Posted on 10/03/2018 11:47:25 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
The House can impeach a ham sandwich. Convicting an impeached person in a Senate trial with 60 Republicans is a different story.
he wasn’t asked about impeachment...
This guy is the dictionary definition of a “dipshit.”
They could impeach Trump but the Senate will never convict him.
This is really a bone tossed to their lunatic base for their failure to derail Kavanaugh.
Supposedly they can’t wait to even the score with Trump but the polls tell a different story.
Fine. Start with the House and Senate, eh?
Tucker Carlson SHREDS Adam Schiff On Russian Election Hack (View from the Left) [LANGUAGE]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAq9hgTLAZ8
Yes they can. They can construe overdue library books as a high crime or misdemeanor and proceed to impeachment. But, impeachment is the only way to remove a sitting President, so Adam needs to get busy convincing his fellow members of the House to bring impeachment charges. I think that Adam Schiff will be indicted first.
OLIVIA BEAVERS
- -
Sorry. Can’t take article seriously.
Si using the same tactics we look into the affairs of all the leadinh dems till we find something, then start impeachment proceeding
Well, I hate to say it, but he does have a point. Sitting Presidents can’t be indicted while in office, even for a crime they might have committed before taking office. The Constitutional remedy is to impeach and remove them, then they could be prosecuted.
If we could not impeach a President for crimes that happened before they took office, a President would be able to avoid justice in that situation, as there would be no remedy at all. They could possibly even escape prosecution altogether if the statute of limitations ran out before they left office.
That repulsive Schiff creep needs held down and slapped into unconsciousness.
Not that many would notice any difference . . .
The Dems are all looney like Dr. Fraud.
He’s just jealous Spartacus and Feinstein are getting all the attention. Cut into his CNN and MSNBC facetime.
Needs to get relevant again.
Obviously never heard of the first rule of holes
So, uh, Adam...being as how you went to school ‘bout the same time, wanna tell us about any chemical substances you mighta sampled at some of your parties?
Oh right. You were pure as the driven snow.
Gotit.
Schitt head needs to be careful here. There’s also precedent for challenging offensive members of Congress, etc. challenging to a duel.
It must be hard to have Schiff for brains.
So, does Schiff for brains plan to introduce impeachment articles against Justice Breyer for his under age drinking arrest while at Stanford?
All these holier than thou leftists should have to provide an answer to the question of Breyer’s youthful disregard for the law. How can such a person be allowed to sit in judgment on the highest court in the land?
What federal crimes, dipschiff?
Tax evasion on his own taxes? That’d be a neat trick, as the IRS audits him every year, and if there was tax evasion they’d have found it by now.
Tax evasion on his father’s Gift Tax Returns? Well, Fred Trump wasn’t a federal official, and I have it on good word that he simply isn’t going to testify. DJT isn’t responsible for what is on his father’s returns. Oh, and even if there was a material fraud on the father’s Estate Tax Return, and DJT was the Executor responsible for filing them, the statute of limitations expired after 6 years. Besides, THAT return was also audited, and the IRS had no issues with it.
Schiff-fer-brains should take Mazie Hirono’s advice and just shut up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.