "private right of action for monetary damages where no other federal remedy is provided for the vindication [justify a claim for the violation] of a constitutional right . . . The court reasoned based upon a presumption that where there is a violation of a right, the plaintiff can recover whatever he could recover under any civil action, unless Congress has expressly curtailed that right of recovery"

    As I understand it individual government employees such as the Presidents and the Attorney General can be sued for damages -- unless the Obama-Holder lickspittle (Congressional Republcan leaders) quickly pass laws to protect them.

    White supremacist (Tom Metzger) has been successfully sued using the doctrine of vicarious liability even though the crimes were committed by skinheads not working for, or members of the Metzger group. Just his status and influence was enough to convince a jury.

  • We’ve ignored a reason for homicides of blacks: Look at the enemy within.

    08/26/2015 11:55:27 AM PDT · 31 of 31
    WilliamofCarmichael to zeestephen
    RE: I'm not questioning the data, just the confusing way you presented it.

    You mean combining the several tables into one?

    The exceptions vis-a-vis race, ethnicity, witnesses are explained at the source.

    If you think I messed up here wait until you see this:

    Federal crime statistics are a rebuttal to the race-grievance industry lies. It'll take a long time to sort out that mess. :)

    If you do look at my thread you do have to hover the columns and headers to get descriptions and..

    some additions I made using replies have more FBI and DoJ data.

  • We’ve ignored a reason for homicides of blacks: Look at the enemy within.

    08/26/2015 4:31:51 AM PDT · 26 of 31
    WilliamofCarmichael to zeestephen
    Yes a subset.. I included links to the FBI sources. The explanations are there for all who trouble themselves to view. For example..

    A visit to one of the FBI Table Six data reveals the totals are representative of those agencies that provide race and ethnicity breakdowns. Not all agencies provide the data.

    So the FBI freely admits the data for FBI Table Six are a subset and the FBI provides details about the data that are available to the FBI.. here is copy of information available from the FBI at the link I provided for 2013. All the other links to FBI data for the respective years show similar information.

    [2013] Overview

    • Of the 12,253 murder victims in 2013 for which supplemental data were received, most (77.7 percent) were male. (Based on Expanded Homicide Data Table 1.)
    • Concerning murder victims for whom race was known, 51.7 percent were black, 45.7 percent were white, and 2.5 percent were of other races. Race was unknown for 147 victims. (Based on Expanded Homicide Data Table 2.)
    • Nearly 47 percent (46.7) of all murders for which the UCR Program received supplemental data were single victim/single offender situations. (See Expanded Homicide Data Table 4.)
    • Of the offenders for whom gender was known, 89.3 percent were male. (Based on Expanded Homicide Data Table 3.)
    • An examination of data regarding the offenders for whom race was known showed that 53.6 percent were black, 43.9 percent were white, and 2.5 percent were of other races. The race was unknown for 4,112 offenders. (Based on Expanded Homicide Data Table 3.)
    • Sixty-nine percent of the homicides for which the FBI received weapons data in 2013 involved the use of firearms. Handguns comprised 68.4 percent of the firearms used in murder and nonnegligent manslaughter incidents in 2013. (Based on Expanded Homicide Data Table 8.)
    • In incidents of murder for which the relationships of murder victims and offenders were known, 55.9 percent were killed by someone they knew (acquaintance, neighbor, friend, boyfriend, etc.); 24.9 percent of victims were slain by family members. The relationship of murder victims and offenders was unknown in 45.5 percent of murder and nonnegligent manslaughter incidents in 2013. (Based on Expanded Homicide Data Table 10.)
    • Of the female murder victims for whom the relationships to their offenders were known, 36.6 percent were murdered by their husbands or boyfriends. (Based on Expanded Homicide Data Tables 2 and 10.)
    • Of the murders for which the circumstances surrounding the crimes were known, 39.6 percent of victims were murdered during arguments (including romantic triangles) in 2013. Felony circumstances (rape, robbery, burglary, etc.) accounted for 24.4 percent of murders. Circumstances were unknown for 36.2 percent of reported homicides. (Based on Expanded Homicide Data Table 11.)
    • Law enforcement reported 742 justifiable homicides in 2013. Of those, law enforcement officers justifiably killed 461 felons, and private citizens justifiably killed 281 people during the commission of crimes. (See Expanded Homicide Data Tables 14 and 15.)
  • We’ve ignored a reason for homicides of blacks: Look at the enemy within.

    08/25/2015 9:55:27 PM PDT · 22 of 31
    WilliamofCarmichael to markomalley
    She desperately needs people who can win the trust of the troublemakers where they live and send them a message in terms they can understand: Black people cannot win the war on racism when black people are dying at the hands of other black people.

    Black people cannot win the war on racism [i.e., white people] given the FBI statistics about white homicides at the hands of black people -- whites outnumber blacks by at least six to one.

    Expanded Homicide Data
    Table 6 data for multiple years.

    FBI Homicides Statistics

    Year of
    Stats
    Race of
    Victims

    Total
    White
    Offenders
    Black
    Offenders
    Unknown
    & other
    2013
    White
    3,005
    2,509
    409
    87
    Black
    2,491
    189
    2,245
    57
    2012
    White
    3,128
    2,614
    431
    83
    Black
    2,648
    193
    2,412
    43
    2011
    White
    3,172
    2,630
    448
    94
    Black
    2,695
    193
    2,447
    55
    2010
    White
    3,327
    2,777
    447
    103
    Black
    2,720
    218
    2,459
    43
    2009
    White
    3,518
    2,963
    454
    101
    Black
    2,867
    209
    2,604
    54
    2008
    White
    3,643
    3,036
    504
    103
    Black
    3,024
    230
    2,722
    72
    2007
    White
    3,587
    2,918
    566
    103
    Black
    3,221
    245
    2,905
    71
    2006
    White
    3,709
    3,026
    573
    110
    Black
    3,303
    208
    3,034
    61
    2005
    White
    3,785
    3,150
    516
    119
    Black
    3,289
    230
    2,984
    75
    2004
    White
    3,727
    3,123
    522
    85
    Black
    3,067
    228
    2,784
    55
    1995
    White
    4,954
    4,124
    699
    131
    Black
    4,764
    281
    4,422
    61

    I did not find data for the years 1996 through 2003

    www.fbi.gov About Us CJIS UCR Crime in the U.S. Here's the links to most of the FBI tables I referenced above.

    Expanded Homicide Data Table 6—“Murder, Race, Ethnicity, and Sex of Victim by Race and Sex of Offender, 2013 [Single victim/single offender]”

    Here's 2013 Click on: Expanded Homicide Data Table 6—“Murder, Race, Ethnicity, and Sex of Victim by Race and Sex of Offender, 2013 [Single victim/single offender]”

    Here's 2012

    Here's 2011

    Here's 2010

    Here's 2009

    • choose Continue to Crime in the United States, 2009
    • choose Homicides
    • choose Expanded Homicide Data Table 6

    Here's 2008

    Here's 2007

    • choose Homicides
    • choose Expanded Homicide Data Tables / Table 5

    Here's 2006

    • choose Expanded Homicide Data
    • choose Expanded Homicide Table 5

    Here's 2005

    • choose Expanded Homicide Data
    • choose Expanded Homicide Data Table 5

    It is long past the time when facts should be made public to expose the lies and misrepresentations of the Obama-Holder demagogues and the race-grievance industry.The Obama-Holder demagogues, the race-grievance industry, and most employees of the MSM have made this a racial issue. So let's see..

    So adding up the blacks killed by whites (Col 1) and whites killed by blacks(col 2). Surprise.

    col 1 Col 2
    189 409
    193 431
    193 448
    218 447
    209 454
    230 504
    245 566
    208 573
    230 516
    228 522
    281 699
    2424 5569

    Whites outnumber blacks by at least six-to-one.

  • Chinese shares drop in dramatic slide

    08/23/2015 9:53:42 PM PDT · 16 of 59
    WilliamofCarmichael to TigerClaws
    Simon Littlewood, president at business advisory firm ACG Global told the BBC there were concerns that the world's second biggest economy was "a one-trick pony as they have been trying repeatedly over the past few months to put more liquidity into their economy", yet so far have failed to calm markets.

    I recall seeing articles over the past year or so about wealthy Chinese moving the liquidity (money) OUT of Red Chins -- I think most wealth is in the hands of Communist Party members so that ought to suggest what's really going on. Total collapse? Border-to-border Tiananmen Square? Revolution? Mao coming back.

    No more Red China is a hell of a lot better than war with them.

  • The Savage Nation - AUGUST 2015

    08/21/2015 4:34:17 PM PDT · 62 of 72
    WilliamofCarmichael to dynachrome

    Thanks for the information. Those two together . . . .

  • Rush Limbaugh Show,EDT,M-F,12NOONPM-3PM,WOR AM,August 17-21, 2015

    08/21/2015 9:36:44 AM PDT · 214 of 250
    WilliamofCarmichael to All
    U.S. Supreme Court

    INS v. Rios-Pineda, 471 U.S. 444 (1985)

    Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Rios-Pineda

    No. 83-2032

    Argued March 20, 1985

    Decided May 13, 1985

    471 U.S. 444

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

    EIGHTH CIRCUIT

    Syllabus [excerpt]

    • Respondent husband was apprehended in 1978, and,
      • although at his request he was granted permission to return voluntarily to Mexico in lieu of deportation,
      • he refused to leave as promised.
    • Deportation proceedings were then instituted against respondents,
      • who by that time had a child, who,
        • being born in the United States,
      • was a United States citizen.
    [end excerpt]

    I'm a slow reader so I figured why not add my little ul's and li's as I go. Then I can read the formatted version and pretend that I am a fast reader.

    Being born here means you are a citizen was just kind of gratuitous dropped into this case of an ILLEGAL alien couple being deported and appealing the decision.

    The procedure did not raise the question it just some someone typed in that IT IS SO THAT the illegal alien couple's children born here are citizens.

    Is this sort of an aside comment how all that citizens-for-all-born here got started?

    By the time the Respondents made several frivolous appeals following this there was a second child born here and it too is assumed by this document to be a citizen.

  • Mark Levin Show,M-F,6PM-9PM,EDT,WABC AM,August 17-21,2015

    08/20/2015 5:03:20 PM PDT · 93 of 107
    WilliamofCarmichael to Biggirl
    U.S. Supreme Court

    INS v. Rios-Pineda, 471 U.S. 444 (1985)

    Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Rios-Pineda

    No. 83-2032

    Argued March 20, 1985

    Decided May 13, 1985

    471 U.S. 444

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

    EIGHTH CIRCUIT

    Syllabus [excerpt]

    • Respondent husband was apprehended in 1978, and,
      • although at his request he was granted permission to return voluntarily to Mexico in lieu of deportation,
      • he refused to leave as promised.
    • Deportation proceedings were then instituted against respondents,
      • who by that time had a child, who,
        • being born in the United States,
      • was a United States citizen.
    [end excerpt]

    I'm a slow reader so I figured why not add my little ul's and li's as I go. Then I can read the formatted version and pretend that I am a fast reader.

    IIRC Levin said INS v. Rios-Pineda, 471 U.S. 444 (1985) was not about anchor babies. That of course is true but nevertheless throughout the document it's assumed, it seems to me, that the illegal alien couple's children who were born here are citizens. Is this sort of an aside comment how all that citizens-for-all-born here got started?

    By the time the Respondents made several frivolous appeals following this there was a second child born here and it too is assumed by this document to be a citizen.

  • The Savage Nation - AUGUST 2015

    08/20/2015 1:11:16 PM PDT · 59 of 72
    WilliamofCarmichael to All
    When G.W. Bush was president Mexico officials stated their demands for any kind of deal with the U.S.
    • there had to be regularization,
      • a concept that Foreign Minister Jorge G. Castañeda says must allow Mexican immigrants to
        • obtain driver's licenses,
        • Social Security cards and
        • resident tuition at colleges.
      • Mexican officials knew better than to say amnesty.

    Castañeda imposed the requirement that

    • any comprehensive agreement on border safety and
    • guest workers must
      • include regularization for illegal workers.
      • "It's the whole enchilada, or nothing," Mr. Castañeda said.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/629273/posts

    Mexican immigrants
    • obtain driver's licenses,
    • Social Security cards and
    • resident tuition at colleges.

    Looks like recent news articles from around the country.

    Trump to Mexico: "F-you."

    Americans to Trump: "Good!"

  • Protests in St. Louis after police shooting of suspect, 18

    08/20/2015 10:56:39 AM PDT · 16 of 16
    WilliamofCarmichael to struggle
    RE: He pointed a gun at cops. What do you expect cops to do?

    I know! I know!

    The race grievance industry and the Obama-Holder demagogues could start another group called:

    Just Brandishing. Don't Shoot!

  • Birthright Citizenship -- A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment

    08/19/2015 8:40:48 PM PDT · 22 of 22
    WilliamofCarmichael to qaz123

    Thanks for the links. I think all FReepers are aware of the same problems in their respective states.

  • Trump’s Immigration Plan Is Hardcore Porn For Nativists

    08/19/2015 8:32:01 PM PDT · 20 of 27
    WilliamofCarmichael to All
    The real concern is wealth.

    There's a lot of gold in them thar' political campaigns and in his rage the author seems a little too cute --

    he dumped the snark on millions of true Americans

    who do NOT accept that it is okay to use politics as a source of wealth for the employees of political parties and campaigns.

    Void the bowels of Washington, D.C. 2016

  • Trump’s Immigration Plan Is Hardcore Porn For Nativists

    08/19/2015 8:18:46 PM PDT · 19 of 27
    WilliamofCarmichael to 2ndDivisionVet
    It would need to hire 10,000 federal employees to bring in these [millions of] people [and deport them]."

    Here's Mr. Trump's plan.

    Round up and deporting is only for gangbangers and criminals.

    Maybe the author of the posted article supports the Hispanics gangbangers and that's what he hates about the plan.

    [quote]

    • Mandatory return of all criminal aliens.
      • The Obama Administration has released 76,000 aliens from its custody with criminal convictions since 2013 alone.
      • All criminal aliens must be returned to their home countries,
      • a process which can be aided by
        • canceling any visas to foreign countries which will not accept their own criminals, and
        • making it a separate and additional crime to commit an offense while here illegally.
    • Detention—not catch-and-release.
      • Illegal aliens apprehended crossing the border must be detained until they are sent home,
      • no more catch-and-release.
    • Defund sanctuary cities.
      • Cut-off federal grants to any city which refuses to cooperate with federal law enforcement.
    • Enhanced penalties for overstaying a visa.
      • Millions of people come to the United States on temporary visas but
        • refuse to leave,
        • without consequence.
      • This is a threat to national security.
      • Individuals who refuse to leave at the time their visa expires should be subject to criminal penalties;
      • this will also help give local jurisdictions the power to hold visa overstays until federal authorities arrive.
      • Completion of a visa tracking system – required by law but blocked by lobbyists – will be necessary as well.
    • Cooperate with local gang task forces.
      • ICE officers should accompany local police departments conducting raids of violent street gangs
        • like MS-13 and
        • the 18th street gang,
      • which have terrorized the country.
      • All illegal aliens in gangs should be
        • apprehended and
        • deported.
      • Again, quoting Chris Crane:
        • “ICE Officers and Agents are forced to apply the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Directive,
          • not to children in schools, but
          • to adult inmates in jails.
        • If an illegal-alien inmate simply claims eligibility,
        • ICE is forced to release the alien back into the community.
        • This includes serious criminals
          • who have committed felonies,
          • who have assaulted officers, and
          • who prey on children…
        • ICE officers should be required to place detainers on every illegal alien they encounter in
          • jails and
          • prisons,
        • since these aliens
          • not only violated immigration laws, but
          • then went on to engage in activities that led to their arrest by police;
        • ICE officers should be required to issue Notices to Appear to all illegal aliens with
          • criminal convictions,
          • DUI convictions, or
          • a gang affiliation;
        • ICE should be working with
          • any state or
          • local drug or
          • gang task force
        • that asks for such assistance.”
    [end quote]
  • Trump’s Immigration Plan Is Hardcore Porn For Nativists

    08/19/2015 7:59:07 PM PDT · 15 of 27
    WilliamofCarmichael to 2ndDivisionVet
    Because, as you all know, no one has ever tackled this issue before ever, or so goes the myth spun by the same people who earnestly tell you that Jeb Bush is a Trotskyite but Donald Trump is the second-coming of Ronald Reagan.

    Jeb was well aware of the issue.. he was out here in California in the 1990s calling us Save Our State (Proposition 187) supporters stupid, racists, xenophobes .. so yeah he's a Trotskyite and no Reagan. Ronald Reagan never called me names -- especially for believing in our borders and culture.

  • Birthright Citizenship -- A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment

    08/19/2015 5:45:28 PM PDT · 12 of 22
    WilliamofCarmichael to familyop
    I do not understand the meaning of your last two replies.

    Nazis?

    The 14th Amendment? That's what the article is about especially the meaning of jurisdiction.

  • Birthright Citizenship -- A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment

    08/19/2015 4:40:48 PM PDT · 5 of 22
    WilliamofCarmichael to RIghtwardHo
    Though I believe that the text is 100 percent the same as the original article the way I formatted it could have changed the intended meaning.

    I just heard on the radio others emphasize

    • “the distinction between partial, territorial jurisdiction,
      • which subjects all who are present within the territory of a sovereign
      • to the jurisdiction of that sovereign’s laws,
      and
    • complete political jurisdiction,
      • which requires allegiance to the sovereign as well.”

    Isn't the absence of allegiance enough to deny citizenship without having to amend the 14th?

  • Birthright Citizenship -- A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment

    08/19/2015 4:10:30 PM PDT · 2 of 22
    WilliamofCarmichael to drpix
    .. and I posted the text of the article with my emphasis in the form of HTML LIST formatting. I hope no one objects. Link to the FR thread containing this 2011 article here

    Birthright Citizenship -- A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment

    By Hans A. von Spakovsky Published January 14, 2011 FoxNews.com

    What’s the citizenship status of the children of illegal aliens? That question has spurred quite a debate over the 14th Amendment lately,

    • with the news that several states, including
      • Pennsylvania,
      • Arizona,
      • Oklahoma,
      • Georgia and
      • South Carolina,
    • may launch efforts to deny automatic citizenship to such children.

    Critics claim that

    • anyone born in the United States is automatically a U.S. citizen, even if their parents are here illegally.
    • But that ignores the text and
    • legislative history of the 14th Amendment,
    • which was ratified in 1868 to extend citizenship to
      • freed slaves and
      • their children.

    The 14th Amendment doesn’t say that all persons born in the U.S. are citizens. It says that

    • “[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States and
    • subject to the jurisdiction thereof”
    • are citizens.
    • That
      • second,
      • critical,
      • conditional phrase
      is conveniently ignored or
    • misinterpreted by advocates of “birthright” citizenship.

    Critics erroneously believe that

    • anyone present in the United States has
    • “subjected” himself “to the jurisdiction” of the United States, which
    • would extend citizenship to the children of
      • tourists,
      • diplomats, and
      • illegal aliens alike.

    But that is not what that qualifying phrase means. Its original meaning

    • refers to the political allegiance of an individual and
    • the jurisdiction that a foreign government has over that individual.
    • The fact that a tourist or
    • illegal alien is subject to
      • our laws and
      • our courts
      • if they violate our laws
    • does not place them within the political “jurisdiction” of the United States
    • as that phrase was defined by the framers of the 14th Amendment.
    • This amendment’s language was derived from
      • the 1866 Civil Rights Act, which provided that
        • “[a]ll persons born in the United States, and
        • not subject to any foreign power”
      • would be considered citizens.
      • Sen. Lyman Trumbull,
        • a key figure in the adoption of the 14th Amendment,
        said that
      • “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. included not owing allegiance to any other country.

    As John Eastman, former Dean of the Chapman School of Law, has said, many do not seem to understand

    • “the distinction between partial, territorial jurisdiction,
      • which subjects all who are present within the territory of a sovereign
      • to the jurisdiction of that sovereign’s laws,
      and
    • complete political jurisdiction,
      • which requires allegiance to the sovereign as well.”

    In the famous Slaughter-House cases of 1872, the Supreme Court stated that

    • this qualifying phrase was intended to
    • exclude
      • “children of ministers,
      • consuls, and
      • citizens or
      • subjects of foreign States born within the United States.”
    • This was confirmed in 1884 in another case,
      • Elk vs. Wilkins,
    • when citizenship was denied to an American Indian because
      • he “owed immediate allegiance to” his tribe and
      • not the United States.

    American Indians and their children

    • did not become citizens until Congress passed the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.
    • There would have been no need to pass such legislation if
      • the 14th Amendment extended citizenship to every person born in America,
      • no matter what the circumstances of their birth, and
      • no matter who their parents are.

    Even in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark,

    • the 1898 case most often cited by “birthright” supporters due to its overbroad language,
    • the Court only held that
      • a child born of lawful, permanent residents
      • was a U.S. citizen.
    • That is a far cry from saying that a child born of individuals
      • who are here illegally
    • must be considered a U.S. citizen.

    Of course,

    • the judges in that case were strongly influenced by the fact that
      • there were discriminatory laws in place at that time
        • that restricted Chinese immigration,
      • a situation that does not exist today.
    • The Court’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment
      • as extending to the children of legal, noncitizens
    • was incorrect,
      • according to the text and
      • legislative history of the amendment.
    • But even under that holding,
    • citizenship was not extended to the children of illegal aliens –
    • only permanent, legal residents.

    It is just plain wrong to claim that

    • the children born of parents
      • temporarily in the country as students or
      • tourists
    • are automatically U.S. citizens:
    • They do not meet the 14th Amendment’s jurisdictional allegiance obligations.
    • They are, in fact, subject to the political jurisdiction (and allegiance) of the country of their parents.
    • The same applies to the children of illegal aliens because
      • children born in the United States to foreign citizens are
      • citizens of their parents’ home country.

    Federal law offers them no help either. U.S. immigration law (8 U.S.C. § 1401) simply

    • repeats the language of the 14th Amendment, including the phrase
      • “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
    • The State Department has erroneously interpreted that statute to
      • provide passports to anyone born in the United States,
      • regardless of whether their parents are here illegally and
      • regardless of whether the applicant meets the requirement of being “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S.
    • Accordingly, birthright citizenship has been implemented by executive fiat, not because it is
      • required by federal law or
      • the Constitution.

    We are only one of a very small number of countries that

    • provides birthright citizenship, and
    • we do so based not upon the requirements of federal law or the Constitution,
    • but based upon an erroneous executive interpretation.
    • Congress should clarify the law according to the original meaning of the 14th Amendment and
    • reverse this practice.
    Hans A. von Spakovsky is a Senior Legal Fellow at the Heritage Foundation and a former Justice Department official. Hans A. von Spakovsky is a former Justice Department official. He is the co-author, with John Fund of "Obama's Enforcer: Eric Holder's Justice Department" (Broadside/HarperCollins 2014). He is Manager, Election Law Reform Initiative and Senior Legal Fellow at the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation.
  • Birthright Citizenship -- A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment

    08/19/2015 4:07:45 PM PDT · 1 of 22
    WilliamofCarmichael
    I will post the text below.
  • Rush Limbaugh Show,EDT,M-F,12NOONPM-3PM,WOR AM,August 17-21, 2015

    08/19/2015 10:20:29 AM PDT · 155 of 250
    WilliamofCarmichael to All
    I repeat my post from yesterday because again Rush says it is not immigration it's an invasion..

    anyone who has followed the news over the past several years knows that

    • tens of millions of people emigrating did not happen under the noses of their governments;
    • if it is not strictly an invasion
      • it definitely serves as a safety value benefiting the respective countries and
      • it is those countries' disrespectful interference in our public affairs.

    Here is a brief outline of the events beginning in the 1980s including sources.

    Arturo Sarukhan, a top Mexican foreign ministry official: “How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.”.

    The advantages for some Americans are votes and taxpayer subsidized cheap and servile labor.

    (Watch what happens should it ever becomes legal labor.. IMO Hispanic unions would take over everything.)

  • Good Grief–Media Lies, AGAIN, About Trump’s Illegal Alien Proposals–Completely Manufactured Claims…

    08/19/2015 4:59:55 AM PDT · 8 of 12
    WilliamofCarmichael to 2ndDivisionVet
    Let the MSM employees provide proof. Here's a copy of what was published as part of Mr. Trump's plan.

    Maybe the MSM employees support the Hispanic gangbangers that's who they defend against the evil Americans.

    [quote]

    • Mandatory return of all criminal aliens.
      • The Obama Administration has released 76,000 aliens from its custody with criminal convictions since 2013 alone.
      • All criminal aliens must be returned to their home countries,
      • a process which can be aided by
        • canceling any visas to foreign countries which will not accept their own criminals, and
        • making it a separate and additional crime to commit an offense while here illegally.
    • Detention—not catch-and-release.
      • Illegal aliens apprehended crossing the border must be detained until they are sent home,
      • no more catch-and-release.
    • Defund sanctuary cities.
      • Cut-off federal grants to any city which refuses to cooperate with federal law enforcement.
    • Enhanced penalties for overstaying a visa.
      • Millions of people come to the United States on temporary visas but
        • refuse to leave,
        • without consequence.
      • This is a threat to national security.
      • Individuals who refuse to leave at the time their visa expires should be subject to criminal penalties;
      • this will also help give local jurisdictions the power to hold visa overstays until federal authorities arrive.
      • Completion of a visa tracking system – required by law but blocked by lobbyists – will be necessary as well.
    • Cooperate with local gang task forces.
      • ICE officers should accompany local police departments conducting raids of violent street gangs
        • like MS-13 and
        • the 18th street gang,
      • which have terrorized the country.
      • All illegal aliens in gangs should be
        • apprehended and
        • deported.
      • Again, quoting Chris Crane:
        • “ICE Officers and Agents are forced to apply the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Directive,
          • not to children in schools, but
          • to adult inmates in jails.
        • If an illegal-alien inmate simply claims eligibility,
        • ICE is forced to release the alien back into the community.
        • This includes serious criminals
          • who have committed felonies,
          • who have assaulted officers, and
          • who prey on children…
        • ICE officers should be required to place detainers on every illegal alien they encounter in
          • jails and
          • prisons,
        • since these aliens
          • not only violated immigration laws, but
          • then went on to engage in activities that led to their arrest by police;
        • ICE officers should be required to issue Notices to Appear to all illegal aliens with
          • criminal convictions,
          • DUI convictions, or
          • a gang affiliation;
        • ICE should be working with
          • any state or
          • local drug or
          • gang task force
        • that asks for such assistance.”
    • End birthright citizenship.
      • This remains the biggest magnet for illegal immigration.
      • By a 2:1 margin, voters say it’s the wrong policy,
      • including Harry Reid who said “no sane country” would give automatic citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants.
    [end quote]

    Then it goes on to support American citizen and legal resident vs. illegal Aliens and imported foreign workers.

  • Trump immigration plan called ‘anti-business’

    08/18/2015 8:32:57 PM PDT · 18 of 42
    WilliamofCarmichael to 2ndDivisionVet
    I copied the Trump plan word-for-word and formatted it with HTML to make it (IMO) easier to read and understand.

    It's the original Trump proposal but in a kind of outline format (IMO) easier to read and understand.

    Mr. Trump is right. Mexico’s leaders have been taking advantage of the United States.

    I put together a brief outline of the events including sources.

    Arturo Sarukhan, a top Mexican foreign ministry official: “How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.”.

  • Mark Levin Show,M-F,6PM-9PM,EDT,WABC AM,August 17-21,2015

    08/18/2015 4:24:12 PM PDT · 36 of 107
    WilliamofCarmichael to smokingfrog
    I'm late tuning in.. so just in case a similar point has not been made..

    a caller on another talk show made a great point vis-a-vis separating non-citizen parents from American-citizen children. The horror, the unfairness, the inhumanity .. the, the.. no big deal.

    It happens everyday to American-citizen parents and American-citizen children by way of actions of the child protective squads -- they are reported often as over reacting.

  • Thugs Rob Woman of 72-yrs Before Sucker Punching Her in Church

    08/18/2015 1:41:35 PM PDT · 27 of 47
    WilliamofCarmichael to TigerClaws
    Go here http://www.bjs.gov/

    From the Data Analysis Tools dropdown menu (do not click) select

    • View Dynamic Tools (do not click)
    • Select Arrest Data Analysis Tool
    • On the Arrest Data Analysis Tool page
    • Select National Estimates
    • select from among
      • Annual Tables
      • Trend Graphs by Sex
      • Trend Tables by Sex
      • Trend Graphs by Race
      • Trend Tables by Race
      • Age-Arrest Curves

    I chose Trend Tables by Race and selected the items I wanted on the table.

    U.S. Arrest Estimates

    Arrest Rates of Blacks

    Offense 2009 2010 2011 2012
    Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter 14.8 12.9 12.5 12.8
    Population 41,009,869 42,195,018 42,689,217 43,198,670

    Arrest Rates of Whites

    Offense 2009 2010 2011 2012
    Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.1
    Population 246,622,506 245,747,686 246,957,553 248,166,287

    Arrest Rates of Blacks

    Offense 2009 2010 2011 2012
    Forcible Rape 16.4 14.9 14.5 13.6
    Population 41,009,869 42,195,018 42,689,217 43,198,670

    Arrest Rates of Whites

    Offense 2009 2010 2011 2012
    Forcible Rape 5.7 5.4 5.2 4.7
    Population 246,622,506 245,747,686 246,957,553 248,166,287

    These are only two pf the several crime categories available

    Enough already of the race-grievance industry, Obama-Holder demagogues, and MSM employees' lies that crime consists almost exclusively of white policemen, white neighborhood watch, and whites in general violence against Black Americans. The facts show something entirely different.

    More federal stats with links to sources that contain the truth about crime Hover the columns and headers for descriptions. See UCR 18 and under stats.. though whites outnumber blacks by at least six-to-one black under 18 violent crimes outnumber white 18 and under violent crime. Columns 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4

  • Rubio: Trump immigration plan has no chance in Congress

    08/18/2015 12:36:44 PM PDT · 68 of 111
    WilliamofCarmichael to FourtySeven
    You are welcome. And thank you.

    It's the kind of computer stuff (mainframes) that I did during my 30-year extinguished career and I have the time to do it now.

  • Trump Is Crushing The GOP Field…And His The Young Turks Ban

    08/18/2015 12:29:02 PM PDT · 17 of 40
    WilliamofCarmichael to freddy005
    At the end he said that Trump could actually be elected..

    Am I the only one who remembers mau-mauing?

    1960s street mobs along with campus radical, psycho spoiled brats many of whom along with their ideological litters are now the Establishment.

