Posted on 12/11/2018 11:00:57 PM PST by tom h
the crazy-hot matrix exists for a reason
>>She’s no doubt simultaneously embarrassed by her natural good looks and willing to use them to her advantage. If I am right it won’t take too many years for her outward appearance to reflect her inner attitudes.
Well she could always shave her eyebrows, crop her hair, put plugs in her ears, add a couple of neck tattoos, and get a nose ring like the girls at the coffeeshop.
Class Year: 2021
Anticipated Major: English
Dance background: Assorted styles including Chinese, ballet, contemporary, and modern throughout lower, middle, and high school. Summer dance intensives at Kibbutz Contemporary Dance Company and Batsheva Dance Company.
Favorite dance move: Fish-flops
Fun fact: I am terrible at whistling, but I do it all the time.
And while everyone pi$$ed and moaned about our favorite song rights being violated, the CEO of Google lied through his teeth about violating our civil rights in front of Congress... oh, baby, it’s stupid outside
The human Peppy Le-Pew.
“I’m actually surprised. She isn’t unattractive. Just a Princeton brainwash, most likely”
Yeah, but look at the look on her face. Can’t you imagine her carrying around “the little red book” and turning you into authorities if you don’t have yours with you?
Sad to say, this isn’t even the FIRST time critics have completely missed the target and just unjustly attacked Ariel or her movie. Apparently, critics back in 1989 basically bashed Ariel as being “cloyingly sexist” for even WANTING to go for Eric at all, which led directly to Jeffrey Katzenberg completely rewriting Beauty and the Beast to be, among other things, a feminist screed that’s almost completely divorced from the fairy tale it was based on, and even hired that feminazi hack Linda Woolverton to ensure such a message was pushed.
And yeah, no kidding about how Kiss the Girl is being demonized. For goodness sakes, Ariel outright gave consent to being kissed (actually puckering up in expectation during the song), so the entire premise that she was somehow violated doesn’t even work. Maybe if they complained about Lumiere’s character as an unrepentant womanizer that’s depicted in a positive light, I’d be a bit more inclined to agree there.
"Anchors Aweigh!"
Even fairy tales have a context. And some of them are pretty good parables of Christian concepts.
These “kiss” tales are salvation metaphors.
APparently, SJWs think that mute people should never get to have a relationship, since they can’t give verbal consent.
I guess they’re definitely going to get triggered by one of the Kay Jewelers holiday ads where a man gives a woman (presumed to be his girlfriend, fiancé, or even wife) a necklace and speaking to her via sign language (and she’s implied to be mute since she doesn’t make any sounds at all) a few years back.
Seriously, does the term American Sign Language mean absolutely NOTHING to these guys, or, heck, even nodding or shaking heads as a reply?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.