Posted on 02/10/2018 2:08:57 PM PST by jazusamo
I’m not so sure — if the proposition created the loophole they have to live with it. That’s the conservative thing.
In keeping with the Delusional Lying Leftist doctrine of Luciferianism and its agenda of sexual perversion to facilitate global totalitarian government.
http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/12/top-insider-exposes-luciferian-origin-of-globalist-empire/
Sometimes voters’ referenda are like “Give us Barabbas”... manipulated.
If that’s the case then Moonbeam Brown best get busy and make his promise good, not holding breath.
How could a gaffe that large, if it was a gaffe, escape the normal campaign and anti-campaign activity around that proposition.
Keeping in mind that in this schizophrenic age, what counts as “sex offense” could be some indiscreet peeing behind a bush.
According to this ruling, in Californicate-ia, “raping a drugged or unconscious victim and intimately touching someone who is unlawfully restrained” are not violent crimes.
In her defense of the rapist she got free, Hillary argued much the same things.
But in California, if you use ‘him’ when he wants to be called ‘her’ and they want you to be put in prison.
If you have than many sex offenders,
maybe you should legalize and tax it.
Sacramento needs the money.
Support Free Republic, Folks!
Because California is run by the Democrat Party. And the Democrats never consider themselves to be constrained by the law.
As far as the Democrat Party is concerned, laws only when s d how The Party decides they will.
She is doing the opposite she is reading the relevant legislation as it is currently understood by Statute. That is one reason laws by petition and balloting are not always a good idea. They are often not written to clearly establish intent. When that happens a judge must go by existing statutes including definitions.
Or an 18 year old and a 17 year old fogging up a car. We're due for a re-think on some of this.
GA already paroles SOs. And murderers.
Up and at ‘em.
The Democrats need the sex offender vote.
It’s another devil-in-the-details situation.
As it is, they said nonviolent gets the easy treatment. Rapes and molestations are violent. I don’t know if porn production counts here. Some flashers will skate.
If “looking” conservative and BEING conservative are at odds, we should take the latter.
That must be pretty tight if 10,000 for all California suffices.
How is rape not forcible if the victim is drugged unconscious or unlawfully restrained? Apparently it is still a RAPE charge, but not rape rape?
“.......What makes things even more convoluted: when Gov. Jerry Brown campaigned for this initiative, he promised voters all sex offenders would be excluded from being considered for early parole if Proposition 57 passed......”
Jerry Brown did what comes naturally for a Democrat, he lied.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.