Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schiff: There is legal precedent for impeaching sitting officials over prior criminal conduct
The Hill ^ | 10/03/18 | OLIVIA BEAVERS

Posted on 10/03/2018 11:47:25 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday said sitting officials can be impeached for prior criminal conduct, citing a recent legal precedent.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) made the remarks after he was asked at a Washington event at the Brookings Institution about whether a sitting president can be prosecuted for federal crimes that he or she committed before taking office.

Schiff pointed to a 2010 case in which the Senate voted to impeach Thomas Porteous Jr., who was a Louisiana federal district court judge at the time.

Schiff said the Senate convicted him on four articles of impeachment — articles he noted would be "relevant to modern times." The counts included one based purely on prior conduct and another for lying under oath during a Senate confirmation.

"On an overwhelming basis, the Senate convicted [him] on all those articles including those two," Schiff said. "We now by constitutional terms — in a country that rarely has impeachment trials — have a precedent that you can be impeached and removed from office both for prior crimes and for lying under oath," the California lawmaker added.

Schiff, who tried the Porteous impeachment case, emphasized that this particular notion of trying a sitting official for past criminal conduct is "not an open question," despite people claiming it is on television talk shows.

"This had me yelling me at the TV set, which I rarely do," he joked.

Porteous became the eighth federal judge to be impeached and removed from office in more than two decades.

The audience member who raised the question pointed to tax crimes as an example of prior conduct, a reference that comes one day after the The New York Times reported that President Trump had participated in "dubious" tax strategies in the 1990s.

The audience member also asked whether it would be possible to prosecute a sitting president for crimes that occurred after he is out of office in the event "he may pardon himself for those crimes."

Benjamin Wittes, co-founder of Brookings' Lawfare Blog, pointed out that many of these questions are contested.

"Whether the president can be indicted at all is a contested question. The application of a self-pardon is a contested question. And whether a president can be made answerable for pre-presidential conduct is itself a contested question," said Wittes, who was moderating the panel.

Despite Schiff's recent comments, Democrats have stayed away from talks of trying to impeach Trump.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has previously warned that Democrats could hurt their party's efforts to win seats during the November midterm elections if they pursue impeachment efforts against Trump.

“I don’t think we should be talking about impeachment. I’ve been very clear right from the start,” Pelosi said in April during a press briefing in the Capitol.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: abortion; adamschiff; botox; brettkavanaugh; california; diannefeinstein; louisiana; maga; nancypelosi; richardcblum; sanfrancisco; sanfrannan; schiff; schiffforbrains; scotus; thomasporteousjr; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: yesthatjallen

41 posted on 10/03/2018 1:15:02 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

If they take out Trump the next person we elect will be their worst nightmare.


42 posted on 10/03/2018 1:18:21 PM PDT by GOPJ ( <img src=”https://i.imgur.com/li3mn5N.jpg";></img>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Awesome! Because you’re next, schiffy!


43 posted on 10/03/2018 1:19:31 PM PDT by sdthree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“This had me yelling me at the TV set, which I rarely do,” he joked.” That’s actually humorous; I yell at the TV and radio virtually every time Schiffhead speaks. I wanna pop that thing at the top of his neck like a pimple.


44 posted on 10/03/2018 1:20:54 PM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

That includes you Mr Schiff for brains. I want to see your bugged out ugly puss behind bars where you belong!


45 posted on 10/03/2018 1:23:00 PM PDT by dforest (Never let a Muslim cut your hair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Schiff for brains.

5.56mm


46 posted on 10/03/2018 1:32:14 PM PDT by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Let’s start with you & The Standard Hotel, Schiff.


47 posted on 10/03/2018 2:00:38 PM PDT by stylecouncilor (Dreg of Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Let’s start with you.


48 posted on 10/03/2018 3:28:38 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson