Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Control Bill Would Subject Firearms to Consumer Safety Screening
CNSNews.com ^ | 6/11/03 | Robert B. Bluey

Posted on 06/11/2003 3:35:47 AM PDT by kattracks

Capitol Hill (CNSNews.com) - Federal legislation introduced Tuesday would subject firearms to scrutiny by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, a federal agency responsible for keeping tabs on products like nightlights and pancake makers.

Gun control advocates hailed the announcement, vowing to strike back at pro-gun lawmakers who supported legislation passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in April granting firearms manufacturers' immunity from negligence lawsuits.

The Firearms Safety and Consumer Protection Act, introduced by Sen. Jon S. Corzine (D-N.J.) and Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.), would give the Department of Justice authority to regulate the design, manufacture and distribution of guns.

Gun rights groups dismissed the effort. The National Rifle Association noted that firearms are already subject to many regulations. Even some states, such as California, have established their own guidelines.

"Apparently, Senator Corzine and Representative Kennedy haven't heard of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the government agency responsible for enforcing federal laws and regulations relating to firearms and explosives," spokesman Ted Novin said. "No other product is as highly regulated as firearms."

But the handful of gun control advocates who attended Tuesday's gathering disagreed with that assessment. Supporters of the bill, including the Violence Policy Center and Consumer Federation of America, complained that teddy bears and toy guns have to meet safety standards, while firearms do not.

The bill does not have bi-partisan support, and Kennedy conceded that it's not likely to reach President Bush's desk.

But Corzine said despite the divisiveness of gun control, tougher safety standards make sense for gun owners. He said the bill would ensure that safety features like magazine disconnects and load indicators were standard on every gun.

"Owning a shotgun that explodes in your hand when you're using a weapon is a real issue of consumer safety," he said. "We need to have someone overseeing this so that real guns are treated the same way toy guns are. I think we will be able to appeal to the common sense of those who believe very strongly in the Second Amendment."

Kennedy, whose Rhode Island district includes toymaker Hasbro, said the company's fake guns are scrutinized by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, while a firearms manufacturer faces no safety checks.

"If you're going to have guns, at least make sure they're manufactured properly," Kennedy said. "Part of the legislation we're introducing ensures that we're able to track and thereby determine which guns have the greatest accident rate, just like you would with any other product."

Besides giving the Justice Department authority to collect data on gun-related deaths and injuries, the bill also would allow the government to issue product recalls and warnings and limit the sale of firearms when no other remedy was available.

"The ulterior motive here, as it has been in the past, is for the restriction on firearms rights under this false premise to increase safety," said Gary Mehalik, spokesman for the National Shooting Sports Foundation. "The best way to ensure safety of the firearms is to have a safe human operator."

The foundation is pushing the Senate to adopt a measure that would make the firearms industry immune from negligence lawsuits. It's an issue that drew the ire of gun control supporters, including former Sen. Howard Metzenbaum (D-Ohio), who urged lawmakers to strike back.

But gun control advocates are also facing the prospect that the 1994 federal ban on so-called "assault weapons" will expire in September 2004 without reauthorization from Congress. A lack of congressional support for the ban might doom its renewal, even though Bush supports it.

Without having seen a copy of the Corzine-Kennedy bill, Mehalik said it was difficult to know the breadth of the regulation that had been proposed, but he said gun makers are doing an adequate job producing safe firearms, as they have been for more than 100 years.

In fact, he said, gun owners have been abiding by safety techniques since the 19th century, when cowboys carried five bullets in six-shooters for fear that the gun might discharge if it was dropped. Today, manufactures are equipping firearms with high-tech safety devices, but Mehalik said they could only go so far to protect people.

"The only foolproof way to make sure a firearm does not accidentally shoot is to keep it unloaded and your finger off the trigger," Mehalik said. "Any attempt to create some mechanical contraption that's going to override the human involvement that's required for firearms safety is bound to fail."

E-mail a news tip to Robert B. Bluey.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.




TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

1 posted on 06/11/2003 3:35:48 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
World class idiots. They've never owned and learned how to use a gun. Of course guns are deadly. Otherwise why have them? Sheesh...
2 posted on 06/11/2003 3:46:43 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Owning a shotgun that explodes in your hand when you're using a weapon is a real issue of consumer safety,"

Thank God for Corzine's concern..There's been an epidemic of this for some time! /sarcasm/off

3 posted on 06/11/2003 3:47:44 AM PDT by bullseye1911 (When idiots are outlawed, the Senate will be a very lonely place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bullseye1911
Jon Corzine seems to think a safe gun should never be capable of firing a shot. Bwahahahahaha!!!
4 posted on 06/11/2003 3:49:18 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Owning a shotgun that explodes in your hand when you're using a weapon is a real issue of consumer safety," he said.

As well as a virtual non-problem.

5 posted on 06/11/2003 3:50:19 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The Firearms Safety and Consumer Protection Act, introduced by Sen. Jon S. Corzine (D-N.J.) and Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.), would give the Department of Justice authority to regulate the design, manufacture and distribution of guns."

Somebody obviously forgot to tell these two numbnuts the "new Democrat consensus" that the gun control issue was a "loser issue" and that the Democrats "wan't gonna do dat anymo'".

6 posted on 06/11/2003 3:51:36 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bullseye1911
I know the answer: all guns must require an idiotic warning label "DO NOT PLACE FOREIGN MATERIAL IN THE END OF THE BARREL"
7 posted on 06/11/2003 3:52:37 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Yep. The government according to them knows more about guns than the entire experience of the firearms industry combined. That's liberalism for y'all.
8 posted on 06/11/2003 3:53:11 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What an idiot. Magazine disconnects, loaded indicators, etc. should be features providing consumers more buying options. Whereas I might choose a pistol with a loaded indicator over another without, there's no way in hell I'd choose a pistol with a magazine disconnect. That's my choice and no congresscritter should interfere in my choice.

This yutz's bill should be retitled "Firearms for Dummies".

9 posted on 06/11/2003 4:25:52 AM PDT by Jonah Hex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I can't wait to read the text of this one.

I bet there is an "also for other purposes" line affixed to the title.

10 posted on 06/11/2003 4:29:29 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Warning, placing barrel in mouth and pulling trigger could result in serious injury." Sheez
11 posted on 06/11/2003 4:52:09 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Would you like to try our extra value meal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flurry
LOL! I invite these dumb and dumberer to put loaded pistols in their mouths and give us their expert opinions after they've pulled the triggers. That is, if they're still around to give one.
12 posted on 06/11/2003 4:54:08 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
It's the same garbage that they have in Kalifornia. Gun mfr. can't sell their products there unless it meets THEIR guidelines.

BUT, it's ok for a woman to systematically kill the unborn child in her womb.Hmmm, perhaps there needs to be safety wombs?

If it saves just ONE child.....<sarcasm

13 posted on 06/11/2003 4:56:19 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Somebody obviously forgot to tell these two numbnuts the "new Democrat consensus" that the gun control issue was a "loser issue" and that the Democrats "wan't gonna do dat anymo'".

Unfortunately there are some sections of the USA (I'm ashamed to say) where this sort of garbage sits well with the populace. NY, RI, MA, CT, NJ, MD, IL, and the Peoples' Democracy of Kalifornia all come to mind. The morons of NY keep voting into office shrill anti-gun morons like upChuckie Schemer and Carolyn McCarthy. McCarthy's sole issue that got here elected was a promise to further strip away the 2nd Amendment rights of free Americans. She won by a large margin too.

14 posted on 06/11/2003 4:57:58 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
bang
15 posted on 06/11/2003 4:58:09 AM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Firearms were specifically exempted from the purview of the Consumer Product Safety Commission because it was well understood that the CPSC would use its powers to effectively ban guns. I wish I had a link to the article that explained the history of that. It was interesting.
16 posted on 06/11/2003 5:00:40 AM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Consumer safety is a joke. All they have done is driven the price of production up and the quality down on 90% of the products we need. I remember when a lawnmower could be used to cut grass.
17 posted on 06/11/2003 5:01:04 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Would you like to try our extra value meal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
Which is exactly what the gun-banners want to see happen. The BS about "gun safety" is simply a smokescreen to hide their true agenda.
18 posted on 06/11/2003 5:04:01 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"I think we will be able to appeal to the common sense of those who believe very strongly in the Second Amendment."

The magic phrase 'common sense gun control' appears yet again.

19 posted on 06/11/2003 5:10:25 AM PDT by pa_dweller (This space left blank intentionally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Next step: annual inspections for "emissions testing." Add to that a hefty processing fee.
20 posted on 06/11/2003 5:17:40 AM PDT by NautiNurse (If Lawton Chiles runs for the Senate seat in 2004, we will **really** have Jurassic Park in Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson