Free Republic

I stopped going to Walgreens years ago when a pharmacist violated my Hipaa rights by getting real loud about a prescription that my doctor wrote in front of five people standing there. She even had the nerve to actually call my doctor who said it was between patient and physician.
FYI: I had fallen off my roof while blowing leaves out of my gutter and blown out my knee and ankle. I was a mess but no broken bones.

I have been boycotting Walgreens ever since. The problem is that Walgreens pharmacies as a whole makes a crack dealer look like they have morals. They are by far the largest purchasers of pharmaceuticals there is. They can actually control the cost of most drugs.

I had a family member who had a simple ear infection. They priced the ear drops at Walgreens - close to $80. I priced the SAME EXACT drops at Costco - $6. While you wont likely die from an ear infection my entire family thought that an $75 mark up was outrageous. There is nobody in my immediate family who will buy a thing at Walgreens. Yet they just keep popping up. Walgreens does not read their mail, they don’t even have common sense.

Living in Chicagoland there is a VERY exclusive suburb named Lake Forest. The Ex-wife of Walgreens heir Charles R. Walgreen decided she was going to keep pigs on her 3.3 million dollar parcel. This didn’t make for happy neighbors who are pretty affluent. The next door neighbor was a surgeon who had saved for years to live there. They sued with a 300 signature petition and Lake Forest passed an ordinance. The Ex-wife moved because she no longer had Walgreens cash being driven in by the truckload.

My moral is: Boycotting Colberts sponsors wont make one bit of difference. The best way to deal with Colbert is to not watch him. He isn’t funny, it’s the same late night crap over and over. Vote with your cable box if you still have one. Believe me, the big cable companies know what’s being watched and what’s not. Fining him just gives attention to a dying show. The last thing I want to do is give him any attention. Let him fade away into obscurity.

I politely disagree with your actions. The reason why is things have changed in 21 years. 7 years ago in Dupage County IL (which is next to Will County IL) my mother who was 72 years old at the time talked to the Dupage County Sheriffs after a similar crime was committed against her.

Her story is not much different then yours except for the ending. There was knock on her front door in the middle of the day. She looked out the peep hole to see a person with a bandana covering their face. They opened the screen door and took a couple of kicks at the front door. She went for her 686 .357 magnum and then called 911. Looking out the peep hole the guy was standing on her lawn facing the house. With the Sherriff on their way and now armed she opened the front door with the .357 in plain sight. The guy came towards her and she told him to stop or she would shoot as she now had the .357 raised and aimed. He did and laid down on the grass. The Sheriffs deputies showed up in force.

She explained the exact same thing over and over, this guy tried to break into her house. She never said the magic words “She feared for her life.” Which is what an attorney would have said if she had kept her mouth shut. The Sheriff never asked if she was in fear of her life, which she was. She was charged with brandishing a weapon even though on average it takes more then 25 minutes for the DCS to respond to anything. The reason she was charged? Because the guy AFTER taking a couple of kicks at her door was just standing on her lawn and she had called 911. She didn’t want the guy to get away.

They made her out to be a criminal even though this guy tried to break into her house. Remember we are talking about a 72 year old woman alone in her house, minding her own business. The guy was charged with a bunch of stuff and had quite the extensive rap sheet. In a Dupage County Court a judge threw the charge out against my mother immediately and she later testified against the attempted home invader.
End of story?

NO. After jumping through hoops to get her gun back from Dupage County she got a letter from the Illinois State Police. They wanted to talk to her about her FOID card status. A hearing was scheduled, if she didn’t appear her right to own a gun would be taken away because she was charged with a firearm related offense. Never mind that it was immediately thrown out. She hired a attorney and went to the hearing. This was a 1 hour hearing and in the end her FOID card wasn’t revoked.

My point of all of this is if she would have just said “I feared for my life, this masked man tried to break into my house and now I need to exercise my right to speak with an attorney” and stuck to that, she wouldn’t have been charged with brandishing a weapon. She told the truth, she got in trouble with the Sheriffs and the State because she didn’t state that. The assumption is that castle doctrine applies but really the police are not your friends. They are the police. Sometimes common sense isn’t common sense.

The Sheriffs charged her because she went outside, just like you hence in the eyes of the law escalating the situation. Forget that the guy was 3 strike loser who had all sorts of B&Es and a rap sheet pages long. She was supposed to wait for him to actually break into the house. Basically what I’m saying is maybe it flies in Will County 21 years ago but it didn’t fly in Dupage County 7 years ago.

BTW she now lives in Will County in Naperville, she has a .40 cal w/ a laser and a large German Shepherd. She will be 80 later this year and if the ISP revoked her FOID card she was moving to Indiana. After her dealings with the ISP she wanted to sue Dupage County six ways to Sunday but after cooling off she moved to Naperville. It had to be somewhere where they had a PD and not Sheriffs.