Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Should Pay for Damage Associated With Climate Change – and Who Should Be Compensated?
Futurism ^ | September 21, 2017 | by June Javelosa

Posted on 09/22/2017 10:24:52 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Hurricanes in the Caribbean and deadly floods across South Asia have once again raised the issue of climate justice.

The association between such events and climate change is now beyond serious question: we have had 30 years of well-founded scientific warnings about the relationship between increasing global temperatures and the incidence and severity of extreme weather. Much more problematic is the question of responsibility for climate change itself, and who should justly pay compensation for the resulting damage.

Responsibility for global warming was usually framed as an obligation for developed states to make the initial moves to reduce their emissions, under the concept of “common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities”. Climate justice was seen as something developed states owed less developed states, and were obliged to deliver so the latter had an incentive to cut their emissions, too.

True climate justice will have to reorientate the debate away from state sovereignty and international standing towards a focus on personal harm. A system of individual carbon accounting would also help so that people make a contribution to poverty reduction and disaster relief appropriate to their wealth and lifestyle.

As hurricanes engulf numerous countries at once, and indirectly affect even more, climate change powerfully illustrates the need for creative thinking about a truly global cosmopolitanism in which the avoidance of human suffering comes before self-interest and it is recognised that there are many poor and vulnerable people in “rich countries” and fabulously rich people in “poor countries”.

(Excerpt) Read more at futurism.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: globalwarming; hoax; marxism; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Huskrrrr

Silly you. History starts TODAY. Winston, do you really believe there were no major hurricanes believe 2007 and 2016? How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?


21 posted on 09/22/2017 11:08:45 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Who should pay? Obviously conservative-minded Americans, who’s debt will be proportional to wealth.

Who should be compensated? Obviously any leftist-minded politician who can oversee those funds, making sure they go to the “right” place.


22 posted on 09/22/2017 11:12:01 AM PDT by jughandle (Big words anger me, keep talking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster
I think it was 2010 that Phil Jones (Michael Mann's pal at the CRU, the UK climate office) admitted that they had "lost" the data set underpinning their original 1990 climate warming study, and their temperature readings were no longer available. All he was willing/able to share were the temperature numbers after "adjustment" -- after they had been doctored, altered and fixed.

You wouldn't let an 8th graders with a science project get away with crap like that.

That should have sunk them right then and there.

But remember there's literally trillions of dollars riding on these frauds.

23 posted on 09/22/2017 11:13:09 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts." - Sgt. Joe Friday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Climate change is caused by (1) God or (2) Mother Nature, depending upon your beliefs. Good luck collecting from either!


24 posted on 09/22/2017 11:14:55 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Go ahead and tick-off (mother) nature and God (the father) (who’s responsible) and see where that getcha. Just sue the Sun and you have a case provable with real science in a court of law.


25 posted on 09/22/2017 11:21:36 AM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The real question...

Will there be any money left for “climate justice” after we’ve finished paying “reparations”?


26 posted on 09/22/2017 11:27:30 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Hey,
It doesn’t matter what it is, the U.S.A. is guilty and they need to pay dearly.

What a load of Hooey


27 posted on 09/22/2017 11:29:36 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (President Trump makes obammy look like the punk he is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The association between such events (hurricanes and floods) and climate change is now beyond serious question

Since many people act crazy during the full moon, the full moon causes insanity. This is beyond serious question.

28 posted on 09/22/2017 11:30:09 AM PDT by Daaave ("You Nexus huh? I design your eyes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

There is no man made climate change. No money should be spent for something that does not exist.


29 posted on 09/22/2017 11:39:09 AM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What an idiot. There is no way to make the SUN pay for hurricanes.


30 posted on 09/22/2017 11:45:35 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Constantly doing things in opposition to human nature is insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“San Francisco sues Exxon over ‘warming,’ but there’s 1 huge problem ...”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3588090/posts

“the city of San Francisco is suing five of the world’s largest oil and gas companies based on the “scientific consensus” that mankind is causing catastrophic damage to the planet through fossil fuels and other carbon emissions.”


31 posted on 09/22/2017 11:54:19 AM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The answer of who should pay is obvious, if you are a liberal. Who should pay is those who can pay!

Who should be compensated? Again, it is obvious to a liberal. Anyone who has little should be compensated.

Take from the rich and give to the poor (and the politicians).

Seriously, this is silly and stupid.


32 posted on 09/22/2017 12:26:17 PM PDT by Robert357 ( Dan Rather was discharged as "medically unfit" on May 11, 1954.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

https://i.redd.it/nyd82khwx71z.png

The AGW cult has never been about anything other than economically punishing The West for the great crime against humanity of defeating the soviet union.


33 posted on 09/22/2017 12:56:55 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Nobody and nobody


34 posted on 09/22/2017 2:40:36 PM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I got wet in a shower yesterday! Where are my reparations????????


35 posted on 09/22/2017 3:28:28 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Asia gets storms like this every year. But they don’t bitch and moan about it, in fact they get very little coverage. Typhoons have always been a part of life and some big ones hit this year. But you would never know that by the American mainstream media.


36 posted on 09/22/2017 6:57:24 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The “climate scientists” and model makers should have to pay for all of it. It’s their baby.


37 posted on 09/22/2017 9:16:45 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This article is a classic example of an intellectual activity that serves no practical purpose!

IOW, mental masturbation!


38 posted on 09/23/2017 9:16:41 PM PDT by Taxman (Replace the income tax with the FAIRtax and abolish the IRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson