Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge's Ruling May Give Roughly 10,000 Sex Offenders Early Parole
Townhall.com ^ | February 10, 2018 | Beth Baumann

Posted on 02/10/2018 2:08:57 PM PST by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Another judge legislating from the bench, this one in California.
1 posted on 02/10/2018 2:08:58 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I’m not so sure — if the proposition created the loophole they have to live with it. That’s the conservative thing.


2 posted on 02/10/2018 2:12:20 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

In keeping with the Delusional Lying Leftist doctrine of Luciferianism and its agenda of sexual perversion to facilitate global totalitarian government.

http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/12/top-insider-exposes-luciferian-origin-of-globalist-empire/


3 posted on 02/10/2018 2:16:30 PM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Sometimes voters’ referenda are like “Give us Barabbas”... manipulated.


4 posted on 02/10/2018 2:16:35 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

If that’s the case then Moonbeam Brown best get busy and make his promise good, not holding breath.


5 posted on 02/10/2018 2:17:11 PM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

How could a gaffe that large, if it was a gaffe, escape the normal campaign and anti-campaign activity around that proposition.

Keeping in mind that in this schizophrenic age, what counts as “sex offense” could be some indiscreet peeing behind a bush.


6 posted on 02/10/2018 2:19:47 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

According to this ruling, in Californicate-ia, “raping a drugged or unconscious victim and intimately touching someone who is unlawfully restrained” are not violent crimes.

In her defense of the rapist she got free, Hillary argued much the same things.


7 posted on 02/10/2018 2:22:55 PM PST by Strac6 ("Mrs. Strac, Pilatus, and Sig Sauer: All the fun things in my life are Swiss!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

But in California, if you use ‘him’ when he wants to be called ‘her’ and they want you to be put in prison.


8 posted on 02/10/2018 2:23:21 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If you have than many sex offenders,
maybe you should legalize and tax it.
Sacramento needs the money.


9 posted on 02/10/2018 2:23:46 PM PST by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

MAGA!

Support Free Republic, Folks!

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

10 posted on 02/10/2018 2:27:52 PM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Because California is run by the Democrat Party. And the Democrats never consider themselves to be constrained by the law.

As far as the Democrat Party is concerned, laws only when s d how The Party decides they will.


11 posted on 02/10/2018 2:31:01 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

She is doing the opposite she is reading the relevant legislation as it is currently understood by Statute. That is one reason laws by petition and balloting are not always a good idea. They are often not written to clearly establish intent. When that happens a judge must go by existing statutes including definitions.


12 posted on 02/10/2018 2:31:03 PM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Keeping in mind that in this schizophrenic age, what counts as “sex offense” could be some indiscreet peeing behind a bush.

Or an 18 year old and a 17 year old fogging up a car. We're due for a re-think on some of this.

13 posted on 02/10/2018 2:31:53 PM PST by Poison Pill (Arch Heretic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

GA already paroles SOs. And murderers.


14 posted on 02/10/2018 2:33:22 PM PST by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Up and at ‘em.


15 posted on 02/10/2018 2:33:27 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Democrats need the sex offender vote.


16 posted on 02/10/2018 2:36:01 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

It’s another devil-in-the-details situation.

As it is, they said nonviolent gets the easy treatment. Rapes and molestations are violent. I don’t know if porn production counts here. Some flashers will skate.

If “looking” conservative and BEING conservative are at odds, we should take the latter.


17 posted on 02/10/2018 2:36:04 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

That must be pretty tight if 10,000 for all California suffices.


18 posted on 02/10/2018 2:36:39 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

How is rape not forcible if the victim is drugged unconscious or unlawfully restrained? Apparently it is still a RAPE charge, but not rape rape?


19 posted on 02/10/2018 2:39:09 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Ask a lib if Alger Hiss colluded with the Russians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“.......What makes things even more convoluted: when Gov. Jerry Brown campaigned for this initiative, he promised voters all sex offenders would be excluded from being considered for early parole if Proposition 57 passed......”

Jerry Brown did what comes naturally for a Democrat, he lied.


20 posted on 02/10/2018 2:39:52 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Conservatives seek the truth. Democrats seek the power to dictate what truth is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson