Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Look at the “Actual Mass” of Vatican II: the 1965 Missal
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 01-28-15 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 01/29/2015 7:46:27 AM PST by Salvation

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
An interesting review.
1 posted on 01/29/2015 7:46:27 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; ArrogantBustard; Catholicguy; RobbyS; marshmallow; ...

Monsignor Pope Ping!


2 posted on 01/29/2015 7:47:13 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I remember!


3 posted on 01/29/2015 7:51:03 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
. . . the liturgists were at it again, ending with all sorts of additional changes.

"A liturgist is a affliction sent by God so that, in times of no overt persecution, a Catholic need not be denied the privilege of suffering for the Faith."

4 posted on 01/29/2015 8:00:00 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Thank you. Good article.

I simply have no recollection of there ever being singing at Mass until the 70s when the guitars came out. No singing ever of responses. That came in the 70s, too. We simply spoke the words. And we didn’t have a choir either. In the 70s, they started introducing Protestant songs! Pretty, yes, but wrongheaded.


5 posted on 01/29/2015 8:00:04 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: Loyalty Binds Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; BunnySlippers

I remember the 1965 mass, too. It was fine, in my opinion; I missed the Last Gospel, but otherwise, most of the changes weren’t enormous, except that much of it was now in English and one could hear the beautiful prayers. But a lot was kept in Latin, too, although most of that also was audible. Priests had actually been trained in Latin in those days, so many of them could say the prayers nicely and intelligibly in Latin. I thought it was an improvement to be able to hear it and understand it (since the low mass prior to that time was often done in nearly complete silence and you had to figure out where the priest was and read along in your missal).

If they’d kept the 1965 Missal, we would never have had some of the horrors that have been inflicted on us since then.


6 posted on 01/29/2015 8:00:33 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Sadly it would seem many American priests in the 1960s had their own ideas and filled the mass with thumping guitars, hootenanny hymns and blue jeans instead of vestments. I was pleasantly surprised when I was in France in the early 1970s that the mass was still largely in Latin, the hymns sung in French were dignified and not a guitar was in sight. However at the Abbey of Solesmes, a Benedictine monastery near Sable, France, I experienced the Gregorian chant in all its glory.


7 posted on 01/29/2015 8:01:58 AM PST by The Great RJ (Pants up...Don't loot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

So do I.


8 posted on 01/29/2015 8:34:08 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: livius

Actually the new translation is so close to the 1965 Mass when it is translated.

I was attending a workshop on the new translation and a friend had an old 1965 Missal with the English on one side and the Latin on the other. The English was practically identical to the new translations! What a pleasant surprise.


9 posted on 01/29/2015 8:37:03 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
Don't remember the 60’s, but we never really had any priests in the 70’s- or 80’s who allowed things to get out of hand. The only thing I really like that is not always done is the bells. But I hear them in my head so i guess it matters not.
10 posted on 01/29/2015 8:54:41 AM PST by defconw (If not now, WHEN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

The 1965 missal was VASTLY superior to the 1970.


11 posted on 01/29/2015 9:02:51 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
In the 70s, they started introducing Protestant songs! Pretty, yes, but wrongheaded.

What constitutes a "Protestant song"?

12 posted on 01/29/2015 9:09:58 AM PST by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Lacking in substance, for one thing.


13 posted on 01/29/2015 9:21:38 AM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd ("We are condemned by men who are themselves condemned" -- The Most Reverend Marcel Lefebvre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

beginning with a false premise - that changes were well under way - when truth is there was ONE change under Pope Pius XII and that was a revision to the liturgy of Holy Week.

then, leaping to another false premise - that it was the 1970 missal that was to blame for all the abuses. By 1970, the traditional Latin form had been outlawed by most bishops.

finally, the inevitable conclusion - that was not the issue to fight on. It is the next one where will stand our ground. Sound familiar?


14 posted on 01/29/2015 9:28:16 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maryz

Andrew Greeley, from an article in America Magazine from 1990: “True liturgical reform will only occur when the last guitar is smashed over the head of the last liturgist.”


15 posted on 01/29/2015 9:39:21 AM PST by Remole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
I've attended Mass in Paris in the early 2000s. Same thing. The French do it right. Not only that but one of the parishioners got up from the pew to hand me a missal. And they say the French are rude!
16 posted on 01/29/2015 10:06:34 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: Loyalty Binds Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

Over 30 comments at the site. Many worth reading.


17 posted on 01/29/2015 10:06:39 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

LOL.


18 posted on 01/29/2015 10:07:40 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: Loyalty Binds Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
the liturgists were at it again, ending with all sorts of additional changes.

What's the difference between a liturgist and a terrorist? You can negotiate with a terrorist.

19 posted on 01/29/2015 10:38:12 AM PST by JoeFromSidney (Book RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY, available from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
What constitutes a "Protestant song"?

One writen by Martin Luther, or John Calvin. They didn't used to be allowed. They were the only things I missed after I converted in 1958. When we first started having hymns in the Catholic church (Low Mass) they seemed unsingable to my ear. Whole orders of priests, monks, and nuns wrote "new" hymns after 1965. We are still singing them today, and they seem to have relaxed the rule against "Protestant" songs.

However, at Newman Club at the University of CA, Berkeley, the priests used the "Congregational High Mass". It was sung all in Latin and sounded like Gregorian chant to me. I loved that. The space where they said Mass was upstairs. If you were a little bit late and they had started before you cimbed the stairs, the music afting down the stairs was simply heavenly.

I never found another church, after I married, that used that Mass, and I really missed it.

20 posted on 01/29/2015 11:10:45 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson