1 posted on
08/20/2023 7:48:18 AM PDT by
bitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...
2 posted on
08/20/2023 7:48:33 AM PDT by
bitt
(<img src=' 'width=40%>)
To: bitt
Competing in the Crashed & Burned category, too bad.
3 posted on
08/20/2023 7:49:55 AM PDT by
drSteve78
(Je suis Deplorable. Even more so)
To: bitt
If it was easy Niger would be doing it.
4 posted on
08/20/2023 7:50:33 AM PDT by
null and void
(It's 10 o'clock, does the president know where he is?)
To: bitt
At least they have the capability for it. But will they learn from it and have another go at it?
They're kind of distracted in Ukraine right now.
To: bitt
7 posted on
08/20/2023 7:53:51 AM PDT by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: bitt
Why can’t these writers use the word crash?
9 posted on
08/20/2023 7:56:31 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(I pledge allegiance to the flag of the USofA & to the Constitutional REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
To: bitt
Which was the one 45 years ago?
To: bitt
First defeated by Ukraine. Now defeated by the Moon.
To: bitt
Just like Luna 15 in July 1969. I believe there was something else happening on the moon at that time. 😏
14 posted on
08/20/2023 8:05:26 AM PDT by
Allegra
(Stop the Zeepers from Censoring FReepers)
To: bitt
For a first try in 47 years, it made it to the moon. Its a success that it didn’t blow-up upon launch.
This is totally normal in the process of space exploration. Look at the failures of the Atlas program.
More recently, Space-X’s first rocket was the Falcon 1. Its first three launches were failures, followed by two successes. Then Falcon 9 became the workhorse rocket for a decade, with just two failures in 232 launches, for very high success rate of 99 percent
Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin is behind Space-X in commercial development, but they are similar.
The Russians realize they need to get their @sses in gear, because its once again obvious - free-market development and competition in the USA is pushing space-launch technology and scale in ways they and China simply can not compete with.
16 posted on
08/20/2023 8:07:39 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: bitt
20 posted on
08/20/2023 8:18:31 AM PDT by
roving
(👌⚓Listless Vessel)
To: bitt
So, this is the latest spam story from the neocon nimrods? Focusing on this rather than the fact this country is turning into a totalitarian hellhole under Biden and the fact that Ukraine is failing miserably in its proxy war against Russia?
21 posted on
08/20/2023 8:25:04 AM PDT by
Kazan
To: bitt
22 posted on
08/20/2023 8:26:38 AM PDT by
jdt1138
(Where ever you go, there you are.)
To: bitt
Ukes claim credit for defeating Ruzzian attack on Moon.
23 posted on
08/20/2023 8:27:17 AM PDT by
bigbob
(Q)
To: bitt
Now try landing on the moon using slide rules instead of super computers.
27 posted on
08/20/2023 8:40:04 AM PDT by
Bubba_Leroy
( Dementia Joe is Not My President)
To: bitt
32 posted on
08/20/2023 8:51:17 AM PDT by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
To: bitt
To: bitt
How many more times this story gong to be posted?
51 posted on
08/20/2023 9:42:54 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
To: bitt
At least they tried. Where is the U.S. on the moon?
52 posted on
08/20/2023 9:51:29 AM PDT by
Reno89519
(DeSantis 2024. Successful Governor, Honorable Veteran, Respectful, Respected.)
To: bitt
They meant to do that
Again
60 posted on
08/20/2023 10:24:57 AM PDT by
NWFree
(Sigma male 🤪)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
