Skip to comments.
Gun Control Bill Would Subject Firearms to Consumer Safety Screening
CNSNews.com ^
| 6/11/03
| Robert B. Bluey
Posted on 06/11/2003 3:35:47 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
1
posted on
06/11/2003 3:35:48 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
World class idiots. They've never owned and learned how to use a gun. Of course guns are deadly. Otherwise why have them? Sheesh...
2
posted on
06/11/2003 3:46:43 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: kattracks
Owning a shotgun that explodes in your hand when you're using a weapon is a real issue of consumer safety," Thank God for Corzine's concern..There's been an epidemic of this for some time! /sarcasm/off
3
posted on
06/11/2003 3:47:44 AM PDT
by
bullseye1911
(When idiots are outlawed, the Senate will be a very lonely place)
To: bullseye1911
Jon Corzine seems to think a safe gun should never be capable of firing a shot. Bwahahahahaha!!!
4
posted on
06/11/2003 3:49:18 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: kattracks
"Owning a shotgun that explodes in your hand when you're using a weapon is a real issue of consumer safety," he said. As well as a virtual non-problem.
To: kattracks
"The Firearms Safety and Consumer Protection Act, introduced by Sen. Jon S. Corzine (D-N.J.) and Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.), would give the Department of Justice authority to regulate the design, manufacture and distribution of guns." Somebody obviously forgot to tell these two numbnuts the "new Democrat consensus" that the gun control issue was a "loser issue" and that the Democrats "wan't gonna do dat anymo'".
To: bullseye1911
I know the answer: all guns must require an idiotic warning label "DO NOT PLACE FOREIGN MATERIAL IN THE END OF THE BARREL"
To: Wonder Warthog
Yep. The government according to them knows more about guns than the entire experience of the firearms industry combined. That's liberalism for y'all.
8
posted on
06/11/2003 3:53:11 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: kattracks
What an idiot. Magazine disconnects, loaded indicators, etc. should be
features providing consumers more buying options. Whereas I might choose a pistol with a loaded indicator over another without, there's no way in hell I'd choose a pistol with a magazine disconnect. That's my choice and no congresscritter should interfere in my choice.
This yutz's bill should be retitled "Firearms for Dummies".
9
posted on
06/11/2003 4:25:52 AM PDT
by
Jonah Hex
To: kattracks
I can't wait to read the text of this one.
I bet there is an "also for other purposes" line affixed to the title.
To: kattracks
"Warning, placing barrel in mouth and pulling trigger could result in serious injury." Sheez
11
posted on
06/11/2003 4:52:09 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Would you like to try our extra value meal?)
To: Flurry
LOL! I invite these dumb and dumberer to put loaded pistols in their mouths and give us their expert opinions after they've pulled the triggers. That is, if they're still around to give one.
12
posted on
06/11/2003 4:54:08 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: OXENinFLA
It's the same garbage that they have in Kalifornia. Gun mfr. can't sell their products there unless it meets THEIR guidelines.
BUT, it's ok for a woman to systematically kill the unborn child in her womb.Hmmm, perhaps there needs to be safety wombs?
If it saves just ONE child.....<sarcasm
13
posted on
06/11/2003 4:56:19 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Wonder Warthog
Somebody obviously forgot to tell these two numbnuts the "new Democrat consensus" that the gun control issue was a "loser issue" and that the Democrats "wan't gonna do dat anymo'".Unfortunately there are some sections of the USA (I'm ashamed to say) where this sort of garbage sits well with the populace. NY, RI, MA, CT, NJ, MD, IL, and the Peoples' Democracy of Kalifornia all come to mind. The morons of NY keep voting into office shrill anti-gun morons like upChuckie Schemer and Carolyn McCarthy. McCarthy's sole issue that got here elected was a promise to further strip away the 2nd Amendment rights of free Americans. She won by a large margin too.
14
posted on
06/11/2003 4:57:58 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: *bang_list
bang
To: kattracks
Firearms were specifically exempted from the purview of the Consumer Product Safety Commission because it was well understood that the CPSC would use its powers to effectively ban guns. I wish I had a link to the article that explained the history of that. It was interesting.
To: goldstategop
Consumer safety is a joke. All they have done is driven the price of production up and the quality down on 90% of the products we need. I remember when a lawnmower could be used to cut grass.
17
posted on
06/11/2003 5:01:04 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Would you like to try our extra value meal?)
To: RogueIsland
Which is exactly what the gun-banners want to see happen. The BS about "gun safety" is simply a smokescreen to hide their true agenda.
18
posted on
06/11/2003 5:04:01 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: kattracks
"I think we will be able to appeal to the common sense of those who believe very strongly in the Second Amendment." The magic phrase 'common sense gun control' appears yet again.
19
posted on
06/11/2003 5:10:25 AM PDT
by
pa_dweller
(This space left blank intentionally)
To: kattracks
Next step: annual inspections for "emissions testing." Add to that a hefty processing fee.
20
posted on
06/11/2003 5:17:40 AM PDT
by
NautiNurse
(If Lawton Chiles runs for the Senate seat in 2004, we will **really** have Jurassic Park in Florida)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson