Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate condemns Pledge ruling by 99-0 margin
Fox News

Posted on 06/26/2002 2:52:30 PM PDT by mrobison

The U. S. Senate has condemned the Ninth Circuit Court's ruling on the Pledge of Allegience by a 99-0 margin.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 next last
To: oldtimer
This should be a wake-up call for Leahy and dem cohorts to get those Bush judicial nominees rolling rolling!
121 posted on 06/26/2002 5:18:16 PM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: freeper12
I would.. it sends a very strong message to Supreme Court.. take this ruling and shove it! They'll get and slap the 9th around. Remember they are embodiment of the people.. hell looks like even the hard core liberal junkies know when the bus has gone to far.
122 posted on 06/26/2002 5:26:37 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Neanderthal
How about a Constitutional amendment of the kind that Robert Bork proposed: that by a supermajority vote of both houses of Congress, any court decision in the land may be reversed.
123 posted on 06/26/2002 5:28:19 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Their rationale is fallacious....These judges are fools

Small wonder, as these traits are prerequisites of the liberal.

124 posted on 06/26/2002 5:29:23 PM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
SET ASIDE THE DECISION
OF THE 9TH CIRCUIT COURT

FR Thread on the same

125 posted on 06/26/2002 5:34:09 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
Good God, good for them!!!!!
126 posted on 06/26/2002 5:46:16 PM PDT by Colonel Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: berned
http://www.syberpunk.com/images/tv/yatta/waru.jpg

Hehehehe...clever.

127 posted on 06/26/2002 5:57:58 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
The only reason Dems went along with this is because it is a election year and they know conservative are ready to march on the polls!!!
128 posted on 06/26/2002 6:12:18 PM PDT by Trueblackman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unix; berned
WHoops...wrong cut and paste partner!! I liked your post eraly on about Specter...
Damn TexAggie79 and the Yatta crap earlier...sheesh!
129 posted on 06/26/2002 6:17:04 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
Small wonder, as these traits are prerequisites of the liberal.

The liberals worship Hillary and Bill and never objected when they used the word "God" to try to fool people into voting for them. Liberals are the biggest hypocrits you can find anywhere.

130 posted on 06/26/2002 6:26:05 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
BUMP
These idiot judges need to be removed from office now. They are ruining our country and destroying our freedoms!
131 posted on 06/26/2002 6:54:31 PM PDT by JustAmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
Yeah, like these guys would dare vote otherwise. I'm still waiting on that Bill of Censure for Clinton.
132 posted on 06/26/2002 6:58:51 PM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Thanks Saber. Let's see what happens next.


133 posted on 06/26/2002 7:04:14 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
The demacrooks must be scared to death, the Republicans are going to lay into them hard this election for permitting goof ball judges like these on the Federal Courts.
134 posted on 06/26/2002 7:30:14 PM PDT by Colombia59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw
This is the one thing our Founders were afraid of: Judicial Sophistry.
135 posted on 06/26/2002 7:31:29 PM PDT by Goldi-Lox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
How many of these hypocrite scumbag Democrat Senators are holding Bush's nominees hostage because these scumbag liberal judges they are "condemning" are exactly the kind of judges they want?
Puke. Scumbags.
136 posted on 06/26/2002 7:57:31 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
If the Republicans don't play this to the absolute hilt, screaming from the rooftops for the next month, at least, I will not be sending them any money anytime soon.

This ruling is a gift from heaven, demonstrating for all the nation to see what it is that Leahy, Daschole, Clinton and the rest of that disgusting scumbag ilk want in a judicial nominee.

"Liberal... Liberal... Liberal..., Liberal..., Liberal...!",

....is what the Republicans better be screaming for at least the next month.
They cannot let this opportunity pass.

137 posted on 06/26/2002 8:07:43 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
S00OO, they, the Dems, will come out lukewarm in opposition to the Circuit Court ruling. BUT, NOT strong enough to annoy their liberal base, but strong enough to be registered as an angry vote, so they are on record as going along with the Republicans and ergo not subject to being politically attacked.

Midterm elections are all about getting your base so pissed off that they run over broken effing glass to get to the polls.

Basically two liberal judges on the Ninth Circuit couldn't leave well enough alone and had to make the law an ass. This is the Constitutional equivalent of a McDonald's burning coffee cup case, but what's great is that its ridiculousness combines with its sheer widespread effect on an American institution, the Pledge. In an environment in which the Senate is at stake, this is the kind of business that could tip the balance way in our favor.

Folks, the two happiest men in the world right now are Karl Rove and Bill Simon.

This is a Godsend for us. As other posters have indicated, the President and his people have assiduously laid the groundwork for a "do-nothing" Senate charge to be laid at the feet of Tom Daschle and Pat Leahy. The charge of Obstructionism has been slowly but surely seeded into the minds of the voting public.

This is the kind of decision that will piss off, and I do mean piss off Conservatives, Republicans, and Reagan Democrats all over the United States. In the midst of a war against Islamic fascists, a Fruits and Nuts Federal Appellate Court tells us we can't have our kids say "under God" in classrooms? There is a reason Tom Daschle responded like lighting. He just realized that this kind of thing will not bode well for his protege, Tim Johnson.

His Senate Democrats are on the knife edge of defeat. The Little Dictator knows that the Republican base vote just got pissed off. He also knows that this decision satisfies some of his base liberals, but not enough to counter the anger that will arise from the Republican Party. In an election where everything is close, this tips things our way.

And Karl Rove is happy because he just had a big problem solved for him. He knew that his base liked the President, but he was not sure that that would be enough to get his base, plus the Marginal Conservatives, out to vote in the fall. Problem solved, imho. This is just the kind of wedge issue that will come as a shock to people all over the country as it hits the papers in the morning.

Bill Simon will benefit from angry voters as well, hopefully in places like Orange County and parts of Upstate.

I don't see a plus in this for Gray Davis.

Most of all, the President gets to say "see, I told you so! Now let me have my judges, Obstructionists!"

I don't see how all the "quick strategizing" on this one helps the Dims at all. This goes right to our argument about "liberal judges". I don't care if this decision reads like Strict Construction. It is Strict Construction taken to its extreme: the Framers never intended to drive God from the Public Square, they merely endeavored to prevent the establishment of a State Religion. It will be interesting to see how Scalia handles this, but in the meantime, we get to kick some butts.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

138 posted on 06/26/2002 8:10:54 PM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Colombia59
The demacrooks must be scared to death, the Republicans are going to lay into them hard this election for permitting goof ball judges like these on the Federal Courts.

If they don't, they are utter fools.
But I have been disappointed too many times in the past by Republican spinelessness, and I will wait anxiously for the beating to begin.
That beating better be relentless and merciless.

139 posted on 06/26/2002 8:11:59 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
You know, it occurs to me that when the Supremes banned prayer it was a matter of a practice--no deity specified.

These clowns in the 9th Circus Court of Appeals have specifically said the word "God" is not allowed to be uttered in any type of government function/entity.

Hmmm...wonder what He's going to think of that?

140 posted on 06/26/2002 8:21:25 PM PDT by twntaipan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson