Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IS THIS A PERSON?
8/5/02 | jwalsh07

Posted on 08/05/2002 5:30:51 PM PDT by jwalsh07

AMENDMENT 14
SECTION 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

GE 4D Image Of a Baby



TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionismean; baby; catholiclist; constitution; halliburton; life; prolife; righttolife; unborn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 621-627 next last
To: Bowana
Fetus is latin for 'young one' or 'offspring'.
Is this 'young one' an individual?

May it come to pass that those who submit their children for murder and the people who carry forth that murder, have their lives taken in the same manner as the slain child. For this I pray.

241 posted on 08/06/2002 1:37:40 PM PDT by Outlaw76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: inquest
So, were unborn babies ever included in this tally of "Persons"? The answer to that question is the answer to yours.

Afraid not inquest. The purpose of the census was and is simply to aportion representation and taxes. It speaks not one wit to whether or not unborn babies are people. But chew on this. Blacks were only three fifiths of a person and there were laws against abortion as early as 1800, none of which were found to be unconstitutional.

242 posted on 08/06/2002 1:52:33 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Zon
So what if the appendage has a different DNA, the appendage is still the property of the person that it is attached to. I have not stated my position on abortion. How about you address the appendage issue instead of labeling me.

OK, I'll try once more. An appendage is attached to the trunk of something. The blood flowing through it and its genetic code are identical to the person or thing it is attached to and absent disease it poses no danger to that person unless it gets caught in the zipper.

A baby on the other hand has its own unique genetic code, its own blood supply and a placental barrier that seperates Mom and Baby? Would you care to know why that placental barrier exists?

243 posted on 08/06/2002 2:03:05 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington
It's got you stumped as you offer no argument that refutes the argument in post 223.
244 posted on 08/06/2002 2:12:35 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Two eyes, a nose a mouth that opens and shuts, two fists that move up and down. Sure looks like a little baby person to me.
245 posted on 08/06/2002 2:14:52 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bowana
A nice way to parse words to make a fetus (an unborn Human being) a non human being with no rights. Once the egg is fertilized and a human being is beginning to gestate to birth it is a human being with all the rights other human beings in our society have.
246 posted on 08/06/2002 2:18:17 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
Two eyes, a nose a mouth that opens and shuts, two fists that move up and down. Sure looks like a little baby person to me.

It is amazing the lenghts to which some folks go in order to deny what is right in front of their eyes. I don't get it, do you?

247 posted on 08/06/2002 2:19:38 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
You created your own definition of appendage. That's irrational.

appendage:
1 : an adjunct to something larger or more important
2 : a subordinate or derivative body part; especially : a limb or analogous part (as a seta)

A woman's fetus is an appendage of the woman and is the woman's property.

248 posted on 08/06/2002 2:22:36 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Bowana
The fetus as you so liberally refer to the unborn child ( person) is not self suffieient after it is born either. The only difference is that instead of receiving oxygen and nourishment through the mother's blood (before birth) once born it can breath (recieve oxygen) on it's own. But it still cannot feed itself, or work, or walk, or talk, or maybe it can't even see, or dress itself, does that make it now a born fetus, in waiting, to become a self sufficent person? It is still dependant on the mother, or mother substitute. But being dependant, it has no rights as a human being? This is double talk and nonsense. A baby is a baby before and after it is born. It is alive in both instances.
249 posted on 08/06/2002 2:25:55 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Yes.
250 posted on 08/06/2002 2:27:26 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steelwheels
Wanted? Wanted by whom? The irresponsible mother and father? There are people out there who would want, or want to take care of this "unwanted baby".
251 posted on 08/06/2002 2:29:19 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bowana
Maybe you sould define an individual in your eyes.
252 posted on 08/06/2002 2:30:46 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
You sure you're not a politician?

No, but I play one on TV! :>)

253 posted on 08/06/2002 2:33:56 PM PDT by Bowana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
Pro-life? I don't think so. They should be called "Pro-Fetus/Anti-Mom/Anti-Doctor". They are just bitter and full of hate. It's very hypocrital.

Let's see. You espouse a defense of abortion which is in my view the killing of babies yet you are arguably FR's most vocal anti-hunting siren. Do you value a wild animal more than a "fetus" as you prefer to call them?

254 posted on 08/06/2002 2:34:42 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: inquest

 

Slavery Abortion
SPOKEN BY SOMEONE ALREADY FREE SPOKEN BY SOMEONE ALREADY BORN

Although he may have a heart and a brain, and he may be human life biologically, a slave is not a legal person. The Dred Scott decision by the U.S. Supreme Court has made that clear.

Although he may have a heart and a brain, and he may be a human life biologically, an unborn baby is not a legal person. The Wade v. Roe decision by the U.S. Supreme Court has made that clear.

A black man only becomes a legal person when he is set free. Before that time, we should not concern ourselves about him. He has no legal rights.

A baby only becomes a legal person when he is born. Before that time, we should not concern ourselves about him. He has no legal rights.

If you think slavery is wrong, then nobody is forcing you to be a slave-owner. But don't impose your morality on somebody else!

If you think abortion is wrong, then nobody is forcing you to have one. But don't impose your morality on somebody else!

A man has a right to do what he wants with his own property.

A woman has a right to do what she wants with her own body.

Isn't slavery really something merciful? After all, every black man has the right to be protected. Isn't it better never to be set free than to be sent unprepared, and ill-equipped, into a cruel world? Isn't abortion really something merciful? After all, every baby has a right to be wanted. Isn't it better never to be born than to be sent alone and unloved into a cruel world?

 

1857
(Dred Scott decision)

1973
(Wade v Roe decision)


255 posted on 08/06/2002 2:35:40 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Zon
I hope you're tort lawyer. Your sense of "logic" is remarkable.
256 posted on 08/06/2002 2:38:24 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Zon
You created your own definition of appendage. That's irrational.

LOL. I'm irrational? You're argument sucks, it doesn't pass the laugh test, the genetic test,the blood test or the placental barrier test.

Why don't you simply say that it is a person but that you think these persons should be subject to abortion at the will of the Mother. That's an honest, albeit wrong in my view, position to take. The appendage argument is ridiculous.

257 posted on 08/06/2002 2:39:10 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
They don't pay taxes, therefore in the eyes of big brother, they don't exist.

LOL!

I know people that have never paid taxes, they sure do vote, though.

258 posted on 08/06/2002 2:41:21 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Thanks for dropping by.
259 posted on 08/06/2002 2:50:29 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
Is a tube fed human an individual? A person? How about a human on dialysis?

YES, they are "Persons". They are each separate and individual. A fetus inside and connected to the mother is not.

Are you an attorney?

I didn't mind being asked if I was a politician, but an attorney?

THOSE ARE FIGHTING WORDS!

260 posted on 08/06/2002 2:51:22 PM PDT by Bowana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 621-627 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson