Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DesertRhino

And metaphor — that is very much in line with an “ordinary human language” means of interpreting it.

This is a love book... this is not a science book... imagine trying to take apart “Roses are red, violets are blue” with a biology textbook... misses the point entirely.


41 posted on 02/24/2015 4:48:49 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

That’s a fine example. Agreed.


58 posted on 02/24/2015 5:02:24 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck; RaceBannon
This is a love book... this is not a science book... imagine trying to take apart “Roses are red, violets are blue” with a biology textbook... misses the point entirely.

Though I agree that the Bible isn't a "science" book, whenever it touches on things of a scientific nature, it IS accurate. There are numerous science-related statements in Scripture that people did not even know back then and which have only been discovered recently. Things such as stars all being different than each other, stars as numberless as the sands of the sea, a spherical earth suspended in space, atmospheric circulation, bio-genesis, recirculation of water, etc. (for others, see Science and the Bible.

92 posted on 02/24/2015 7:55:30 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson