Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This needs to be overturned immediately. Unfortunately, it will take months, if not years for it to make its way to SCOTUS and who knows what the make-up of the Court may be by then.
1 posted on 04/20/2023 3:09:56 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: CFW

This is what happens when you install judges who make up their own law based on their own personal agenda.


2 posted on 04/20/2023 3:12:10 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Retards saying the second amendment is for self defense. God save us from these fools.


3 posted on 04/20/2023 3:12:20 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
“they're a “poor fit” for self-defense purposes.”

Then why do police and secret service agents carry them?

4 posted on 04/20/2023 3:12:23 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

He will eventually get his ass handed to him.


5 posted on 04/20/2023 3:12:58 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW; mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; umgud; ...

RKBA Ping List


This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.

More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.

7 posted on 04/20/2023 3:14:07 PM PDT by PROCON (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Obama judges .
Recall when Harry Reid expanded the DC circuit for a sea of Obama Radical left wing Black DC judges .


8 posted on 04/20/2023 3:14:10 PM PDT by ncalburt ( Gop DC Globalists are the evil )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

He’s right. The authors of the constitution/founders wanted common people to have far less effective weapons than the military and militias.

Oh wait...


10 posted on 04/20/2023 3:16:10 PM PDT by AAABEST ( NY/DC/CA media/political/military industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
Anyone have an inkling as to how many gun and magazine ban lawsuits have be brought before various courts in say the last 5-10 years?

The left keeps reminding us that they’re not really coming after our guns but they sure do like to being lawsuits that are designed to do just that.
11 posted on 04/20/2023 3:16:26 PM PDT by The Louiswu (You cannot free a man from the chains which he reveres.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Idiot judge.


12 posted on 04/20/2023 3:17:59 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Another clueless, black-robed, pampered asshole.


14 posted on 04/20/2023 3:20:13 PM PDT by tomkat (SOTU = FUBAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
ruling that while magazines in general are “arms” protected by the Second Amendment, LCMs fall outside of the scope of the amendment because they’re a “poor fit” for self-defense purposes.

The Second Amendment doesn't mention self-defense.
15 posted on 04/20/2023 3:20:18 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Poor fit ?

If you live in Chicago !

There, you need BIGGER capacity magazines.

/\

Commie infiltrator judge.


16 posted on 04/20/2023 3:21:57 PM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

“LCMs fall outside of the scope of the amendment because they’re a “poor fit” for self-defense purposes.”

So a 17 round magazine in a SA Hellcat is a “poor fit for self defense purposes”?


17 posted on 04/20/2023 3:22:16 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (It's science and therefore cannot be questioned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

LCMs fall outside of the scope of the amendment because they’re a “poor fit” for self-defense purposes.


Disregarding the fact that the 2nd Amendment wasn’t written solely for ‘self-defense purposes, there’s a story today about a home invasion involving four intruders. Might be nice to have a few extra rounds.


19 posted on 04/20/2023 3:23:20 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

This judge knows precisely that this decision runs counter to Supreme Court precedent. The tactic of the left now is to simply ignore the Supreme Court and gum up the works for years in as many jurisdictions they can until they get a Supreme Court willing to overturn Bruen, Heller, etc.


21 posted on 04/20/2023 3:23:49 PM PDT by The Unknown Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
LCMs fall outside of the scope of the amendment because they’re a “poor fit” for self-defense purposes.

poor fit?

That would depend on who you are defending yourself from and what weapons they possess and how many attackers there are.

Saying my magazine is a “poor fit” for self-defense purposes assumes that the judge has an impossible foresight into who will attack me in the future and. how they will be armed.

If this judge knows these things for every citizen in the US he should let us know.

25 posted on 04/20/2023 3:29:42 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

I declare the judge a dumbass !


26 posted on 04/20/2023 3:31:27 PM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

This is so wacky judge, what they call large capacity magazines varies from firearm to firearm it’s not a universal standard


28 posted on 04/20/2023 3:34:05 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
LCMs fall outside of the scope of the amendment because they’re a “poor fit” for self-defense purposes.

Where does this idiot judge get the concept that arms are limited to self defense when the 2nd amendment reads:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

One might take it to mean that people should be free to have arms to contribute to the Militia...in which case the weapons would be for war.

One might take it to mean that since the federal government will have a militia that the people have a right to arm themselves as well. Which would mean the weapons were to deter the government from using the militia against the people, so arms would mean those for a civil war.

Under no circumstances is there a suggestion in the Second Amendment that "arms" only means arms intended for private self defense.

31 posted on 04/20/2023 3:41:35 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

This WILL be overturned. This is absolutely not consistent with either Heller or Bruen…and any District Court is inferior to the USSC - FAR inferior. Self-defense and the suitability of any arm for it is irrelevant when the RIGHT to keep arms is at issue.


32 posted on 04/20/2023 3:42:28 PM PDT by Ancesthntr (“The right to buy weapons is the right to be free.” ― A.E. Van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson