Posted on 07/02/2002 7:56:05 AM PDT by white trash redneck
Edited on 06/29/2004 7:09:17 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
NEW YORK -- The AIDS epidemic is not close to reaching its peak, the United Nations says in a devastating report released Tuesday.
The epidemic has reached proportions once considered impossible in the world's most affected countries and is spreading at alarming rates elsewhere. The crisis "now outstrips even the worst-case scenarios" projected by epidemiologists tracking the deadliest disease in human history, the report says.
(Excerpt) Read more at wired.com ...
Sure seems handy to have all those pesky indiginous people dying of disease and starvation and tribe warfare in a county rich with natural resources.
Concise and to the point.
YES, AIDS exists and it is B-A-D but unless you're having unprotected sex with homosexuals, bisexuals, and/or especially IV DRUG USERS...the odds on catching the virus are extremely remote. This does not hold true for 3rd world countries. Mainly because they don't have our medical expertise and their definitions for the virus are different than ours.
Haven't read "Bias", but found Fumento to be spot on. His late '80s, early '90s analysis and reasoning clearly explained why AIDS would not be spread heterosexually in the United States. At the time, Whoopi and pals were trying to paint the disease as an equal opportunity killer with everyone at risk. Homosexuals nearly wet themselves trying to have his ideas censored. Turns out he was right, they were wrong.
With the U.S. no longer available as a playground for their lies, they've had to move the war on truth elsewhere. Not surprisingly, none in the liberal media have seen fit to circle back and see the extent of the damage to the public trust these lies caused and who was responsible. Unlike the malfeasance at Enron and Worldcom, the liberal press has no interest in holding the AIDS liars accountable so they will feel free to continue to engage in lying to advance their causes.
AIDS is indeed difficult to transmit becuase it requires blood contact of the recipient. Most of us don't draw blood during sex. However, in third world countries, the rates of open sores on the genitals is much higher than here, and their heterosexual transmission rates can be higher than ours.
Certain elements will get/have gotten the Darwin award, flame away as you will.
Let this be the first of many lands to be restored to their rightful owners, remember that theft of the land by outbreeding one's neighbor, is still theft.
Be not deceived, God is not mocked. For whatsoever a man soweth, that he shall also reap.
This news outlet appears to have been hijacked by an AIDS activist or 100. In the last week we have seen headlines on AIDS in Africa, AIDS cure in five years, AIDS in unaware young men and today we get a double dose of agenda forwarding in the form of two titles - "HIV expected to skyrocket in youths" and "HIV in U.S. newborns down 80%".
I don't know about you but I don't like being force fed a subject to serve the agenda of a certain group of people who want their problem solved to the exclusion of everyone else. It ok if it's an advocacy group but not an advocacy group cloaked in the aura of legitimate news outlet. Let's see what the AIDS topic du jour will be tomorrow. If past performance is a future indicator, the onslaught should continue.
I'm not seeing it. Perhps you can explain what we have to be frightened of?
A very simple minded statement....but you are entitled. However, if the statement were true, why did HIV/AIDS suddenly appear about 20 years ago? Was there no sexual deviation before then?? Also, are all blood borne diseases "all about sexual deviancy"? Like Hepatitis C. That disease is very similar to HIV/AIDS in its transmission. Oh and one other thing.....are you aware that the vast majority of HIV/AIDS cases in the world are from traditional heterosexual activity? Those folks aren't going to San Francisco bath houses to get it. By the way, you won't hear your statement from me...and I am not from the left.
Also, there is Asia, Thailand and, increasingly, China and India. Numbers can't be cooked everywhere.
Perhaps the numbers are cooked in Africa, but there is also a cultural squeamishness about AIDs that would work to keep the numbers lower. I suspect that conditions in Africa are pretty bad where AIDS is concerned
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.