    It's their tactic:

    mau-mauing.

    meaning.. "to intimidate by hostile confrontation or threats"

    See "Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers" by Tom Wolfe

    There's going to be more of the confrontations like at the Sanders rally. And they will increasingly turn violent.

    There will much cheering from the MSM employees when it starts happening to Trump and Republicans.

  • The Savage Nation - AUGUST 2015

  • Rubio: Trump immigration plan has no chance in Congress

  • Rush Limbaugh Show,EDT,M-F,12NOONPM-3PM,WOR AM,August 17-21, 2015

  • Woman planning **** Your Flag” Day on 9/11 says, ‘All White People Must Die’

    08/18/2015 10:13:01 AM PDT · 26 of 64
    WilliamofCarmichael to lbryce
    ‘All White People Must Die’

    "Hey! That's my line!" Oprah Winfrey.

    Oprah: old racists ‘have to die’ to achieve racial progress

    “There are still generations of people, older people, who were born and bred and marinated in it – in that prejudice and racism – and they just have to die.”

  • Mark Levin Show,M-F,6PM-9PM,EDT,WABC AM,August 17-21,2015

    08/17/2015 5:57:34 PM PDT · 15 of 107
    WilliamofCarmichael to All
    I also remember the stagflation. I remember someone buying a house with a 22 percent mortgage.

    Inflation was 12 - 13 percent IIRC.

    This was the Carter years at the time when the Marxist-Alinsky campus radical, psycho spoiled brats assumed control of the Democratic Party. The "neo-cons" fled the Party. Neo-cons is what the more extremist liberals called them.

    At the beginning of the Reagan Adm. the Fed's Paul Volcker had to choose between high unemployment or high inflation monetary policy. He chose the former IIRC. A couple years later things were going fine.

    My point: America as Churchill said, always does the right thing.. after they've tried everything else.

    We tried the America of the Marxist-Alinsky campus radical, psycho spoiled brats and their Democratic Party. Time to clear the buildings they occupy on the Beltway campus and be rid of them all.

  • Mark Levin Show,M-F,6PM-9PM,EDT,WABC AM,August 17-21,2015

    08/17/2015 5:19:59 PM PDT · 14 of 107
    WilliamofCarmichael to Biggirl
    I am not arguing with the host.. I do recall the end of the W.W.II. however
    • A loaf of name-brand bread was twenty-five cents
    • a gallon of milk was about fifty cents
    • the average annual salary was $3,600
    • the "progressives" loved their Uncle Joe in Moscow
    • socialist Norman Thomas was a presidential candidate to offer liberals a non-Communist alternative

    . . . at the end of WW II the debt/GDP ratio was well above 100 percent.

    consumer price index - an index of the variation in prices paid by typical consumers for retail goods and other items.

    Inflation.

    Your grandchildren will be paying $30 for a loaf of bread struggling to get by on an annual salary of $400,000.00.

    Could be.

    There used to be a coin called a mill equal to 1/1000 of a U.S. dollar or 1/10 of a cent. (A little before my time.)

    There used to be a coin called . . . .

  • Watch Google's terrifying humanoid robot running through a forest as firm pledges it will soon [tr]

    08/17/2015 2:58:47 PM PDT · 41 of 59
    WilliamofCarmichael to C19fan

    I saw it walking on those rock.. I’d like to see it try to walk across one of the streets here in Sacramento.

  • IMMIGRATION REFORM THAT WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

    08/17/2015 12:08:21 PM PDT · 23 of 23
    WilliamofCarmichael to ought-six

    Thanks. I caught this one “. . . we need to companies . . . .” but missed the others.

  • Black Lives Matter Two Big Mistakes: For the Record (Protest Trump & Santorum, not Bernie!)

    08/17/2015 4:35:44 AM PDT · 22 of 24
    WilliamofCarmichael to 2ndDivisionVet
    It would be different if it were a Donald Trump rally or a Rick Santorum event. These two guys are out of touch with the real world, have no idea what it’s like to be a part of the minority and don’t have to fear for their lives every time they see a police officer.

    Am I the only one who remembers mau-mauing?

    1960s street mobs along with campus radical, psycho spoiled brats many of whom along with their ideological litters are now the Establishment.

    It's their tactic:

    mau-mauing.

    meaning.. "to intimidate by hostile confrontation or threats"

    See "Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers" by Tom Wolfe

    The author of the posted article seems to be a critic but if it is directed at right-wingers then okay.

    RE: Black American have to "fear for their lives every time they see a police officer"

    Maybe they should consider a reason that some policemen are wary.

    Go here http://www.bjs.gov/

    From the Data Analysis Tools dropdown menu (do not click) select

    • View Dynamic Tools (do not click)
    • Select Arrest Data Analysis Tool
    • On the Arrest Data Analysis Tool page
    • Select National Estimates
    • select from among
      • Annual Tables
      • Trend Graphs by Sex
      • Trend Tables by Sex
      • Trend Graphs by Race
      • Trend Tables by Race
      • Age-Arrest Curves

    I chose Trend Tables by Race and selected the items I wanted on the table.

    U.S. Arrest Estimates

    Arrest Rates of Blacks

    Offense 2009 2010 2011 2012
    Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter 14.8 12.9 12.5 12.8
    Population 41,009,869 42,195,018 42,689,217 43,198,670

    Arrest Rates of Whites

    Offense 2009 2010 2011 2012
    Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.1
    Population 246,622,506 245,747,686 246,957,553 248,166,287

    Arrest Rates of Blacks

    Offense 2009 2010 2011 2012
    Forcible Rape 16.4 14.9 14.5 13.6
    Population 41,009,869 42,195,018 42,689,217 43,198,670

    Arrest Rates of Whites

    Offense 2009 2010 2011 2012
    Forcible Rape 5.7 5.4 5.2 4.7
    Population 246,622,506 245,747,686 246,957,553 248,166,287

    These are only two pf the several crime categories available

    Enough already of the race-grievance industry, Obama-Holder demagogues, and MSM employees' lies that crime consists almost exclusively of white policemen, white neighborhood watch, and whites in general violence against Black Americans. The facts show something entirely different.

    More federal stats with links to sources that contain the truth about crime

  • IMMIGRATION REFORM THAT WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

    08/17/2015 4:07:39 AM PDT · 15 of 23
    WilliamofCarmichael to ought-six

    If the typos and errors are only in what I posted maybe they are my mistakes. Do you mind mentioning the typos and errors?

