Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Communist Party And The American Media Elite
CNSNews.com ^ | October 11, 2002 | Daniel G. Jennings

Posted on 10/11/2002 7:21:39 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

Is America's left-wing media elite about to suffer the fate of the Communist Party of the old Soviet Union? I ask this question because my weekend reading (Dimitri Volkogonov's history of the Soviet leadership, "Anatomy of An Empire," and Mark Mathis' tome on the U.S. media, "Feeding the Media Beast") raised some interesting parallels between the Soviet leadership and the current structure of the U.S. news media.

The similarities between Volkogonov's description of the behavior of the Soviet party leaders and recent revelations by Mathis and others about the thought processes, biases, behaviors and prejudices of American reporters are uncanny.

Volkogonov, a Red Army general who advised and observed the last few Soviet bosses first hand, described the Soviet leadership as a cadre of naive, ignorant, narrow-minded, lazy, short-sighted, bigoted and arrogant men with an uncompromising and absolute belief in a simplistic, shallow and completely erroneous ideology.

Mathis, a former TV reporter and anchor, and former CBS newsman Bernard Goldberg offer a similar description of today's American media elitists; a cadre of narrow-minded, ignorant, lazy, short-sighted, bigoted and arrogant people with an absolute belief in a silly, simplistic, shallow and completely erroneous ideology.

Like the Soviet leaders, the media elitists publicly espouse high ideals and concern for the common man while privately behaving like aristocrats and devoting most of their energies to protecting, preserving and increasing their wealth, power and privilege.

Goldberg revealed that when newswoman Connie Chung's popularity started to rival that of Dan Rather's, Rather deliberately destroyed her career - much as the Soviet Communist Party bosses deliberately stripped Marshal Zhukov, the great Russian hero of World War II, of his power and position because he was more popular than they were. Get the picture? Rather's position as the number one news anchor is more important than anything else.

The similarities go beyond this. The Communist bosses believed that they had an absolute mandate to rule the Soviet Union, and that their ideology was absolutely correct. The American media elite believes that the collection of prejudices, half-truths, truisms and liberal politics it calls an ideology is the absolute truth and that they have an absolute right to force those truths on the American people - just as the Communists believed that their ideology was the gospel truth and that they had an absolute moral right to force their beliefs on the Russian people by any means possible.

The old men in the Kremlin just couldn't understand the simple fact that their ideology and the system based upon it couldn't and wouldn't work. They couldn't understand why Soviet agriculture, industry and technology weren't able to keep up with other nations and why the Russian people weren't happy under their rule.

America's media elite can't grasp the obvious truth that the liberal system and ideology they favor simply doesn't work and is actually harming the nation. (For example: social problems like poverty, homelessness and racism haven't disappeared despite massive government programs and high taxes; racism hasn't disappeared despite political correctness; liberal policies may be harming the family and encouraging crime; liberal peace agendas may actually encourage war and conflict with other nations etc.)

Today's news media leaders find themselves in a similar situation to the Soviet leaders. They retain much of their power, position and influence but nobody actually believes in them or their ideology any more, just as the Russian public in the 1970s and 80s considered the Soviet leadership a bad joke and saw the obvious truth that Communism was a shoddy lie.

Average Americans today consider the media leadership (particularly the big three network anchormen Tom Brokaw, Peter Jennings and Dan Rather) a bad joke and no longer believe anything the big media says.

According to the Pew Research Center, two-thirds of Americans do not believe what they see on the TV news is real. Radio talker Rush Limbaugh now probably has more influence than all major TV news personalities put together.

Rather, in particular, can't understand why he is not a beloved and influential national figure like Walter Cronkite was at the height of his popularity. In the same way, Leonid Brezhnev failed to grasp why he couldn't command the kind of respect and fear as a Soviet leader that Lenin and Stalin did.

The media leaders' behavior in light of these developments is interesting. At first, they ignored them like the Soviet leaders. Then when the evidence became too convincing, the media leaders started to make superficial changes rather than real or substantial reforms much like the Soviet leaders did.

Just as Gorbachev allowed McDonalds to open in Red Square but failed to reform Soviet agriculture, the media elitists cover their broadcasts with flags and write books praising World War II veterans rather than implement policies of balanced reporting, hire a better grade of journalists, or give the most blatantly biased reporters the boot.

The Communist Party leaders ignored or tried to silence their critics - the Russian dissidents. The media elitists also have ignored and tried to silence their critics, especially those news people who have dared criticize them. For years, they deliberately destroyed the careers of those news people who voiced views counter to the `party line.'

Remember the discipline conservative ABC newsman John Stossel faced for practicing the same kind of biased reporting as the rest of his reporters? Stossel's crime was not filing biased stories based on questionable and inaccurate information (something of which Stossel was undoubtedly guilty). It was attacking liberal sacred cows and adopting a conservative bias. More recently they have thrown individuals like Goldberg who raised legitimate criticisms out of their organizations and ignored them.

Like the Communist Party bosses, the media elitists have failed to see the disastrous situation they've created for themselves. And like the Communist Party bosses, the media elitists will probably find themselves out in the cold when their system collapses.

(Daniel G. Jennings is a freelance writer and journalist who lives and works in Denver, Colo. He has worked as a reporter and editor for daily and weekly newspapers in five states.)

Free Congress Foundation




TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bernardgoldberg; communistparty; danielgjennings; danrather; elitists; homelessness; liberal; mathis; media; peterjennings; poverty; racism; rushlimbaugh; sovietunion; tombrokaw; volkogonov
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 10/11/2002 7:21:39 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Good read thanks for posting.
2 posted on 10/11/2002 7:36:29 AM PDT by Rays_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Truth, and justice always prevail, it just seems to take time. Here we have the truth, said in a nutshell.

I watched Goldberg on donohue last nite he was great!

Lets support the right and watch the commies fall.
Ops4 God Bless America!

3 posted on 10/11/2002 7:40:34 AM PDT by OPS4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Thats a great way to look at it. I think I can see his logic as being good news for the day.
4 posted on 10/11/2002 7:58:15 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Great analogy, can't help but nodding my head in agreement, as I read, point by point. Thanks for this post.
5 posted on 10/11/2002 8:13:54 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Yes, this is an excellent article. I will need to get the book.
6 posted on 10/11/2002 8:32:16 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rays_Dad
I thought every body already knew the American Media and the Communist Party have been pardners for years.
7 posted on 10/11/2002 8:40:48 AM PDT by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Also a big similarity in "the ends justify the means" mentality. Nothing matters (the facts, who gets hurt, what gets trampled on), as long as their ideology and hold on the reins remain intact.
8 posted on 10/11/2002 8:46:14 AM PDT by lds23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen; ForGod'sSake; Landru; Mr. Mulliner; Peacerose; calypgin
CCRM bump

CCRM is a Free Republic Network affiliate working to reduce media bias.

For a comprehensive overview of Freeper thoughts on Liberal Media bias, check out our website by clicking on graphic, or HERE: We call it Fairpress.org.

This thread is evidence that liberal bias is still with us. Come join our team and engage in the battle against the Liberal Media.

9 posted on 10/11/2002 8:59:57 AM PDT by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Stand Watch Listen
Rather...Lenin and Stalin So will Danny-boy call for non-fans to be sent to the gulag?
11 posted on 10/11/2002 9:04:24 AM PDT by oct11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Oh! so true. Communism, Socialism, Liberalism all poured from the same bunghole from same barrel of poison. Very cogent analysis I would say. Regan handled Soviet Communism, WELL!, for the journalist with a little of that spirit, that could pull off a total expose'..

I remember the day I read (Iceland meeting) Regan argued to the Russians, "We need a nuclear umbrella purely as a defensive weapon(against MADD), and we've developed one TOOOO", after some huffing, grandstanding, etc. from the Russians.

"AND WE WILL GIVE THE TECHNOLOGY TO (((YOU))) TOO, FOR FREE"

Pulled the farking rug right from under them iceholes .....
Bwahahahaha...(what a guy-Regan) Everybody knows what happened after that...
12 posted on 10/11/2002 9:32:56 AM PDT by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen; All
Great Article. Thanks.

a cadre of narrow-minded, ignorant, lazy, short-sighted, bigoted and arrogant people with an absolute belief in a silly, simplistic, shallow and completely erroneous ideology.

Like the Soviet leaders, the media elitists publicly espouse high ideals and concern for the common man while privately behaving like aristocrats and devoting most of their energies to protecting, preserving and increasing their wealth, power and privilege

That's also a description of the government. The government nor government officials are the highest authority. The individual is the highest authority. The US Constitution is the highest law of the land, not the government officials. Objective law is the authority for government and to be upheld by government officials. Government officials are not the authority for government.

Goldberg revealed that when newswoman Connie Chung's popularity started to rival that of Dan Rather's, Rather deliberately destroyed her career - much as the Soviet Communist Party bosses deliberately

That routine among opposing political candidates.

The Communist bosses believed that they had an absolute mandate to rule the Soviet Union, and that their ideology was absolutely correct. The American media elite believes that the collection of prejudices, half-truths, truisms and liberal politics it calls an ideology is the absolute truth and that they have an absolute right to force those truths on the American people

As if somehow people and society could not continue to prosper without 3,000 new laws and regulations this year and 3,000 new laws next year, year after year. How is that the working-class men and women were able to increase prosperity and well being for years and decades prior without this year's new laws, yet suddenly government officials proclaim that we working-class men and women will run headlong into destruction without them creating all those new laws. They proclaim from on high that they are "must-have" laws.

America's media elite can't grasp the obvious truth that the liberal system and ideology they favor simply doesn't work and is actually harming the nation.

Nor do government officials grasp the obvious honesty that voting for the lesser of evils doesn't work and is actually harming the citizens and society in general.

Today's news media leaders find themselves in a similar situation to the Soviet leaders. They retain much of their power, position and influence but nobody actually believes in them or their ideology any more, just as the Russian public in the 1970s and 80s considered the Soviet leadership a bad joke and saw the obvious truth that Communism was a shoddy lie.

Average Americans today consider the media leadership (particularly the big three network anchormen Tom Brokaw, Peter Jennings and Dan Rather) a bad joke and no longer believe anything the big media says.

Each day brings more and more people willfully dismissing themselves from bogus government authority.

According to the Pew Research Center, two-thirds of Americans do not believe what they see on the TV news is real. Radio talker Rush Limbaugh now probably has more influence than all major TV news personalities put together.

That is movement away from supposed higher authorities and deeper into individual authority. In the process, each day more people are abandon the media and politics.

Like the Communist Party bosses, the media elitists have failed to see the disastrous situation they've created for themselves. And like the Communist Party bosses, the media elitists will probably find themselves out in the cold when their system collapses.

Likewise, politicians and bureaucrats have failed to see the disastrous situation they've created for themselves. Like the Communist Party bosses, parasitical politicians and self-serving bureaucrats along with the media elitists will find themselves ostracized when their "system" collapses.

13 posted on 10/11/2002 11:23:19 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
racism hasn't disappeared despite because of political correctness;
14 posted on 10/11/2002 11:51:02 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Good post. The internet will be one of the tools to hasten the sorely needed demise of these pinheads. Bit by bit- chip away and fight back.
15 posted on 10/11/2002 12:59:37 PM PDT by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert; scholar; sultan88; Happygal
"...the media elitists publicly espouse high ideals and concern for the common man while privately behaving like aristocrats and devoting most of their energies to protecting, preserving and increasing their wealth, power and privilege."

Precisely; hence, the term, "Limosine Liberal"! :o)
The hypocracy of which isn't nearly as bad as how the Liberal-Socialist media's going about their *job* of destroying America, Capitalism, AND enriching themselves at the same time.

Take a good LOOK at the "Tax Status" these people at "Associated Press" et al are claiming & one'll find, almost unanimously, the media's Liberal-Socialists are filing as 501© (3) tax-free status organizations.
*Somewhat* reminicent of the *royals* exempting themselves from paying taxes up to relatively recently, eh?

The body politic had better get savvy to this particular virus, before the thing inevidably winds-up killing it.

In any event, I find the useful idiots who're comprising the talking heads we see, are mere puppets for those behind the scenes players who're really calling the shots.
I believe another article posted here a few weeks back had a name for these behind the curtain people responsible for pulling all the strings??
Quote: "As Robert Locke states in his article: 'Corporatism blends socialism and capitalism not by giving each control of different parts of the economy, but by combining socialism's promise of a government-guaranteed flow of material goods with capitalism's private ownership and management.'"
(refer: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/758695/posts )

Recall the term, "Corporatism"???

"Today's news media leaders find themselves in a similar situation to the Soviet leaders."

Yes, but by design!
I cannot believe the people responsible for everything we've been forced to endure are sitting around going, "Geeee, wa happuned?"
Baloney.

There're many similarities between the totalitarian regimes & the ruling elite thereof, v.s., today's media BigPigs.
I can easily agree with much of what this writer posits; however, by the same token?
There're some glaring misunderstandings concerning the Liberal-Socialist's motives behind this media of our's obscuring what I really believe they're up to, also.

"Like the Communist Party bosses, the media elitists have failed to see the disastrous situation they've created for themselves. And like the Communist Party bosses, the media elitists will probably find themselves out in the cold when their system collapses."

"Their system" [here] is, of course, their source of financing within our Capitalist nation, eh?

Those closest to the CCRM project have already noted there're several of the cable outfits who're in desperate financial trouble.
Either CNBC *or* MSNBC comes to mind right off the bat, as they've been forced to make changes in "producers" ("middle management," no less) et al in an effort to stop the $$ hemorrhging.
But you can bet your life there're most certainly others who're in some equally serious $$ trouble, also.
Thing is since they're making the "news" we'll not be hearing about their status until it's well into their 11th hour.

All-in-all an interesting read.

...thanks bert.

16 posted on 10/11/2002 1:52:56 PM PDT by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector; sleavelessinseattle; 2Trievers; swarthyguy; Lazamataz; Snow Bunny; MistyCA; ...
Ping.
17 posted on 10/11/2002 3:28:21 PM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Like the Soviet leaders, the media elitists publicly espouse high ideals and concern for the common man while privately behaving like aristocrats and devoting most of their energies to protecting, preserving and increasing their wealth, power and privilege.

The democrat party fits the description quite well... I guess thats why the media elite love democrats.

18 posted on 10/11/2002 3:33:26 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
This was coming long before 911, but after the attack Americans woke up with a jolt. Rather is by far the worst, closely followed by Couric & Lauer. Peter Jennings is an elitist moron that isn't even an American citizen, and Brokaw is a wondering mass of illogic that fails to make any point he tries. Their ratings are in the tank, and the American people would rather watch Fox (if only we all had cable). Newspapers are in worse trouble, most lefty fishwraps are tanking. When the NYSlimes prints it's final edition I swear I'll go to NYC, buy a copy, and go to Times Square and get arrested for public urination (guess what my target will be).

The American people are wide awake, and they don't like what they see. Our free press has turned against America and her values, they have turned against her people. The People are turning them off and tuning into Fox, or the internet, some just turn off the TV altogether and read a book, "Atlas Shrugged" in my case.

I am gleefully watching the decline of socialism and a restoration of truth in the American media. It is something I can tell my grandchildren about.

19 posted on 10/11/2002 3:34:45 PM PDT by timydnuc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Landru
Thank you for pinging me to this. And it is certainly interesting.

You know, I don't work in quite the same high powered field as those cited in the article. But with the same breath, I am blessed that my boss allows me to (once a week) write a column (along with the other hum drum crap I write! *L*) that sparks controversy. (BTW, in case you haven't noticed..I can't spell for nutz, that's what sub-editors are for!!! *L*)

Funny isn't it..when I write plain and honest truths, the dumbwits who can't fill in a job application form to get themselves off welfare, all of a sudden find themselves writing tomes in objection. *L* (when they do that though, I KNOW, I'm fighting the right fight)! *L*

Interesting too...the Irish Times (ye know the Up Chuck publication of the chattering classes, which is slowly going down the financial tubes) has just appointed a new editor. A woman. And a conservative (well in many respects).

The tide is a-turning.


I'm glad I don't have to compete in the American market though.
It would turn me off writing, period. I'd be a check-out girl at Wal-mart.
20 posted on 10/11/2002 6:16:30 PM PDT by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson