The Media That Cried Wolf

American Thinker.com ^ | November 15, 2017 | Tom Trinko

[Kaslin]

In a week in which CNN cried wolf when there was no wolf by falsely condemning Trump for poor fish-feeding habits, is it surprising that decades-old charges of sexual impropriety being leveled against Judge Roy Moore aren’t being unquestioningly accepted by voters?

We can all remember a number of times when the media has proclaimed a wolf was present when we later discovered they were wrong.

There is Global Warming… err, Climate Change where we were told that by now the world would be doomed but somehow that hasn’t happened.

We were told that the black man shot in Ferguson was holding his hands up to surrender.

In the last century the media informed us that overpopulation would lead to mass starvation. Of course, that was bogus.

We were told that many women had been assaulted by Trump but the fact that they all apparently disappeared after the election makes reasonable people wonder if there was a wolf.

The media can’t stop talking about Russian colluding with Trump even though after months and months of investigation absolutely nothing has been found.

Clearly a reasonable person would hesitate before assuming that salacious charges raised weeks before a contentious election by a highly biased news source is true. The media has cried wolf so often when there was no wolf that sane people reserve judgement until there’s more proof.

That attitude is exacerbated by the fact that when wolves do appear the media often fails to mention them.

We know that none of the major networks have mentioned the fact that for more than two months a Democratic senator has been on trial for accepting bribes.

We know that the media ignored a credible claim that Bill Clinton raped a woman.

[Yosemitest]

Here's an excerpt from Rush Limbaugh's Radio Show:

The Swamp Demands Conformity
Nov 15, 2017

...
RUSH: Here’s Mark in Port Townsend — where’s Port Townsend ?
Port Townsend what?

CALLER: That’s a little bit west of Seattle.

RUSH: In Washington.
Okay. Great to have you with us.
How you doing, sir ?

CALLER: I’m doing great, sir.
I hope you’re doing well yourself.

RUSH: I am under siege today, Mark.
I’m under siege.
The Drive-By Media is after me because I dared to point out that Roy Moore used to be a Democrat.

CALLER: That’s why you get paid the big bucks.
I’m envious of you.

RUSH: (laughing).

CALLER: So the comment I wanted to make was that as a retired law enforcement officer, Jeff Sessions —
I’m speaking as a retired law enforcement officer
— Jeff Sessions says he doesn’t see any reason to doubt these girls’ word.
Well, I see a really good reason.
None of these girls have been put under oath and made a sworn statement under penalty of perjury.
And Gloria Allred should be able to tell you
that is the first thing you do when you get a client,
you depose them and you get their statement on the record,
and then you go from there.
And if they’re not willing to make a sworn statement, that sounds really fishy to me.

RUSH: I take it you don’t believe the women
or you just don’t have enough information yet to make a determination ?

CALLER: You don’t have enough information to make a determination,
but speaking as an ex-cop, I find it fishy that nobody has made a sworn statement.
And about that yearbook thing,
you know, when I was in uniform at a certain time of year
you’d get kids walking up to you all the time wanting you to sign their yearbook.
“Hey, Officer Mark, sign my yearbook.”
And I was only a cop.
Can you imagine how politicians get kids wanting —
doesn’t mean you remember all of them.

RUSH: Hang on.
On the yearbook stuff, folks, for those of you who may not be up to speed on this —
and I doubt there are very many of you
— there are allegations that some of these autographs in yearbooks are forged.
There are conservative blog sites claiming to have evidence by virtue of side-by-side comparison
that somebody other than Judge Moore signed some of these things.
This is the first I’ve mentioned that.
I’m just reacting to you bringing up the yearbooks.

You’re upset with Jeff Sessions.
He’s the attorney general, and he is going ahead and acknowledging that
he believes witnesses before anybody’s been put under oath,
and you think that’s a little unprofessional, right ?

CALLER: It sounds to me like he’s just trying to tread carefully.

RUSH: Well, look, this is politics.
It has its own court, and it’s not a court of law.

CALLER: But these girls are making public statements —

RUSH: They are women.
They are women.

CALLER: Okay, they’re making public statements impugning somebody’s honor.
And somebody with responsibility needs to explain to them,
if you’re gonna besmirch somebody, you gotta put it on the record.

RUSH: No, you don’t.
Only in court.
And this is not in court.
This is in politics.

CALLER: I understand it’s politics,
but Gloria Allred should know what the law is.

RUSH: I’m sure she does.
That’s why she’s not in court and is instead on TV.

CALLER: I just want to make that point, Rush.
Thank you.

RUSH: I’m glad you called, Mark.
Folks, I have to tell you,
I’m having a little fun with this.
No, don’t misunderstand here,
but he’s exactly right, but of course that doesn’t —
there’s a whole different inertia and movement now that is taking place in the world of politics,
and there is no room for doubt.
I mean,
the guy did it, you don’t disbelieve the women.
I mean, that’s something you must subscribe to now.
The women don’t lie,
except if you’re Juanita Broaddrick,
then of course…
that’s the point.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I was having fun with the caller and his obvious consternation
by confusing what happens in politics with what happens in the law,which is ironic,
because the laws are written by these people.
But what happens there
apparently the law doesn’t matter first and foremost.
Find it funny.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Steve in Rochester, Minnesota.
Great to have you with us, sir.
How are you ?

CALLER: Hey, good.
Thanks, Rush. Dittos.
I’ve been listening since 1991.
So I was reading through a Fox News story on the various senators,
Republican senators and their comments about this whole situation,
and I read read ’em one after another; there were many.
And I was thinking as I got most of the way through it,
this sounds a lot like your media montages, vis-a-vis gravitas,
that I often hear on your show.
The similarities were striking in what they said.
And it was an observation that led me to think that
this is really a coordinated attack.
And I think that should be the focus, not the “he said, she said,”
but the fact that
this guy’s being attacked by the establishment, big time.

RUSH: Let me put it to you another way in the form of a question.
Interesting observation, by the way, that you,
in reading and listening to all of the different people opposing Judge Moore,
they’re all saying the same thing, is that your point ?
Just like when Cheney was mentioned as the potential vice presidential nominee for George W. Bush,
about 85 media people all said,
“That’s gravitas.
This is to provide gravitas.”
They all had that word.
You think the same thing’s happening here with the response to Judge Moore ?

CALLER: Yes.
Exactly.

RUSH: Okay.
So do you think —
let me just ask you point-blank
— do you think that, whether he did it or not, he’s being railroaded ?

CALLER: Yes.

RUSH: Interesting.

CALLER: Yep. I think this is a coordinated attack,
and what spurred me to think this
was your comments yesterday about Mitch McConnell attacking Bannon’s choice.
And I thought
how else could you do this ?
Here we are a month away from the election.

RUSH: Let me tell you something.
I don’t think there’s any doubt here.
When Bannon went public and said that
Judge Moore was the first of many candidates they’re gonna support
in order to oust the Republican leadership,
I don’t think there’s any question here that McConnell’s reacting to that.

Let me just ask you this.
Have any of you ever,
do you ever remember Mitch McConnell or the Republican leadership ever going after a Democrat
the way they’re going after — (interruption)
You don’t remember.
You don’t remember McConnell ever going after a Democrat the way they’re going after …

[Elsie]

The media can’t stop talking about Russian colluding with Trump even though after months and months of investigation absolutely nothing has been found.

 

 

 

" The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success

unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly -

- it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over."

[Elsie]

Too many instances of "mistaken" can only be lying.

Or such poor research that indicates a lack of care about accuracy.

[Elsie]

The Drive-By Media is after me because I dared to point out that Roy Moore used to be a Democrat.

Then they'll 'get after' WIKI as well...

[Elsie]

Then they'll 'get after' WIKI as well...

from Wiki...

Political party	Republican (1992–present)
Other political affiliations	Democratic (before 1992)

 

[COBOL2Java]

Or such poor research that indicates a lack of care about accuracy.

Yep, those oh-so-much-smarter-than-us UniParty bastards assume that those dumb hayseeds from Alabama are stupid enough to fall for their tricks, so why be careful?

Please note: I do not mean the preceding in any derogatory way toward the good people of Alabama; it's only meant to show what they think of you and, by extension, me.

[exDemMom]

Here’s another analysis of Judge Moore’s real signature compared to the fake:

http://cowgernation.com/2017/11/14/vindicated-signature-forged-12-discrepancies-roy-moores-alleged-yearbook-signature/

Sorry I can only post the link; I’d post the pictures but don’t have time to figure out the picture links and put them into the html.

[Yosemitest]

That'z a great link that everyone should read.

[Yosemitest]

I recommend

HTML Sandbox 2008

and A guide to using HTML on Free Republic in 5 lines

Also, you can 'right-mouse click' my comment above, and then click "View Source", and look for that comment number, and see how to do it.
Or you can do that to any document or internet page, and then copy and paste from it, what you want to use.

[Wife of D28Man]

Why, if you’ve already written “Christmas 1977” above your signature, would you write 12-22-1977 below it?

[Yosemitest]

Don't ask me.
Ask the forger.

[exDemMom]

Thank you.

I can always google html codes for posting pics, and I often do. But if I can’t find the actual link for the picture, I can’t post it.

Thank you for finding the picture link and just posting the picture.

A single side-by-side comparison doesn’t actually prove or disprove a forgery, because people’s signatures are variable. But if you can compare the suspected forgery against several verified samples of the real signature, then certain elements of the signature become apparent. For example, it appears that Roy Moore loves to embellish the “y”—and the embellishment is completely absent from the forgery, as is the little hook at the end of the “M” that he likes to add. The rest of the suspected forgery is so different from the handwriting in Judge Moore’s signature that my impression is that someone else wrote it, and Roy Moore’s signature was added as an afterthought, probably within the last week.

[Texas Songwriter]

The dems are beginning the drumbeat that, "Perhaps we should seize on redemption. This began as dems began to stackup as sexual perverts.. They don't give a flip about redemption. What they are trying to create is a backdoor to escape their perversion. They remain unchanged in their heart. They are trying to simonize and make all dems a means of a 2n, 3rd, 4th chances. The media (demonstrated) they apply a different standard to Moore.

I am so glad I was able to help the dems pay a 15.1 million dollar payoff for assaulting women.. Of course the media knew that story. They were protecting their sources.

We need to clean out the whole rats nest....all of them

[Texas Songwriter]

The dems are beginning the drumbeat that, "Perhaps we should seize on redemption. This began as dems began to stackup as sexual perverts.. They don't give a flip about redemption. What they are trying to create is a backdoor to escape their perversion. They remain unchanged in their heart. They are trying to simonize and make all dems a means of a 2n, 3rd, 4th chances. The media (demonstrated) they apply a different standard to Moore.

I am so glad I was able to help the dems pay a 15.1 million dollar payoff for assaulting women.. Of course the media knew that story. They were protecting their sources.

We need to clean out the whole rats nest....all of them

[Yosemitest]

Learn how to use the 'right-mouse click' and its options.
Learn how to quickly scan "Source Page Data" to find what you're looking for, to "copy and paste" that data onto a notepad, so you can save it and use it later.