Despite Warnings Media Steps on a Rake With “Whistleblower” Story

theconservativetreehouse.com ^ | 9/21/19 | sundance

[a little elbow grease]

Well, well, well… the media cannot say President Trump didn’t try to warn them about throwing fake-news rakes in front of their narrative parade – then wondering why they keep getting black-eyes. Here we go, the details begin to surface.

With more reporting by John Solomon, cited and attributed to on-the-record officials in the State Department and Ukraine, a much more clear picture emerges. In reality, and unfortunately as expected, the fulsome picture is 180° divergent from the media narrative.

The government of Ukraine under both Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, and now President Volodymyr Zelensky, had been trying to deliver information about Obama officials and Democrat party officials (DNC on behalf of Hillary Clinton) requesting the government of Ukraine to interfere in the 2016 election.

Both Poroshenko and Zelensky administrations had tried, unsuccessfully, to get information to current U.S. officials. U.S. State Department officials in Ukraine were refusing to give visa’s to Ukrainian emissaries because they did not want the damaging information sent to the President Trump administration.

Failing to get help from the U.S. State Department, the Ukranians tried a workaround, and hired a respected U.S. lawyer to hand deliver the documentary evidence directly to the U.S. Department of Justice. The contracted American lawyer hand-delivered the information to the U.S. Department of Justice in New York.

[Go Gordon]

LOL ...... or he was too busy contacting his drug dealer.

Or, he was banging his deceased brother's wife.

[my right]

now that right there is funny.

[M Kehoe]

Hi.

Another question, why was the NSA “Whistle blower” listening in on POTUS’s phone calls?

I’ll say it again, on January 21st 2017 the new Trump administration should have gave an “exit interview” to about 10 thousand federal employees in critical positions.

Question: did you vote for Baraq 0bama twice? If yes, you’re FIRED!

Just sayin again...

5.56mm

[Hot Tabasco]

did you vote for Baraq 0bama twice? If yes, you’re FIRED!

Obama voter: NO..........

You're hired!

See how easy that is?......Sheesh!

[a little elbow grease]

"I’ll say it again, on January 21st 2017 the new Trump administration should have gave an “exit interview” to about 10 thousand federal employees"

............................ should have given ............

(sorry - it's just English)

[HotHunt]

".... But people like this old lady, of which I believe there to be many, listen to CNN and MSNBC and run with it...."

I disagree with your premise that there are many people like this old lady who listen to CNN and MSNBC.

Combined, those two network's audience share is at the bottom of the ratings. Meaning, not very many people even tune-in to these two outlets.

So I wouldn't worry about their minuscule audiences throwing the election for the democRATS.

Anybody who watches CNN and MSNBC are liberals to begin with and won't have any affect on the election outcome anymore than they normally would.

What you have is an example of anecdotal evidence but not empirical.