Free Republic

Hi Hot Tabasco! Not being a dork, but BOTH Richard Barnett’s from Arkansas with the same age of 59ish 60ish are registered as the Optional Party. Basically, not affiliated. I would humbly argue then he is NOT a GOPer, just another Democrat plant.

- Miss Scarlet: “A plant? I thought men like you were usually called a fruit.”

https://voterrecords.com/voter/68863520/richard-barnett

https://voterrecords.com/voter/69045469/richard-barnett

I showed up today just to add my contempt for the Marxist RINO Romney who I did NOT vote for in 2012. As well, it was a distinct pleasure to watch Karl Rove meltdown on live TV when Romney lost. It will be equally satisfying to watch Trump, who is our greatest president ever, win again in Nov, and to watch Romney get thrown out of the Senate in 2024. Once a RINO, ALWAYS A BACKSTABBING RINO!

You can confirm my older posts that I oppose the majority of the Senator’s positions and behavior. I started a certain website because of him. However, I ask my God to forgive the man, and to spare his life.

In Daniel, the prophecy of the 70 weeks is not stated as a complete whole but rather as two separate times within one over arching era. It says the 69 weeks, and then discusses the 70th week as two separate events. It is really subtle, so I always ask people to look slowly and closely. That 70th week corresponds to what the book of Revelation, written sometime in the 90’s, describes as the 7 year Tribulation. Suetonius describes in graphic detail the persecution of the Jews under the Emperor Domitian, the increased aggravation of the Jewish Tax due to a desire to pay for a cash poor Domitian who had run away building programs which resulted in one occasion of an elderly man being stripped naked to examine him for circumcision, all this carried out in front of Suetonius himself. This persecution corresponds to the persecution alluded to by Clement of Rome in his first epistle.

All that to come to this head, the division between the 69th and 70th week is an indeterminate time, spoken by Jesus as the time of the Gentiles in Luke. The book of Revelation makes clear that the 1,000 years of the revival of the Jewish nation as the center of the rule of God on Earth will begin at the end of the 7 years of Tribulation. At the end of 7 years, when Jerusalem is surrounded by the hordes of evil, Jesus, the Messiah, will sweep in with His armies, to rescue His people, and establish His rule on this Earth. Maranatha!

I pray that I have spoken without rancor. May I ask something, that before you do anything else, that you take one moment to pray to God and ask Him to help you know what does He want you to believe. I believe that God hears the prayer of those who want to know Him, I believe that God is the God of Truth and wants all mankind to come to believe in Him, and finally, I believe He rewards the person who humbles himself and asks for God’s help.

May you find the Messiah! Shalom!

Im going to have to post the Never Trumpers as their own list on the RINOList.org! This whole thread is so full of win!

If you read until the end, I cite the specific post by Max Lucado that I am referring to. I apologize for the lack of clarity.

Sarcasm is the spice of the passionate soul.

But those evils pale in comparison to what I now see. I see decent elected officials, decent writers, decent pastors, and decent personalities point the canons of their pens at one indecent man. One man who did none of the above. One man who did not sell baby parts nor pay for them nor force us to pay for them. One man whose primary crime is not that he is indecent, not that he is immoral, not that he is a braggart. No, his crime is that he is these things in public.

He does not hide in the cloak rooms of power presiding over his retinue of pages and interns as kings of old ruled over their harems. He does not seek out every moment of public light to show his vaunted righteousness to the religious masses only to return to his foam parties and well heeled dinner parties.

Donald Trump is Donald Trump. What you see is what you get. At least, we hope it is. Perhaps he is a new American Caesar. I do not fear a single despot, for in this land still flows the blood that cries, “Death to tyrants!” “Long live the revolution!” I fear what Hobbes called the Leviathan. Orwell called it Oceania. The Wachowski Brothers called it the Matrix. And the Bible calls it the Beast. What I fear is a government industrial machine that is dedicated to wiping out all freedom.

My problem is not with the Donald, my problem is not even with the armies of Republicans who live and breath in DC and on K Street, and who are now in danger of losing their magazine cover houses and apartments. I have no problem with them attempting to maintain their position in the face of the overwhelming flood that is Donald Trump. My message to them is that he is only a forerunner of things to come.

My problem is with the high minded pastors and personalities who believe that it is their mission to savage their fellow citizens for the crime of putting off the battered wife syndrome. These pastors and personalities are no longer guides leading us into righteousness, they have become the thug carrying along his cudgel collecting the protection money for the boss, and angry now that the shopkeeper finally has the gall to say no. It just so happens that the shopkeeper has found a bigger bully to help him out. It might be that someday the bully will turn into another boss himself. If so, at least the current regime will end.

Answer these questions to see if I am right. Where was the outrage by those same decent pastors and personalities at the indecent murder of innocents? Where was the same vitriol at the indecent war in Syria and the funding of Moderate Muslim terrorists by the decent John McCain and the decent Lindsey Graham? Where were the cries of “bad form” against the raising of the debt into astronomical measure? And where was the rending of the clothes at the continued funding of the American Nazi chop shops? So ask yourself why now? Why are we to be angry at Trump? Simply because he has the indecency to stop the flow of money to Washingtonians who are the ones screaming now “bad form” at the possible loss of their cushy jobs. If the Donald makes good on his promises, those same Washingtonians would have to return to the private sector where their real enemy lies, us, the American people.

I would like to sum up my feelings on Max Lucado's charge of indecency to the Donald. Mr. Lucado, to hell with your decency.

Does not surprise me! The fix is in, folks. Welcome to the future 2016 Grudge Match! Bush vs. Clinton, or if the Clinton War Machine cannot overcome the heat, it will be Bush vs. Gore Grudge Match.

The Two ZoNation Videos mentioned in the post

https://www.youtube.com/embed/V01XrT03jW4

https://www.youtube.com/embed/wHw_PKkzm4k

Video of Colin Powell talking about Selma and the Dark Vein of Intolerance

https://www.youtube.com/embed/S6k6oz41HGI

Third, it was racist because "Hands up, Dont shoot, was a mantra built upon a lie." Michael Brown was shot because he did attempt to assault the police after he had strong armed robbed a cigar shop. Michael Brown did not have his hands up, that was also a lie. These lies led to a mob mentality that destroyed a city, engulfed a nation, and showed the world that the Black community in Ferguson is gullible to be led to burn itself down by the White Racist Cop stereotype. Instead of calming racial tensions, General, you are further inflaming them, just like the President you voted in.

 

But we are told all the time that we need RINOs like these to win back the White House. No we do not. If we are going to be forced by our barista to have a discussion about race, then lets talk about how much better the US is than any European country about race, about the systemic racism of the Latino community against Blacks, and about the duplicitous leaders of the Black community who have led their people in poverty and dehumanized them by their Marxist philosophies instead of the Western Tradition of hard work, law abiding citizenry, sex inside of marriage, and contributing to the public welfare. Or just tell the barista to hand you your Large (not Grande) coffee and keep their social engineering projects to themselves.

End racism by getting an education, getting a job, staying out of crime, getting married before having sex, contributing your individual talents to the community, and defending everyone else's right to do the same regardless of their educational, family, religious, or cultural backgrounds!

Furthermore, how about we talk about the insane levels of racism on the Left, whom love the cahartic Starbucks campaign so they can buy their coffee, atone for their sins, and get to work on time.

How about the sad case of this amazing young, black man who did the unpardonable sin of leaving the Liberal Democrat plantation, and living the Free life as a Conservative Republican.

