Posted on 09/27/2016 7:23:35 AM PDT by Salvation
We are beginning to read from the Book of Job in daily Mass. One of its core issues is the problem of suffering and why God allows it. If God is omnipotent and omniscient then how can He tolerate evil, injustice, and suffering of the innocent? Where is God when a woman is raped, when genocide is committed, or when evil men hatch their plots? Why did God even conceive the evil ones and let them be born?
The problem of evil cannot be answered simply; it is a mystery. Its purpose and why God permits it are caught up in our limited vision and understanding. Scripture says that all things work together for the good of those who love and trust the Lord and are called according to his purposes (Rom 8:28). But how this is often difficult for us to see. Anyone who has ever suffered a tragic and senseless loss or has observed the disproportionate suffering that some must endure cannot help but ask why. And the answers arent all that satisfying to many.
As in the days of Job, we cry out for answers but few are forthcoming. In the Book of Job, God speaks from a whirlwind, questioning Jobs ability to even ask the right questions. In the end, though, He is God and we are not. This must be enough for us and we must look with trust to the reward that awaits the faithful.
One of the most perplexing aspects of suffering is its uneven distribution. In America as a whole, there is much less suffering than in many other parts of the world. And even here, some go through life strong, wealthy, and well-fed while others suffer crippling disease, sudden losses, financial setbacks, and burdens. And while a lot of our suffering comes from our own poor choices and/or lack of self-control, some of it seems unrelated. The most difficult suffering to accept is that inflicted on the innocent by third parties who seem to suffer no ill effects: parents who mistreat or neglect their children, those who exploit the poor or unsuspecting for their own gain exploited, etc.
Suffering is hard to explain simply or to merely accept. I think this just has to be admitted. Simple slogans and quick answers are seldom sufficient in the face of great evil and suffering. When interacting with those who are deeply disturbed by the problem of evil, a healthy dose of sympathy, understanding, and a call to humility will be more fruitful than forceful rebuttal.
A respectful exposition of the Christian understanding of evil might include some of the following points. (Note that these are not explanations per se (for suffering is a great mystery) and they are humble for they admit of their own limits.)
Im sure you can add to these points. Be careful with the problem of evil and suffering; there are mysterious dimensions that must be respected. The best approach in talking to others may be with an exposition that shows forth the Christian struggle to come to grips with it. The answer of Scripture requires faith, but the answer appeals to reason. Justice calls us to humility before a great mystery of which we can see only a little. The appeal to humility in the face of a mystery may command greater respect from an atheist than would pat answers, which could alienate them.
Monsignor Pope Ping!
Many Christians try to understand this. I have faith that we are not God, which is why it is difficult to understand.
When I saw the title, “Job and Suffering”, i thought someone was writing about having a job that really challenges the individual to keep their cool among a sea of stupidity.
I would suggest for those who might have thought as I did, the title have added “Mr.”. That way, there would be no confusion about exactly whom the author was writing.
(I believe the poor man has earned the title “Mr.”, and all the respect that is due him, as is the same respect due “Father Abraham”.)
Bttt
Excellent observation.
“The problem of evil cannot be answered... .”
.
We are always taught that sin is the reason for our suffering, which is hard to accept. We think that Christ took care of that by His Suffering, but apparently we too must accept our share of misery. There is no answer to the question why the innocent should suffer. Let me know if you have the answer.
Oops!
Thought this was about work.
Getting back to it...
Suffering is where we are defined, where our true selves are revealed. Having said that, you never welcome it but it helps to understand the purpose of suffering.
Regarding the trees:
Gen 2:9 The LORD God made all sorts of trees grow up from the groundtrees that were beautiful and that produced delicious fruit. In the middle of the garden He placed the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
I have always noted they are both in the middle of the garden. In fact I will be so bold and say they were/are right next to each other. You have to walk by one to get to the other.
Why both in the middle? Wouldn’t you give the creatures a sporting chance and put one at the edge? Skew the results a little?
For me the two trees are at the crux of every decision we make, they didn’t go away. Will we choose God and eternal life or the other tree where we decide what is right and wrong. They are that close together..................
Yes, that too.
I agree it is hard to understand. When I am confronted by this question from others—why would a loving God permit evil?—my response is to ask the person to imagine he or she were omniscient and omnipotent. How would the person go about eliminating evil in the world? At what point would you stop evil from happening? Would you encase everyone in some protective shell? Maybe, instead, would you encase bad people in some shell? Would you stop it at the moment of impact from words or actions? Would you prevent people from being able to follow through with evil intent? Or would you do something to keep people from even conceiving evil in the first place?
In each case, consequences follow. If you would prevent evil at impact, there is still the knowledge of evil intent even if it did not come to fruition. If you would encase people in protective bubbles, would you have a people who chose to love God in spite of circumstances? If you stopped people from conceiving evil in the first place, have you not destroyed man’s free will? And if you posit destroying evil influence from satanic forces, do you truly prove a person’s love for God to God or the person himself?
Evil is omnipresent in the world but Christ has promised to turn all suffering into joy eventually. Do we trust Him enough to not condemn evil? We can resist it, avoid it, but not condemn God for allowing it to exist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.