This was the text from Persevero's post #38 WRT the Bible and Trent:
The Council of Trent (1545-1564) placed the Bible on its list of prohibited books, and forbade any person to read the Bible without a license from a Roman Catholic bishop or inquisitor. The Council added these words: That if any one shall dare to read or keep in his possession that book, without such a license, he shall not receive absolution till he has given it up to his ordinary.
As Iscool as well as BlueDragon have shown, that EXACT phrase came from a document called "TEN RULES CONCERNING PROHIBITED BOOKS DRAWN UP BY THE FATHERS CHOSEN BY THE COUNCIL OF TRENT AND APPROVED BY POPE PIUS". In the link from Fordham University, The Jesuit University of New York http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/trent-booksrules.asp, the phrase is found at rule IV and the rule reads:
I don't think quibbling over a slight translation difference from what Persevero said and the rule should matter since it IS saying the same thing and it IS speaking about the translations of the Bible (Sacred Books) as well as other writings of those deemed "heretics". In Rule V, we read concerning the Bible:
The final paragraph of this document leaves no room for doubt as to what they were trying to do. It ends with:
It is no wonder people got the impression reading the Bible was a no-no.
As to this document and its connection to Trent, you simply need to go to the documents of the Council of Trent to read that there WERE "fathers" specifically chosen by the Council to develop such a list. In fact, that directive can be found under the Eighteenth Session http://history.hanover.edu/texts/trent/ct18.html:
This should be adequate, more than adequate really, to show that the initial statement was NOT a lie, was NOT an anti-Catholic phony, false, made-up quote falsely ascribed to Trent and that you owe a few people apologies for accusing them of such. I won't hold my breathe, though.
Thank you boatbums, very helpful.
I was pretty sure I wasn’t crazy. . .
You wrote:
“This should be adequate, more than adequate really, to show that the initial statement was NOT a lie, was NOT an anti-Catholic phony, false, made-up quote falsely ascribed to Trent...”
Except that it was a phony quote and only appears in anti-Catholic works.
It includes no context whatsoever - especially the previous sentences - which would show a completely different understanding of the text.
It was not issued by the full Council of Trent but by a committee.
Thus, the quote is a distortion using a particular translation (”that book”) made to attack the Church. It was adopted only by anti-Catholics to provoke the worst possible reaction; it was seriously taken out of context (and anti-Catholics never seem to care about context).
Thanks for the in depth clarification...
Anyone reading the thread can easily see the official position of the Catholic religion on the reading and possession of the bible confirmed during the counsel of Trent ...
The position was created by a committee that was sanctioned by the so called leaders of the counsel at Trent and adapted as the official Catholic Church rule(s) as researched and reported by the Catholic Fordham University...
Any naysayers and wannabe wordsmiths are just background noise trying to deflect traffic away from another one of the unpopular, unGodly, seldom spoken truths of the Catholic religion...