Posted on 07/19/2014 7:36:47 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
Cardinal Sean O’Malley appeared with liberal Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick on Friday to voice support for Patrick’s proposal to house illegal immigrants and offer Catholic social service assistance for illegals, while the Cardinal said nothing all week about a heinous law advancing in the Mass legislature to penalize those who try to prevent women from aborting their children. In our opinion, the Cardinal is yet more clearly showing his stripes as being a tool of the liberal Democratic pro-abortion establishment, and a hypocrite when it comes to protection of life.
On June 27, Cardinal O’Malley came out in support of the Supreme Court decision that unanimously struck down the previous Massachusetts abortion clinic buffer zone law as unconstitutional. Never had Cardinal O’Malley been seen praying in front of an abortion clinic, but still, his statement was welcome and appreciated when he said that pro-life Americans who “peacefully pray for and offer alternatives to pregnant women approaching abortion clinics” have the same constitutional protections as anyone else “This discriminatory law barred these citizens from gathering on nearby public sidewalks, while exempting ‘clinic escorts’ trained to expedite women into (abortion clinics),” he said. “Clearly this was an attack on pro-life Americans’ freedom of speech, and we welcome the Court’s decision to overturn the law.”
That was June 27. Then this week, the Mass Legislature introduced legislation that is far worse for pro-lifers than the previous law struck down by the Supreme Court. Details of the legislation are posted here by MassResistance:
Creates a new “buffer zone.” The bill creates a 25-foot buffer zone substantially similar to the one which the US Supreme Court recently struck down. Has a “Dispersal” clause. The bill allows police to define any two or more people standing near an abortion clinic as a “gathering.” Any law enforcement official may arbitrarily decide that this “gathering” is in some way impeding access, and may order them to “disperse” and to stay outside of the buffer zone for at least eight hours. This can be done with no legal hearing or due process, threatening them withunusually severe penalties of arrest, prosecution, criminal fines, and jail time for not complying. In addition, a court can later impose civil fines, large punitive damages, attorney’s fees and “expert witness fees”. [First time who "impede a person's access to or departure from a reproductive health care facility with the intent to interfere with that person's ability to provide, support the provision of or obtain services at the reproductive health care facility" face a fine of $1,000 or six months in jail] Harsher punishments for one group over another. The bill places unusually high punishments for anyone threatening, intimidating, assaulting, blocking, or otherwise impeding people entering or leaving abortion clinics. But these high punishments do not apply to people entering or leaving the clinics (or anyone else) who are perpetrators of assaults of intimidation against pro-life advocates. A hearing was held on Wednesday, and the measure quickly passed the Mass Senate. What did Cardinal O’Malley say or do about this publicly? Nothing. On short notice, Mass Citizens for Life had erected billboards and asked people to call legislators and to attend and speak at the hearing. Other organizations including FRC and MassResistance rallied pro-lifers. What did O’Malley, the Mass Catholic Conference and Massachusetts bishops do? Nothing. Nada. Zero. Zip. The last legislative alert sent out by the do-nothing MCC was six months ago. It is truly pathetic. It is clear that the Cardinal’s rhetoric of June 27 was empty, and Cardinal O’Malley simply does not care about this issue–or whether pro-lifers wanting to help prevent women from taking the lives of their unborn children are fine, arrested or jailed.
Instead, O’Malley cares more about the photo opp and chance to get federal or state funding to have Catholic Charities help with housing illegal immigrants. He also basically lied at the Friday press conference about the reasons for the illegal immigration border crisis.
Here’s the photo and Boston Herald article. Cardinal O’Malley said the Catholic church has long assisted “immigrants and refugees often fleeing from danger.” “We are willing to enter a collaborative relationship with the government to met this urgent need,” O’Malley said. “We do not have church facilities that are appropriate but we do have social service agencies in the Archdiocese with skilled resources to provide programs of assistance and support within a framework of a larger state and federal program.”
Cardinal O’Malley, please don’t lie to us. A new intelligence assessment concludes that misperceptions about U.S. immigration policy – and not Central American violence – are fueling the surge of thousands of children illegally crossing the Mexican border. Here are more details:
The 10-page July 7 report was issued by the El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC), which according to the Justice Department website is led by the DEA and incorporates Homeland Security. Its focus is on the collection and distribution of tactical intelligence, information which can immediately be acted on by law enforcement.
“Of the 230 migrants interviewed, 219 cited the primary reason for migrating to the United States was the perception of U.S. immigration laws granting free passes or permisos to UAC (unaccompanied children) and adult females OTMs (other than Mexicans) traveling with minors,” the report said.
Cardinal O’Malley took the time to appear with Gov. Deval Patrick to voice support for housing illegals in Massachusetts in the same week where he did not take even a moment to voice opposition to the heinous bill moving swiftly through the Mass Legislature that will penalize pro-lifers for the “crime” of trying to prevent women from aborting their babies. The Boston Pilot had an article about the situation on Friday, but there was no quote or statement from O’Malley.
We hope and pray he changes his mind over the weekend and mobilizes the Catholic bishops, Mass Catholic Conference and laity to contact House Reps and the Governor and try to still stop this evil measure from passing.
I fear not any of his residual Irish, I am Magyar and the blood of Attila runs in my veins. : )
I thought the blood of Attila ran through the veins of about 17% of the population. A.T.H. got around, and he didn’t often take no for an answer.
What is he…………….a St Louis Cardinal?
And to think both O’Malley and Cardinal Maradiaga are in Francis’ Gang o’ Eight.
Unfortunately, the retirement age is 75.
Gang o' Socialists
And immigration is how Rome has mainly gained and maintained her numbers.
A Catholic in Mexico immigrates to the U.S. and that somehow increases the number of Catholics in the world? That must be some of that Common Core math coming out because I just don't see it.
Well, well, well.....
All those Catholics who I worked with who voted for democrats because they were *for the poor* in spite of the abortion issue have company at the higher levels of the Catholic church.
Looks like my anecdotal evidence wasn’t so untenable after all, even though I was basically accused of lying about it.
Is this guy Catholic?
Can’t the Vatican fire this idiot?
Do Catholics not read or is it comprehension that causes problems? Did you not see the and maintained in that quote?
Oh come now. You know this is just an “off the reservation” guy who has been mistranslated and the MSM has made up stuff and besides, the Church doesn’t change or make mistakes even if the Bishops do.
Context. In the US of course.
You didn’t say the “U.S.” You said “Rome”.
Context.
I’m not Catholic, but I remember Cardinal O’Malley as being seriously considered for Pope when Francis was chosen last time.
You didn’t say the “U.S.” You said “Rome”. Context.
What is wrong here? Do you really think i was referring to the city of Rome, or Roman Catholicism in the US?
Do Catholics not read or is it comprehension that causes problems? Did you not see the and maintained in that quote?
And how exactly does a Catholic moving somewhere "maintain" the number of global Catholics? If you move from one state to another does that impact the total number of Protestants, or whatever, that there are in the world? It doesn't change it, or maintain it. It does nothing but put one of a number in a different place.
What? Are we in kindergarten here?
That depends on who's asking.
If somebody actually thinks that people moving from one place to another is a way for a church to have “gained or maintained” it’s numbers then, yes, I would say we are dealing with kindergarten level thinking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.