Posted on 08/21/2017 10:16:09 AM PDT by detective
Some Flawless, Veneration Worthy Prophet of the You Tube apparently.
The bible itself says to personally give a reason for the hope within you.
It’s JMT’s move.
I am a mere 'seed' planter... ya know garden keeper... Your soil is rocky and hard as cement... ego that.
You haven’t even presented any seed, only hearsay and proud taunts.
As for actual hardness? Didn’t a certain prophet get told to make his forehead as bronze to a stubborn people?
Pal, you are in the little leagues looking at the tryouts for the world series.
Commie through and through.
Might start with the book of Joel called a Minor Prophet. Peter made Joel part of the Gospel in the book of Acts.
I have studied for more that three decades ... It is absolutely impossible to in mere moments cite the relevant Scriptures that Christ said He had foretold all things before the New Testament ever got put on plant fibers or animal skins. Now that is not my ‘ego’ talking, because I was dumber than a stump when I started.
Those that claim they come in the name of Christ have far more culpability than the unlearned uncivilized barbarians... In this particular case it is those calling themselves ‘holy’ in Jesus name that are moving these peoples and charging US to do so...
Really? Then I have shown even less, but then again I command far less in way of resources, and lack having position of influence on the same level as he did even when only a bishop Argentina, instead of now having the big-time major "woo" factor of occupying bishopic of Rome.
How evil is he? (think of that in terms of "your momma's so-oo fat.." and the call from background/off the stage; "how fat is she?" lol)
Eh, ok, if you say so. I'll not argue that point one way or another...
Oh, yes he is. Time to wake from that fantasy. Been one all his life. Was elected (detected & selected?) by a Roman Catholic College of Cardinals.
Of the 117 cardinals under the age of 80 at the time of Pope Benedict XVI's resignation, 115 participated in the conclave of March 2013 that elected his successor. The two who did not participate were Julius Riyadi Darmaatmadja (for health reasons) and Keith O'Brien (following allegations of sexual misconduct).[34] Of the 115 cardinals who participated in the conclave that elected Pope Francis, 48 were appointed by Pope John Paul II, and 67 by Pope Benedict XVI. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_of_Cardinals
Just ask Sal --- "indelibly marked" --- bwaahaAHAAHAH!
You missed the whole meaning of the article. You did not understand any of my comments.
Again you display ignorance. I am NOT trying out for anything. I have studied the WORD enough I recognize events as they happen. Three times Christ said a sign of His return was 'deception'... the flood of lies is well upon us, and Christ did not warn these lies would come from the Koran followers, but those that claim to come in His name.
Now get over yourself, in your fixing this 'forced' migration that spells out Jacob's trouble.
Go straight to hell, Poop!
I skimmed it until seeing nothing AT ALL "new" --MEGO (my eyes glazed over).
Sum it up a few sentences (like, maybe do some work, instead of shooting from the lip?) and then maybe I'll look into it. Or maybe, I won't. It could depend on the quality of the work.
If that were to be truly so, then you could better explain them. I already went through what you said in your own initial comment, line-by-line.
Just because I do not accept the 'just so' story of Bergoglio being allegedly "not" Roman Catholic, and "not" a legitimate 'pope' (as many around here assert) does not mean that I do not understand what is being alleged.
I can see (better said perhaps, I can "sense") the evil behind the ongoing effort to dissolve the borders of Western Nations who's populaces in times past had at the least some notion (and acceptance of) things of the Lord, as written, in scripture. There we go -- I spelled something out. Right, or wrong, that's more work than you've done in the last week!
Beyond the basics of that, you'll have to do better than just telling me that "I" do not understand, if you desire to keep defending the bullshit such as; 'Pope Francis is not a Catholic', that you just posted.
But Pope Francis, evil you say? Ok --fine. Most men are when it comes right down to it.
More narrowly: Bergoglio often does appear to be on the wrong side of things...in my eyes anyhow, and does appear to pay lip-service to, and lend support to forces that would continue dragging Western Civ down -- including now through unfettered immigration into those nations.
Is there something else, oh wise one, who knows so much -- including knowing what I understand, and what I do not (just because I didn't write you a book telling you EVERYTHING I know)?
Start writing. Spell it out. But be polite about it, and at least towards me -- do not tell me what I understand, and what I do not -- not unless you take time and trouble single out more precisely just what you think I "do not understand" etc.
Yourself having made such a claim with no backing whatsoever (other than vanity of your own imagination) was just so much cheap-stunt, dodgy bullshit piled on top of the last pile.
You are simply not smart enough to "read my mind" when attempting to prove whatever points you think valid -- that you think I somehow missed (because I did not stipulate, even though you did not either --other than what I went through, line-by-line?)
Or just shut up, and do not write and publish on the pages of FR at all, not unless doing so more carefully.
You did not specify what you were referring to "was prophesied".