 

Now for the funny. Here are some wonderful replies to the absolutely ignorant attempt at social engineering by the entitled Elite of Starbucks.

https://twitter.com/Paladin114/status/578308397210062848

 

https://twitter.com/exjon/status/578307649302712321

https://twitter.com/back_ttys/status/578307900810129408

See more of the hilarity at Twtichy.com

Doug, we part ways on this one issue: a Conservative CAN win! You are SO wrong about this. A true, actual Conservative that believes like us CAN absolutely win the nomination and the General Election. This country is NOT Leftist. You and I are being manipulated, scammed, and sabotaged. Our candidates were getting bush wacked in 2008-2010 and that is why I started my unsuccessful little blog, http://www.rinolist.org , in order to give some push back (there I go with the blog pimping again. So ZOT me! Ive been to the other side and back once! Im joking for effect people, please dont ZOT)

My point is, my dear brother in arms, is that the whole concept of HAVING to vote for these guys is completely absurd, because we DONT have to accept poison or shotgun to the face. We can have what we want, but its going to take some pain. We have to start looking out for our people by doing what they do to ours, shoot them before they get out of the gate.

Jeb is definitely going up on the list, as soon as I get some time. And like I told someone else who asked why Christie was not yet on the RINO List, “You have to be a Republican to be a Republican in Name Only.”

And should be, “DID IQs just drop sharply while I was away?”

Should say, “the pointing out of the hijacking is a legitimate way of demonstrating...”

Sorry, but you have me passionate. I guess that is what we all should be, just with better spell checkers and proofreading skills.

First, I am one of very few who can say have been ZOTed and UnZOTed! Its kinda like being dead then undead, but whatever. Im not asking for ZOTing to happen, but pointing out the hijacking is legitimate, because it goes to show the vitriol NOT of those rabid, purist Conservatives, but of the nastiness of the Romney-bots who thought they were going to get several extra wives too.

Second, the winning strategy is to make the Star Chamber/Bilderberg Group/NWO who the heck ever is in charge of the power in the GOP that we only want a Republican that will obey the Constitution and perform the Party Platform as it is written in our conventions each election cycle. By consistently saying NO to Liberal RINOs, they will have to make a choice to leave the party, kill the party, or give us what we want. Wait one minute! That sounds almost exactly and entirely like Representation in a Democratic Republic! You mean to tell me that the Conservative, anti-RINO philosophy is actually just what our Founders intended and that they NEVER intended someone to vote for the lessor of two evils? You mean that Conservatives are NOT myopically obsessed with winning only one election and then hoping for the best? You mean to tell me we put in a mixed group of Republicans in Congress and absolutely no one as the balls to stand up to the President when they hold one freaking third of the Govt?

What has happened to Free REPUBLIC?

“Have IQs just drop sharply while I was away?” - Sigourney Weaver as Ellen Ripley, Aliens

I can assure you, even with RINOs in office, the Libs would not allow the oncoming Zombie Apocalypse to be forestalled, but I completely agree on all other counts. Here is the theory behind why I took a decidedly and intellectually negative slant during the fertile early days of the Tea Party. Liberal Republicans have been the consistent problem with the consistent application of the Republican Party Platform. Not mind you, Right Wing polices, but simply the Party Platform! We have had a divided Party for DECADES! If the Tea Party was ever going to be successful, it was going to take some extremely consistent negative push back against what has now become known as the Establishment. We were NOT going to get that at the early days of 2008-2010 with Beck, Rush, and Levin willing to be accommadating to Congressional Republicans who did not walk the walk. It was a time when people on our side wanted a win at the ballot box not a win in legislation. THIS IS WHAT WE GET! Those decisions BACK THEN are what is killing us now! That is why I scream to the roof tops that beating every RINO in ANY election, Primary or General, should be at the top of the list, whatever the short term cost, because the long term viability of the Republic is at stake.

To be completely honest, my gut feeling is that we have turned down a road that there is no coming back from. I fear for my nation, for my people, and for the world. As a fellow commentator said earlier on this thread, things are looking more and more Biblical by the day.

Whatever happens, seek God for your spiritual salvation, He can ONLY be found in the Bible (specifically read the Gospel of John and Romans), love your neighbours as deeply as possible, keep your powder dry, and when the day comes to write the next chapter in the American Revolution, shoot straight and die well.

First, all the thread hijackers need to stand down. Using a thread about the recent gun control of our liege as an attempt to smear Conservatives is something for the Huffington Post comment section, NOT Free Republic.

Second, the President CANNOT decide which parts of the 2nd Amendment he likes or dislikes or interprets to like or dislike. It is Congress’ authority granted them by the Constitution to reign in the President through legislative action or by impeachment. GO call Boehner and tell him to keep on fighting using every legal means he has, like of course how he has been doing since he took control in 2011, right? Oh wait, thats right, one of the first acts as Speaker he did was go golfing with the liege, like a good RINO does. He has been milktoast like rest of the gang, who “we have to vote for or else the Libs are in charge.”

Third, ANYTIME you place a RINO in nomination, expect to lose to the Democrat. That would make a smart guy think, “Ya know, those Conservatives really mean what they say, and wont accept our junk RINO candidates. Guess we better not vote for them in the primaries and that we better scream to high Heaven against them, or else the Democrats will win.” That is exactly the point with the McCain loss and the Romney loss, STOP PUTTING THOSE %$&#@* UP FOR NOMINATION!

Those are your answers! Now get busy, since we are on the same side, right, Romney-bots?

The problem is that SO many dont want to hear it!

Since I am the RINO List dude, some here call a blog pimp, I would like to take the responsibility for defeating Mitt “RINO” Romney. I would also like to remind some of the Romney-Bots that first the whole lesser of two evils argument is a negative argument for someone. That right there kills it for you off the bat. If your best argument is that he is less bad than the alternative, you kind of have already lost the argument, which is why you DID lose the argument and the election.

Romney never was nor is a Capitalist. He was and is a Merchantilist. He was and is an East Coast Liberal. He was on the Main Street Republican board along with Juan McCain and Lindsey Grahmnesty which accepted money from George “Dr. Evil” Soros. The way we know it was the old wrinkly evil guy was because Michelle Malkin discovered and published the info years ago.

Now, about da guns. If you apes think that RINO Romney would have protected the guns from gun grabbers, please explain these things from the Mittster!

From the Washington Post:

“Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney has actually been more active than Obama on gun control — albeit during his time in Massachusetts. Since leaving office, he has moved away from those positions.

While running for Senate in Massachusetts in 1994, Romney supported background checks and a ban on some assault weapons. “That’s not going to make me the hero of the NRA,” he said. Running for governor in 2002, he said, “We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts — I support them. I won’t chip away at them. I believe they help protect us, and provide for our safety.”

As governor, in 2004, signed an assault-weapons ban in the state. However, that law won support from some gun-rights advocates by making it easier to get and renew a firearms license. Romney also raised the state’s gun-registration fee from $25 to $75.

Romney joined the National Rifle Association in 2006, a few months before launching his first presidential bid. “I’m a member of the NRA and believe firmly in the right to bear arms,” he said in 2007.

Pressed by NBC’s Tim Russert on the issue that year, he said, “I support Second Amendment rights, but I don’t line up 100 percent with the NRA. They take some positions that are different than mine.” He continued to support the assault-weapons ban, reaffirming that position in a 2008 debate.

However, in a subsequent interview with conservative bloggers, Romney said, “I don’t support any gun control legislation, the effort for a new assault weapons ban, with a ban on semi-automatic weapons, is something I would oppose. There’s no new legislation that I’m aware of or have heard of that I would support.” “

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/where-obama-and-romney-stand-on-gun-control/2012/07/20/gJQAwMpNyW_blog.html

For a snort worthy display of his “positions” see http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt_Romney_Gun_Control.htm

How about this:

“I’m after the NRA’s endorsement,” Romney told an audience in Derry, N.H. “I’m not sure they’ll give it to me. I hope they will.”

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/07/25/romney-s-flip-flops-on-gun-control-over-the-years.html

These guys here were WAY too nice to the Mittster mostly because they omit a TON of evidence that the above sites do give. But even then they give him a half flip.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/may/18/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-exhibits-marked-change-gun-rhetoric/

This video will make you laugh or snort depending.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/23/mitt-romney-gun-control_n_1696538.html

And finally this from the Gun Owners of America BEFORE the election.

http://gunowners.org/mittromney-2012.htm

PLEASE stop the lies that RINOmney would have been this champion of Conservatism and a defender of our guns. By this time, he would be “mulling over” what to do to enforce greater gun control.