Free Republic

It should spell out the allegory clearly, e.g., Galatians 4 where Paul used the images of the bondswoman/Mt Sinai and the freewoman as allegories of the two covenants; one depicting earthly Jerusalem and other the heavenly Jerusalem. Earthly Jerusalem is in bondage, while “the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all.”

Revelation 2 and 3 have no characteristics of a biblical allegory. The notion that they depict dispensations/ages within a dispensation is pure invention.

There were seven real churches in Asia Minor. This fact alone in no way supports the notion that the churches somehow represent distinct and identifiable dispensations within the so-called church age. That is pure dispensational allegorizing.

What do you suppose the Jews are going to find when they go looking for food?

Nothing, since the church will be gone according to the dispensational theory.

According to the Bible and contra dispensationalism, the Church will be preserved until Christ returns at the Second Coming. It will hold forth the truth of the gospel to all nations until the end.

That’s a bogus interpretation of Revelation 2 and 3. There is nothing in the Bible to support the theory. It’s an example of dispensational allegorizing.

Watch Israel.

What exactly are we watching for? All I suspect is we’ll see her conversion en mass to faith in Jesus Christ prior to His coming.

Christ is the head of the Church. She will prevail because He has been given all authority in heaven and on earth.

Since God’s timetable is not ours, you and I will probably be quite dead before this ever happens. It's already 2000 years and counting.

Many Reformed theologians, like theologians in general, have believed in a future for national Israel. The difference between their biblical outlook and what goes around in dispensationalist/futurist/rapturist circles is considerable.

Dispensationalists believe that the modern state of Israel is prophetically significant in spite of the fact that they exhibit no true faith towards the triune God of the Bible. Dispensationalists believe we are the terminal generation because of what happened 1948 -- a purely political action -- not because any true faith is exhibited in the nation

The Bible, on the other hand, teaches that blessing is predicated on faith, true faith in the God of Abraham, and the Savior of mankind, the Lord Jesus Christ. National repentance will be exhibited in Israel before the return of Christ for His own. That may be in the near future, or, more likely, it may still be many generations away. Of course this is true of all the nations, not just Israel.

Yes.

I didn’t ignore anything. In fact I explicitly dealt with the saints militant. Take off your rapturist glasses and read more carefully.

At Christ Second Coming the souls of the saints who have “fallen asleep” return with Christ to be reunited with their bodies (first), then the saints who are alive are translated body and soul, and both classes of saints are with Christ in their resurrected bodies.

There is no direct indication in the Bible that the “marriage supper” of the Lamb takes place in heaven. While this is asserted in rapturist theology, the fact is it will take place when the Bride is fully prepared, at the Second Coming at the (one and only) resurrection, perhaps in the new heavens and new earth.

I’m certainly catholic (universal), but no longer Roman Catholic (sectarian).

Thus spake JN Darby. But it ain't in the Bible. 

I was Roman Catholic by birth. I'm Reformed by the grace if God, never to return to the pigsty of the papacy. . 

Error did not begin with Camping. Rome is an expert in that regard. 

There is one holy, catholic and apostolic Church, but it ain't hq'ed Rome. 

What they do in practice is more like "literal when convenient." They have no consistent hermeneutics. They can pick and choose when to be "literal" and when to spiritualize.

See The Myth of Consistent Literalism.

Roman Catholic propaganda is as bad as protestant propaganda.

I was converted in the heyday of dispensationalism back in the ‘70s. Fancied myself a true believer until a good friend opened the Bible to reveal the richness of what is embodied in the Reformed faith.

Interesting that is was the process and not the substance that stuck with you. I find that true of many former CC members. Truth is in the Bible, not in men. How we learn to study the Bible is obviously the key.

What you are obviously missing is a biblical view of the Church, and the nature of the saints who have fallen asleep vs. those who are alive at His coming.

There saint triumphant and saints militant.

The saints triumphant (in their souls) return with Christ at the Second Coming to be reunited with their bodies that rise from the grave.

The saints militant are changed in the twinkling of an eye and they meet Christ body and soul in the air. All these transformed/resurrected saints accompany Christ to the earth in triumph where He judges the sheep and goats.

All this proves is that those who don't want to believe in the Rapture will say just about anything, no matter how ridiculous to justify their disbelief...

You just need to read the Bible to get the complete picture. There is a ”rapture” in the Bible, just not the false view of the rapture invented by the JN Darby and perpetuated by the dispensationalists. It’s called the Second Coming.