  • IMMIGRATION REFORM THAT WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

    08/16/2015 11:08:02 PM PDT · 2 of 23
    WilliamofCarmichael to WilliamofCarmichael
    IMMIGRATION REFORM THAT WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

    The three core principles of Donald J. Trump’s immigration plan.

    When politicians talk about “immigration reform” they mean:

    • amnesty,
    • cheap labor and
    • open borders.
    • The Schumer-Rubio immigration bill was
      • nothing more than a giveaway to the corporate patrons who run both parties.

    Real immigration reform

    • puts the needs of working people first –
    • not wealthy globetrotting donors.
    • We are the only country in the world whose immigration system
      • puts the needs of other nations ahead of our own.

    That must change. Here are the three core principles of real immigration reform:

    1. A nation without borders is not a nation.
      • There must be a wall across the southern border.
    2. A nation without laws is not a nation.
      • Laws passed in accordance with our Constitutional system of government must be enforced.
    3. A nation that does not serve its own citizens is not a nation.
      • Any immigration plan must
        • improve jobs,
        • wages and
        • security
      • for all Americans.

    Make Mexico Pay For The Wall

    For many years,

    • Mexico’s leaders have been
      • taking advantage of the United States
        • by using illegal immigration to
          • export the crime and
          • poverty in their own country (as well as in other Latin American countries).
        • They have even published pamphlets on how to illegally immigrate to the United States.
        • The costs for the United States have been extraordinary:
          • U.S. taxpayers have been asked to pick up hundreds of billions in
            • healthcare costs,
            • housing costs,
            • education costs,
            • welfare costs, etc.
          • Indeed,
            • the annual cost of free tax credits alone paid to illegal immigrants quadrupled to $4.2 billion in 2011.
          • The effects on jobseekers have also been disastrous, and
            • black Americans have been particularly harmed.
    [see "immigration reform" from Mexico's perspective.]

    The impact in terms of crime has been tragic. In recent weeks,

    • the headlines have been covered with cases of criminals
      • who crossed our border illegally
      • only to go on to commit horrific crimes against Americans.
      • Most recently, an illegal immigrant from Mexico,
        • with a long arrest record,
      • is charged with
        • breaking into a 64 year-old women’s home,
        • crushing her
          • skull and
          • eye sockets
        • with a hammer,
        • raping her, and
        • murdering her.
    The Police Chief in Santa Maria says the “blood trail” leads straight to Washington.

    In 2011, the Government Accountability Office found that

    • there were a shocking 3 million arrests attached to the incarcerated alien population, including tens of thousands of
      • violent beatings,
      • rapes and
      • murders.

    Meanwhile, Mexico continues to make billions on

    • not only our bad trade deals but
    • also relies heavily on the billions of dollars in remittances sent from illegal immigrants in the United States back to Mexico
      • ($22 billion in 2013 alone).

    In short,

    • the Mexican government has taken the United States to the cleaners.
    • They are responsible for this problem, and
    • they must help pay to clean it up.

    The cost of building a permanent border wall pales mightily in comparison to

    • what American taxpayers spend every single year on
      • dealing with the fallout of illegal immigration
      • on their communities,
      • schools and
      • unemployment offices.

    Mexico must

    • pay for the wall and,
    • until they do,
      • the United States will, among other things:
        • impound all remittance payments derived from illegal wages;
        • increase fees on all temporary visas issued to Mexican
          • CEOs and
          • diplomats
        • (and if necessary cancel them);
        • increase fees on all border crossing cards –
          • of which we issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year
            • (a major source of visa overstays);
        • increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from Mexico
          • (another major source of overstays);
          and
        • increase fees at ports of entry to the United States from Mexico
        • [Tariffs and foreign aid cuts are also options].
    We will not be taken advantage of anymore.

    Defend The Laws And Constitution Of The United States

    America will only be great as long as America remains a nation of laws that lives according to the Constitution. No one is above the law. The following steps will return to the American people the safety of their laws, which politicians have stolen from them:

    • Triple the number of ICE officers.
      • As the President of the ICE Officers’ Council explained in Congressional testimony:
        • “Only approximately 5,000
          • officers and
          • agents
        • within ICE perform the lion’s share of ICE’s immigration mission…
        • Compare that to the Los Angeles Police Department at approximately 10,000 officers.
        • Approximately 5,000 officers in ICE cover
          • 50 states,
          • Puerto Rico and
          • Guam,
          and
        • are attempting to enforce immigration law against 11 million illegal aliens already in the interior of the United States.
        • Since 9-11,
          • the U.S. Border Patrol has tripled in size,
          • while ICE’s immigration enforcement arm,
            • Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO),
          • has remained at relatively the same size.”
      • This will be funded by
        • accepting the recommendation of the Inspector General for Tax Administration and
        • eliminating tax credit payments to illegal immigrants.
    • Nationwide e-verify.
      • This simple measure will protect jobs for unemployed Americans.
    • Mandatory return of all criminal aliens.
      • The Obama Administration has released 76,000 aliens from its custody with criminal convictions since 2013 alone.
      • All criminal aliens must be returned to their home countries,
      • a process which can be aided by
        • canceling any visas to foreign countries which will not accept their own criminals, and
        • making it a separate and additional crime to commit an offense while here illegally.
    • Detention—not catch-and-release.
      • Illegal aliens apprehended crossing the border must be detained until they are sent home,
      • no more catch-and-release.
    • Defund sanctuary cities.
      • Cut-off federal grants to any city which refuses to cooperate with federal law enforcement.
    • Enhanced penalties for overstaying a visa.
      • Millions of people come to the United States on temporary visas but
        • refuse to leave,
        • without consequence.
      • This is a threat to national security.
      • Individuals who refuse to leave at the time their visa expires should be subject to criminal penalties;
      • this will also help give local jurisdictions the power to hold visa overstays until federal authorities arrive.
      • Completion of a visa tracking system – required by law but blocked by lobbyists – will be necessary as well.
    • Cooperate with local gang task forces.
      • ICE officers should accompany local police departments conducting raids of violent street gangs
        • like MS-13 and
        • the 18th street gang,
      • which have terrorized the country.
      • All illegal aliens in gangs should be
        • apprehended and
        • deported.
      • Again, quoting Chris Crane:
        • “ICE Officers and Agents are forced to apply the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Directive,
          • not to children in schools, but
          • to adult inmates in jails.
        • If an illegal-alien inmate simply claims eligibility,
        • ICE is forced to release the alien back into the community.
        • This includes serious criminals
          • who have committed felonies,
          • who have assaulted officers, and
          • who prey on children…
        • ICE officers should be required to place detainers on every illegal alien they encounter in
          • jails and
          • prisons,
        • since these aliens
          • not only violated immigration laws, but
          • then went on to engage in activities that led to their arrest by police;
        • ICE officers should be required to issue Notices to Appear to all illegal aliens with
          • criminal convictions,
          • DUI convictions, or
          • a gang affiliation;
        • ICE should be working with
          • any state or
          • local drug or
          • gang task force
        • that asks for such assistance.”
    • End birthright citizenship.
      • This remains the biggest magnet for illegal immigration.
      • By a 2:1 margin, voters say it’s the wrong policy,
      • including Harry Reid who said “no sane country” would give automatic citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants.

