Probably won't be :-) but I am also sure that if this article were anti-Bush or made him look bad in any ole way, or this were an article that told it like it is right down the middle...pros and cons... there would be the usual NEWSMAX is a tabloid and non-credible, posts. But since it is in favor of the President Newsmax will be glorified, bumped and --suddenly-- held high.
I hear ya and get why Thompson is scape-goating and hiding behind his lawyer but every journalist is due a retraction, Thompson apparently did... so what is the problem in him explaining more he retracted, why does he need a lawyer?
Scientology is not a cure all for dyslexia. They took enough of Tom's money to where Tom compensated his study/reading habits, (anyone can be helped if they are convinced they are helped,) this fool religion took the credit.
I APOLOGIZE, Wholeheartedly, TO YOU, MY BAD, I AM SORRY, WILL YOU FORGIVE ME?
I need a drink now :-) I saw your screen name in other related threads and thought you were 'of CHB', somehow??? I thought you were a spokesperson for CHB.
I AM SORRY, MY BAD
Damn, I got excited and thought someone was gonna splain this crap, already!
Capitol Hill Blue, the oldest daily news site on the Internet, has been sold to a group of working Washington journalists.
Doug Thompson Media, owner and operator of the web site since its debut on the Web on October 1, 1994, announced today that it has agreed to sell the site to Capitol Hill Journalism Partnership.
"Capitol Hill Blue is a pioneer in web-based journalism," said partnership spokesman William J. Lowrey. "We intend to honor that tradition and improve upon it."
The partnership is composed of working, Washington-based journalists who work for print, broadcast and web-based media outlets.
"We intend to use Blue as a test bed for new techniques and concepts for web journalism," Lowrey said.
I think it would be far more "educational" if you perhaps could elucidate on the above selling of CHB statements. WHO OWNS Capitol Hill Blue at the present time? Who was the deceptive party in this fiasco?
And what exactly does this mean?
"We intend to use Blue as a test bed for new techniques and concepts for web journalism," Lowrey said.
Thank-you, for your time in response.I will go read the links you posted to possibly start to answer my questions figuring out this fiasco.
You are way off base by insinuating William is anyone other than who he is.
So instead of insinuating I am drinking (drunk) because I question who is who and what, in this CHB fiasco, post your reasoning/facts for the above statement instead of thanking gawwd you are going to go get your nails done.
I am drinking coffee. Why would I "but' the bottle down? :-)
The way the CHB writers are going anyone can BE William McKinley,Doug Thompson,- for all we know even SOBER, :-) they are Fred Flinstone and Barney Rubble, or Beavis and Butthead, Terry McCauliffe, James Carville,Paul Begala, The Queen of England.
I am sorry, in my confusment, I was being fecetious with "the Who" song, who, who,- who the $%*% are you. Who are you? What exactly do you have to do with Capitol Hill Blue? Doug Thompson?