I understand it could be a rather wide appraisal of conditions, with perhaps a few details serving as way-points -- but -- what are we looking for here? A collection of needles in a haystack, or some lost bricks from an old wall?
I had backtracked in this thread prior to first commenting, trying to see if I could find clear mention -- or even strong hint (if it were direct enough) of what you could be talking about more precisely --- but other than the subject being "immigration" there wasn't much to go on
How about if it's so clear to you what you were talking about --- that you organize that into some kind of flow? Provide an outline, or executive summary of key points perhaps, then if desired to better establish those, show from where in the Bible you may be (in your own mind) have gathered those things together?
Until then this is an almost complete waste of time.
“Start writing. Spell it out. But be polite about it, and at least towards me — do not tell me what I understand, and what I do not — not unless you take time and trouble single out more precisely just what you think I “do not understand” etc.’
Don’t give me homework assignments.
I have posted many comments explaining why I feel Pope Francis does not believe in Catholic principles and therefore is not a true Catholic or a man of God. I have posted many articles about his evil actions that go against the teachings of the Catholic Church. I have posted many articles and explained why he is an evil infiltrator in the Catholic Church.
You are welcome to read them,.as well as the many comments and other articles by other Freepers.
There are also many articles in various Catholic publications about the destructive influence of Pope Francis and how he is not a true Catholic.
11 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord God, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord:
What flesh being is going to break the Creator's Heavenly sent ‘famine’ of hearing the words of the LORD?
Joel 1
1 The word of the Lord that came to Joel the son of Pethuel.
2 Hear this, ye old men, and give ear, all ye inhabitants of the land. Hath this been in your days, or even in the days of your fathers?
3 Tell ye your children of it, and let your children tell their children, and their children another generation.
4 That which the palmerworm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the cankerworm eaten; and that which the cankerworm hath left hath the caterpiller eaten.
5 Awake, ye drunkards, and weep; and howl, all ye drinkers of wine, because of the new wine; for it is cut off from your mouth.
6 For a nation is come up upon my land, strong, and without number, whose teeth are the teeth of a lion, and he hath the cheek teeth of a great lion.
I do not have a clue the ‘state’ of your mind to look deeper into what Christ said Take ye heed, I have foretold you all things... That is between you and the Maker.
As a Christian, I take our responsibility to the sick and the poor seriously. Which helps more people: feeding large numbers of them where they are, or shipping a much smaller number of them halfway across the world? The Christian answer is obvious. I wish the Pope would apply logic when connecting faith to works, rather than just reading liberal talking points mindlessly.
And, exactly what are the rights? Nutball Pope violates their right to move in to the Vatican.
Agree. He is a liberation theology pimp.
So sorry, too late, I already did.
Not on this thread. I went and looked. But your own personal judgements on the matter - how could those matter unless your were "protesting" and had solid grounds to? Need I remind anyone that such had been forbidden (even under pain of death) in centuries past? Speaking of (cough-cough) 'Catholic' principles..."
You are welcome to read them,.as well as the many comments and other articles by other Freepers.
None of which equate myself not understanding the article linked to at Breitbart (which tells me nothing I was not aware of already) or your own comments, on this thread, which I understood fully enough in context of those things I had only briefly glanced at -- having not needed to read it in detail, since I was already aware of the details. Understand now?
So now you are talking about comments you made on OTHER threads that I allegedly do not understand?
And comments made by others too? Yeah I've seen that kind of thing and understood it too. I can understand what they are saying without having to agree that those appraisals of Bergoglio (that he is not 'Catholic') are actual truth of the matter. GET THAT through your head, and do it right now.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a [Roman] Catholic, born and bred, Jesuit trained, and is now serving as duly elected "pope" of the Roman Catholic Church. Buck up, buttercup, things are tough all over.
It's not like Protestants of past eras did not try to warn you folks -- troubles ahead -- due in some measure to troubles behind -- "papacy" as known & practiced within (and by) the Latin Church is blasphemous deformation and distortion of the spirit of the Church at it's inception in regard to gifts of administration.
Those who would in past eras defend papal systematic (and thus the ways of the Latin Church) defending those ways against most any and all critics (even putting critics to death) made the beds that Bergoglio and those weirdo faggot party-priests next door to the Vatican now sleep in.
Get a clue --but no -- Vanna won't loan you a letter. You'll have to guess, and get it right the first time, or else somebody else gets to take a turn at spinning the wheel.
Don’t waste my time. Don’t post to me.
How about you exposit it personally if it says something you think is burningly important here and you have made it your own.
Jesus said don’t be called rabbi. Your reference to another PERSON rather than a personal exposition of what you have made your own, looks like rabbi veneration.
Like BlueDragon said. Spit it out. Personally. Go long or go home, little leaguer.
Translation:
"Migrants' dignity and rights trump citizens' dignity and rights."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.