    Put American Workers First

    Decades of disastrous trade deals and immigration policies

    • have destroyed our middle class.
    • Today,
      • nearly 40% of black teenagers are unemployed.
      • Nearly 30% of Hispanic teenagers are unemployed.
    • For black Americans without high school diplomas, the bottom has fallen out:
      • more than 70% were employed in 1960,
      • compared to less than 40% in 2000.
    • Across the economy,
      • the percentage of adults in the labor force has collapsed to a level not experienced in generations.
    • As CBS news wrote in a piece entitled “America’s incredible shrinking middle class”:
      • “If the middle-class is the economic backbone of America, then the country is developing osteoporosis.”

    The influx of foreign workers

    • holds down salaries,
    • keeps unemployment high, and
    • makes it difficult for poor and working class Americans
    • – including immigrants themselves and their children –
    • to earn a middle class wage.
    • Nearly half of all immigrants and
    • their US-born children currently live in or near poverty,
      • including more than 60 percent of Hispanic immigrants.
    • Every year,
      • we voluntarily admit another 2 million
        • new immigrants,
        • guest workers,
        • refugees, and
        • dependents,
      • growing our existing all-time historic record population of 42 million immigrants.
      • We need to control the admission of new low-earning workers in order to:
        • help wages grow,
        • get teenagers back to work,
        • aid minorities’ rise into the middle class,
        • help schools and communities falling behind, and
        • to ensure our immigrant members of the national family become part of the American dream.

    Additionally, we need to

    • stop giving legal immigrant visas to people bent on causing us harm. From
      • the 9/11 hijackers,
      • to the Boston Bombers, and
      • many others,
    • our immigration system is being used to attack us.
    • The President of the immigration caseworkers union declared in a statement on ISIS:
      • “We’ve become the visa clearinghouse for the world.”

    Here are some additional specific policy proposals for long-term reform:

    Increase prevailing wage for H-1Bs.

    • We graduate two times more Americans with STEM degrees each year than find STEM jobs,
    • yet as much as two-thirds of entry-level hiring for IT jobs is accomplished through the H-1B program.
    • More than half of H-1B visas are issued for the program’s lowest allowable wage level, and
    • more than eighty percent for its bottom two.
    • Raising the prevailing wage paid to H-1Bs will force companies to
      • give these coveted entry-level jobs to the existing domestic pool of
        • unemployed native and immigrant workers
      • in the U.S.,
      • instead of flying in cheaper workers from overseas.
    • This will improve the number of
      • black,
      • Hispanic and
      • female workers
    • in Silicon Valley who have been passed over in favor of the H-1B program.
    • Mark Zuckerberg’s personal Senator, Marco Rubio, has a bill to triple H-1Bs that would decimate
      • women and
      • minorities.

    Requirement to hire American workers first.

    • Too many visas,
      • like the H-1B,
    • have no such requirement.
    • In the year 2015,
      • with 92 million Americans outside the workforce and
      • incomes collapsing,
    • we need [the] companies to hire from the domestic pool of unemployed.
    • Petitions for workers should be mailed to the unemployment office, not USCIS.

    End welfare abuse.

    • Applicants for entry to the United States should be required to certify that they can pay for
      • their own housing,
      • healthcare and
      • other needs
    • before coming to the U.S.

    Jobs program for inner city youth.

    • The J-1 visa jobs program for foreign youth
      • will be terminated and
      • replaced with a resume bank for inner city youth provided to all corporate subscribers to the J-1 visa program.

    Refugee program for American children.

    • Increase standards for the admission of
      • refugees and
      • asylum-seekers
    • to crack down on abuses.
    • Use the monies saved on expensive refugee programs to
      • help place American children without parents in safer homes and communities, and
      • to improve community safety in high crime neighborhoods in the United States.

    Immigration moderation.

    • Before any new green cards are issued to foreign workers abroad,
      • there will be a pause where
        • employers will have to hire from the domestic pool of
          • unemployed immigrant and
          • native workers.
      • This will help reverse women’s
        • plummeting workplace participation rate,
        • grow wages, and
        • allow record immigration levels to subside to more moderate historical averages.
  • IMMIGRATION REFORM THAT WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

    08/16/2015 11:07:01 PM PDT · 1 of 23
    WilliamofCarmichael
    I will post the document in a reply below.
  • Obama, Iran deal supporters shouldn’t stifle debate

    08/16/2015 2:18:40 PM PDT · 5 of 14
    WilliamofCarmichael to Brad from Tennessee
    Obama is trying to stifle the debate by attacking the personal motives and public-communication methods of those who oppose the pact.

    mau-mauing.

    meaning.. "to intimidate by hostile confrontation or threats"

    See "Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers" by Tom Wolfe

    Mr. Dershowitz should remember the 1960s and the campus radical, psycho spoiled brats with their mau-mauing.

    The Obama Administration is aging 1960s campus radical, psycho spoiled brats and their ideological litter of which Obama is one. They've been occupying buildings on the Beltway Campus for more than six years.

    Additionally it's the same Cold War bullshti that pro-Soviets in Washington used saying that we had to be nice to the Soviet Union and help them lest we play into the hands of the Soviet hard liners, there will be war, and it will be out fault.