This is what happens when you install judges who make up their own law based on their own personal agenda.
Retards saying the second amendment is for self defense. God save us from these fools.
Then why do police and secret service agents carry them?
He will eventually get his ass handed to him.
This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Obama judges .
Recall when Harry Reid expanded the DC circuit for a sea of Obama Radical left wing Black DC judges .
He’s right. The authors of the constitution/founders wanted common people to have far less effective weapons than the military and militias.
Oh wait...
Idiot judge.
Another clueless, black-robed, pampered asshole.
Poor fit ?
If you live in Chicago !
There, you need BIGGER capacity magazines.
/\
Commie infiltrator judge.
“LCMs fall outside of the scope of the amendment because they’re a “poor fit” for self-defense purposes.”
So a 17 round magazine in a SA Hellcat is a “poor fit for self defense purposes”?
LCMs fall outside of the scope of the amendment because they’re a “poor fit” for self-defense purposes.
This judge knows precisely that this decision runs counter to Supreme Court precedent. The tactic of the left now is to simply ignore the Supreme Court and gum up the works for years in as many jurisdictions they can until they get a Supreme Court willing to overturn Bruen, Heller, etc.
poor fit?
That would depend on who you are defending yourself from and what weapons they possess and how many attackers there are.
Saying my magazine is a “poor fit” for self-defense purposes assumes that the judge has an impossible foresight into who will attack me in the future and. how they will be armed.
If this judge knows these things for every citizen in the US he should let us know.
I declare the judge a dumbass !
This is so wacky judge, what they call large capacity magazines varies from firearm to firearm it’s not a universal standard
Where does this idiot judge get the concept that arms are limited to self defense when the 2nd amendment reads:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
One might take it to mean that people should be free to have arms to contribute to the Militia...in which case the weapons would be for war.
One might take it to mean that since the federal government will have a militia that the people have a right to arm themselves as well. Which would mean the weapons were to deter the government from using the militia against the people, so arms would mean those for a civil war.
Under no circumstances is there a suggestion in the Second Amendment that "arms" only means arms intended for private self defense.
This WILL be overturned. This is absolutely not consistent with either Heller or Bruen…and any District Court is inferior to the USSC - FAR inferior. Self-defense and the suitability of any arm for it is irrelevant when the RIGHT to keep arms is at issue.