Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House will vote ‘soon’ to hold Barr, Ross in criminal contempt over citizenship question
RollCall ^ | July 8, 2019

Posted on 07/08/2019 5:52:33 PM PDT by SMGFan

Pelosi announces plans for full House vote in dear colleague letter, also outlining legislative steps to protect migrants

The House will “soon” vote to hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary William Ross in contempt of Congress for defying subpoenas for documents explaining the administration’s rationale for wanting to add a citizenship question to the census, Speaker Nancy Pelosi wrote in a “Dear Colleague” letter on Monday.

The Oversight and Reform Committee last month approved a contempt resolution against Barr and Ross that included language to refer the matter to the U.S. attorney in Washington for possible criminal charges, as well as authorize the pursuit of a lawsuit.

The Justice and Commerce departments have provided the Oversight Committee with some documents on the citizenship question while withholding others over claims of executive privilege.

The House, in a floor vote the day before the Oversight contempt markup, already gave all committees the authority to file lawsuits to enforce their subpoenas.

That means a floor vote is not needed for Democrats to try to get a court order forcing Barr and Ross to hand over the outstanding documents they requested.

(Excerpt) Read more at rollcall.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: braking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: SMGFan

Communist circle jerk .. brought to you by voters (incl wetbacks) on the left side of the bell curve.


21 posted on 07/08/2019 6:28:34 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

22 posted on 07/08/2019 6:31:14 PM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

What happened to the democRATS is that the communists from the 1960s counterculture are running the party now.

THink of every idea Charlie Manson, Black Panthers, William Ayers, etc. had they are now putting forward as a legitimate plan.

It’s nuts, but it explains their current mindset.


23 posted on 07/08/2019 6:31:43 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

They are not even thinking in a rationale mind. I and others think they have gone insane.


24 posted on 07/08/2019 6:36:16 PM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
The United States has previously used the 'citizenship' status in question form on previous census questions. The 1820 Census form asked specifically if the person was a "Foreigner not naturalized", meaning a person who was in the country NOT HAVING "CITIZENSHIP" status....

Here is the 820 CENSUS form

25 posted on 07/08/2019 6:47:49 PM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
The United States has previously used the 'citizenship' status in question form on previous census questions. The 1820 Census form asked specifically if the person was a "Foreigner not naturalized", meaning a person who was in the country NOT HAVING "CITIZENSHIP" status....

Here is the 1820 CENSUS form

26 posted on 07/08/2019 6:48:43 PM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek
Furthermore, the 14th amendment to the Constitution requires that only citizens be counted for the purpose of political representation.

Amendment 14 Section 2:

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election... is denied to any of the inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such citizens shall bear to the whole number of citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
The Constitution requires the counting of citizens. Any such reasoning that Barr, Ross, or Trump may have asserted is moot.

By Article VI, this is supreme Law of the Land. Congress, nor the Supreme Court, may overturn Article VI or the 14th amendment requirements.

-PJ

27 posted on 07/08/2019 6:50:43 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Democrats are desperate. They are trying to taint the good name of our President in any way they can. In this case they are trying for headlines to cause people to think negative thoughts about the name of Trump whether he did anything wrong, or not. It’s political harassment.


28 posted on 07/08/2019 6:51:13 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists call 'em what you will they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA
The 1830 Census asked the question....

"ALIENS—Foreigners not naturalized


29 posted on 07/08/2019 6:53:09 PM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
If they're not counted....it's their fault.....not the fault of a question as simple as....citizen...alien...check one.

The Dims will claim that the illegals fear the government would use the census citizenship information to locate and round them up, so many would not participate in the census. But the promise is that census data will not be used for any other purpose and I think the government has always abided by that.

The Dims just want that maximum count of illegals to keep their number of US Reps. and electoral votes as high as possible. But I don't think there is anyone who honestly believes that illegal aliens should count toward a states representation in Congress. It's just another power grab and those that gain from it have no qualms about it.

30 posted on 07/08/2019 6:55:44 PM PDT by Will88 (The only people opposing voter ID are those benefiting from voter fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

The rationale should take 30 seconds. We are correcting Obama’s error by returning the question to the census.


31 posted on 07/08/2019 6:55:44 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (I trust President Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Is their any doubt that Pelosi has committed countless illegal acts during her days. I sure hope that someone holds her accountable.


32 posted on 07/08/2019 6:57:06 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

We really don’t have a government anymore. We have a political mafia.


33 posted on 07/08/2019 6:57:31 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Fun fact, the 1870 census specifically asked whether the mother and father were foreign born.


34 posted on 07/08/2019 6:59:47 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (I trust President Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader
Wait till Congress gets dissolved and charged with treason

please make it so

35 posted on 07/08/2019 7:01:47 PM PDT by SisterK (its a spiritual war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Not A Snowbird

“... the 1870 census specifically asked whether the mother and father were foreign born...”
-
That question does not reveal one’s individual citizenship.


36 posted on 07/08/2019 7:06:22 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

No. The question is why was it removed in the first place.


37 posted on 07/08/2019 7:09:36 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

“...the 14th amendment to the Constitution requires that only citizens be counted...”
-
It says...”counting the whole number of persons in each State”.


38 posted on 07/08/2019 7:09:37 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Of course they will!


39 posted on 07/08/2019 7:22:53 PM PDT by GraceG ("If I post an AWESOME MEME, STEAL IT! JUST RE-POST IT IN TWO PLACES PLEASE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

AND 18 congressional seats.


40 posted on 07/08/2019 7:45:15 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson