Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Formation of New Species Proves Gradual, Not Sudden
UniSci ^ | May 28, 2002

Posted on 05/31/2002 5:45:53 AM PDT by JediGirl

Home Search

 

clear.gif (52 bytes)


Formation Of New Species Proves Gradual, Not Sudden

The formation of new species is a gradual and not a sudden process, according to a team of biologists from the UK, France, Australia and the USA.

Their findings, from a study of birds on Pacific islands, are reported in today's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

The "founder effect" theory, a controversial idea among biologists, says that speciation occurs suddenly due to a small influx of colonists founding new populations, in the process creating many new gene combinations and losing many others, in what is known as a "genetic revolution."

But according to the team's new evidence from fieldwork and computer modeling, the theory doesn't apply to island birds, and the way in which populations change their genetic diversity is a result of successive colonization events and long-term genetic drift.

"Our results indicate that speciation in island birds occurs gradually, not suddenly as a result of island colonization through founder effects," said Dr. Sonya Clegg of Imperial College London.

In order to carry out the work, Dr. Clegg and her collaborators visited a series of islands through the southwest Pacific.

Dr. Clegg said: "The result is exciting because this is the first time the theory has been tested using natural populations. Previous tests have used artificially introduced ones, which don't tell you much about how real biodiversity evolves.

"It's obvious that genetic changes can occur if a single pair of individuals founds a population, but the question is whether that really happens. Our results suggest that it doesn't."

The scientists tested the founder effect model in an unusual island bird species, the Silvereye (Zosterops lateralis), which has colonized a series of islands in the southwest Pacific from the Australian mainland during the last 200 years.

The Silvereye's pattern of colonization there was originally used to support the founder effect model, first proposed by Ernst Mayr in 1954. Though subsequently tested in lab studies and artificial populations, up until now the theory had been untested in a natural population because of the need to know the colonization date for a series of island populations.

The southwest Pacific islands benefit from a well-documented history of such events, and DNA samples were taken from birds captured on the islands to be compared with samples from Silvereye colonies on the Australian mainland and with samples from island populations of Silvereyes known to be founded over 3,000 years ago.

This allowed the scientists to make the crucial contrast between genetic changes in recent and old island populations.

Their computer models of evolution based on these data showed that single founder effects do not lead to strong genetic changes in the Silvereye population, contrary to the founder effect model.

Instead, genetic changes build up gradually -- either as a result of long-term genetic drift or through multiple bottlenecks. The authors estimate that the average successful founding flock would number more than 100 birds.

Laboratory-based studies have shown that founder effect models can work, but only under very restrictive circumstances, for example, with a very small number of colonists. A natural population with known colonization dates is very rare and most studies have been done on artificially introduced populations, which limit the value of subsequent results because humans have set the size of the colonizing group.

The research team included scientists from the Department of Biological Sciences and Natural Environment Research Council Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College, London; the Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Queensland, Australia; Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, Campus International de Baillarguet, Montferrier/Lez cedex, France, and the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley.

The Australian Research Council and the Stuart Leslie Fund (Birds Australia) funded the work.

(Reference: Genetic consequences of sequential founder events by an island-colonizing bird. Authors: Sonya M. Clegg, Sandie M. Degnan, Jiro Kikkawa, Craig Moritz, Arnaud Estoup and Ian P. F. Owens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. May 28, 2002.)

Related websites:

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)

Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine

[Contact: Dr. Sonya Clegg, Tom Miller]

28-May-2002

 

 

 

 

clear.gif (52 bytes)

Add the UniSci Daily Java News Ticker to Your Site or Desktop.
Click for a demo and more information.

 

HOME | ARCHIVES | ABOUT | PIOs | BYLINES | WHY SCIENCE | WHY UNISCI | PROSTATE | POLIO

Copyright © 1995-2002 UniSci. All rights reserved.



TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: creation; crevolist; evolution; science

1 posted on 05/31/2002 5:45:53 AM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *crevo_list
ping
2 posted on 05/31/2002 5:46:37 AM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: semper_libertas
Amen. Try as they will the Darwinists cannot prove that one kind of animal turns into another distinct kind. They do prove however that God has placed a wonderful potential for adaptation and variation within his creation. Macro evolution is speculation believed by those who have a vivid imagination and undying faith in Darwin and his stories.
4 posted on 05/31/2002 6:21:40 AM PDT by Raymond Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Raymond Hendrix
Is it not possible that evolution is God's way of working his wonders?
5 posted on 05/31/2002 6:58:38 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl
Posted here as well.
6 posted on 05/31/2002 7:32:51 AM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
sorry about that. thanks
7 posted on 05/31/2002 8:06:36 AM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer
No, it is not possible for God to use evolution to work his wonders. If it were, then there would be no need for God in the evolutionary equation.

Further, the Genesis account is irreconcilable with evolution as a creative force. Fish and fowl were created on day 5. Land animals and man were created on day 6. Death did not enter into creation until Adam and Eve sinned. The day/age theorists conveniently overlook this part of the creation/fall account. Since death did not occur during day/age 5 and day/age 6, accordingly, the "creative force" death need play (survival of the fittest) would be unavailable.

8 posted on 05/31/2002 1:28:58 PM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting
bttt
9 posted on 05/31/2002 11:57:13 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting
Glad you cleared that up for me, now I know exactly how it happened. Now tell me again about how Eve talked Adam into eating the apple.
10 posted on 06/01/2002 6:17:24 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting
No, it is not possible for God to use evolution to work his wonders. If it were, then there would be no need for God in the evolutionary equation.

I think that's like saying it's not possible for God to use gravity; if there were, there'd be no need for God. Or the same for adaptation and mutation.

Science can only describe the "how" in terms of materiality. It doesn't , and can't, address the larger "why".

11 posted on 06/01/2002 11:37:35 AM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson