Posted on 11/02/2020 3:09:50 PM PST by aimhigh
There were 54.6 million more days of poor mental health among adults in states that voted for Hillary Clinton in December 2016, compared to October 2016, according to a study published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine. No such increase in poor mental health following the 2016 US election was observed in states that voted for Donald Trump. The increase in average number of poor mental health days per person in Clinton-voting states largely persisted in the six months after the election.
Comparing states in which Trump had received the most votes with states in which Clinton had received the most votes, a team of researchers from the University of California, San Francisco, USA, and Duke University, Durham, NC, USA found that in Clinton-voting states, the average number of days on which adults reported experiencing poor mental health in the last 30 days increased by 0.50 days, from 3.35 days in October to 3.85 days in December 2016.
Brandon Yan, the corresponding author said: "The additional half a day per adult translated into 54.6 million more days of poor mental health in December 2016 alone for the 109.2 million adults living in Clinton-voting states."
The rise in poor mental health days in Clinton-voting states in December 2016 was primarily observed in adults aged 65 and older, women, and white individuals. No changes in poor mental health days were statistically detected among younger age groups, men, or racial and ethnic minority groups in December 2016 in either Clinton- or Trump-voting states.
In states that voted for Clinton, the authors also observed a 2 percentage point increase in the number of people who reported at least 14 days of poor mental health in the last 30 days in December 2016, compared to October 2016, while no such rise was observed in Trump-voting states.
Brandon Yan said: "It is notable that following the election the proportion of those with 14 or more days of poor mental health also increased, which may suggest that some individuals may newly meet diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder."
The authors analyzed data on 499,201 adults collected in 2016 and 2017 as part of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a joint state and federal annual household survey. By comparing each monthly cohort of survey respondents, they studied changes in three mental health indicators - total days of poor mental health in the last 30 days, 14 days or more of poor mental health in the last 30 days and being diagnosed with a depressive disorder - in Clinton- and Trump-voting states in the six months following the November 2016 election, compared to the six months before the election.
The authors also found that a 10-percentage point higher margin of victory for Trump in the state was associated with 0.41 fewer days of poor mental health in Trump-voting states. The inverse is also statistically true. In Clinton-states, a 10-percentage point higher margin of victory for Clinton in the state predicted 0.41 more days of poor mental health.
Overall, the findings suggest that the outcome of the 2016 election had a negative impact on mental health for voters of the candidate that lost the election. Brandon Yan said: "Depression rates - which were assessed by asking people if they had ever been diagnosed with a depressive disorder - also started rising in January 2017 in Clinton-voting states and in February 2017 in Trump-voting states. These increases in depression rates continued into the second quarter of 2017." The authors suggest that the rise in depression rates in Trump states suggests that there were likely other coinciding factors contributing to depression, such as rising opioid deaths which especially affected many states that voted for Trump.
The authors caution that the cross-sectional observational nature of the study does not allow for conclusions about cause and effect. Because the respondents' candidate preference and party affiliation were unknown, the authors relied on the candidate's margin of victory or loss in a state to assess which candidate's voters experienced changes in mental health.
Brandon Yan said: "Given our findings for 2016, primary care providers, mental health professionals, and the public should not overlook the potential effects from the 2020 election. Health care providers could play a proactive role in monitoring for clinically relevant signs of mental health deterioration and offering appropriate support and intervention following the 2020 election."
They voted for Pickles Clinton...how much poorer could their mental health get?
Total whack jobs.
Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is real.
Great quote...and so true.
Spoiled unhappy brats! Well, I marched when I was young... as a member of bands while playing trombone. And I was happy and satisfied! A protest march doesn't make anyone happy.
“Could it be that liberalism is a mental disorder?”
G. K. Chesterton took note of that about a century and a quarter ago.
Their mental state devolved into TDS.
Yeah. I see that too.
The first one I see eating brains gets double tapped
Interesting claim, but sorry, there's no way it could possibly be true. /rimshot
If took them till now to figure out that you’d have to be crazy to vote for Hillary? I had that one pegged by about 1990, and I don’t even claim to be an expert.
Let me see if I can find the clip of Bob Hope asking “Like Democrats?” after learning about zombies.
"Zombies have no will of their own... walking around blindly with dead eyes... following orders, not knowing what they're doing, not caring."
"You mean, like Democrats?"
If Bob Hope were alive today, he'd add:
"And they vandalize, burn, and maim everything in sight while screaming horribly!"
So basically they went nuts for an extra half a day, more nuts than they usually are. Half a day seriesly depressed, and then they went out and started throwing rocks at cars with Trump bumper stickers, and smashing store windows for looting purposes. I feel their pain./s
Great art is timeless.
She has a permanent look of “concern” on her face
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.