Posted on 08/14/2017 12:52:15 PM PDT by Kaslin
RUSH: Ill tell you what else lets do. Lets not stop at Robert E. Lee statues. Lets ban Gone With the Wind. Lets ban the book, and lets make sure the movie can no longer be purchased, rented, or exhibited anywhere. We will get rid of not just Robert E. Lee. Well tear down anything that tells anybody where Gettysburg is and what happened there. (interruption) Well, now wait. No, Gettysburg will stand.
Gettysburg will stand cause thats where they had their lunch handed to them, so Gettysburg will stand. But well go all the way back to Lincoln. Well take Lincolns name off of Mount Rushmore and well put Trump up there. (Im only kidding.) But, I mean, lets do this. Lets get rid of all of these outdoor signs of the nations injustice and unfairness. Get rid of everything so that American slavery is never known to have existed in any way. All monuments, all battlefields, all reenactments will be erased. (interruption) Oh, yes. (interruption) Well, nope, nope, nope. (interruption)
No. No, well get to the Native Americans, cause we (interruption) No, no, no. Dont get ahead of me here. The Native Americans are not in the protest here. The Native Americans are not on the march here. When they get in gear, then, yeah, well deal with them. But what we will do, is we will get rid of every outward sign of American evil, as defined by the left. I mean, if there is a restaurant with a Confederate flag logo, we close it.
We shut down any restaurant that serves chicken fried steak, that serves biscuits and gravy. I mean, anything that can be traced back to that evil heritage of the Confederacy. Get rid of all of it! That would make everybody shut up, right? That would just silence everybody about the inherent evil of the United States related to slavery. Make it disappear, and then everything would be okay, right? (sarcastic laugh) Ha-ha-ha-ha. I hope you get the point here.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: By the way, folks, theres all kinds of things, there are all kinds of things out there in addition to this story, and I do want to get to some of them today rather than be totally devoted to this, because this storys not gonna go away, either. No matter what Trump said today, this is just the latest, most recent story that propels the Get Rid of Trump effort, and this will the replace the Russian story and the Mueller investigation for a while and perhaps a big while, cause this You know, identity politics? This is it. This is what the Democrat Partys become, this is how they hope to win again and triumph. So this is gonna be milked for all its worth.
Nathan in Lynchburg, Virginia, as we head back to the phones. Great to have you, sir. How are you doing?
CALLER: Good. How you doing, Rush?
RUSH: Very, very well. Thank you.
CALLER: Hey, Im listening through WLNI, 105.9 here in Lynchburg. Charlottesville is 45 minutes north of me, and I want to answer your question. The mayor and the city council, theyre the ones responsible. The same thing happened when the Ku Klux Klan came in Charlottesville to protest
RUSH: Hang on a second. Responding for having the cops sand down? Is that what you mean?
CALLER: Theyre responsible for Heather Heyer dying. Theyre responsible for this whole mess. Three weeks ago, the same thing happened. Three weeks ago, a month ago, the same thing happened. They got a legitimate right to protest. They went up there, the Ku Klux Klan, and they protested but that time they had the cops en masse and in force, and this stopped them. Violence still happened. But it wasnt nearly as bad as this. But this time around? They didnt do anything about it, they sat by. Tear gas start coming; they abandoned their little post, the state police did, they abandoned where the safe zone was, and they just got out of the way of this mess. At the end of the day
RUSH: Okay, wait a minute. Why?
CALLER: I dont know. I think maybe if the FBI did their job and investigated some of the bank accounts of the mayor and the city council members, they might find out why. Thats just my opinion.
RUSH: So you think people were paid off to have the cops stand down? Your theory being that somebody wanted this to happen.
CALLER: Oh, yeah. Absolutely. Its a very liberal city. Charlottesville is one of the most liberal cities besides Richmond here in Virginia, and Virginias a battleground state for these monuments being torn down and taken down. As far as thats concerned, if youre gonna eradicate history, then civil rights movement never happened and therefore every Martin Luther King Jr. beloved that ever existed out there needs to go away as well, and lets just like you said get rid of all of this.
RUSH: Well, I thought people might misunderstand that. (laughing) When I said, Get rid of Gone With the Wind and get rid of the statues, I was (laughing) Youre, of course, right. If we did that, we would have to eliminate all of the things attached to it, and I was being facetious. Nobody will support it, even though thats why theyre protesting! That was my point to try to illustrate. Ill explain further.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: That last caller was very quick on the uptake there. Okay, Mr. Snerdley is afraid that if I dont explain this, the Drive-Bys will think that I was advocating that we scrub all African-Americans from American history, which is of course not my point. My point was to illustrate that what the people are protesting for, they would oppose if they got it. They want to take down the Robert E. Lee statues, right? Why? Because its a symbol of our horrid, racist, unfair, unequal, despicable past.
Well, if thats true, why stop there? I ask. I mean, theres a lot more. Robert E. Lee was not the only one of them. Theres all kind of Beauregards down there and any number of guys that have statues that have remembrances and that have been honored as great military people. Even though they were fighting for the Confederacy, they have been honored as brilliant strategists or what have you. They were dedicated to their cause. Gone With the Wind is a book and a movie that is practically a (sigh) Whats the correct word to use here?
Its a remembrance of the time weve lost. It was a romantic treatment of that era leading to the Souths defeat. Gotta get rid of it. Those people were humanized. Why, those Confederate soldiers, they liked women and they proposed to them! They treated em with chivalry. They went dancing with em and they had dinner with em. You know, and they said, Yes, maam, all kinds of polite things. You cant have that portrayed. These people were savages. Gotta get rid of any reminder whatsoever of this horrid aspect in our past.
Thats what theyre advocating here, are they not? Well, if you did that, there wouldnt be a single Martin Luther King Boulevard in this country. There wouldnt be a Martin Luther King, if youre gonna eliminate that aspect of American history. And who would be the first to object if, in the process ? If you dont stop getting rid of the Robert E. Lee statue but you keep going, the very people demanding to get rid of the Robert E. Lee statues would be the same people standing there saying, Whoa, you cant do that! You cant get of Martin Luther King?
Well, we gotta get rid of Robert E. Lee. I mean, who came first here in and if you get rid of the guy that came first then anything that came after him didnt exist, either. We gotta scrub it all. You cant! You cant. The point is that, once again, the supposed highbrow the supposed sophisticated, refined motivations for all of the anger and violence and hatred on the left will not hold up to intellectual scrutiny. Because if you take it to its logical conclusion, at some point in that timeline theyre gonna protest what youre doing.
Yeah, well get rid of Robert E. Lee. But then if we start going further, at some point theyre gonna draw the line and they wont permit it. Because there are certain aspects of this history that they cherish and they love, like Dr. King and any number of other associated heroes and heroines from that era. Thats the only point to illustrate that what theyre claiming to be angry about, they actually would oppose if you went all-in on this. Does that help them, Mr. Snerdley, do you think? Are they capable of understanding that?
Yes, pretentious and boring. Why inflict it of future humans.
While I like the term “Delusional Lying Left, I’m thinking that it needs one more word:
Delusional Unapologetic Lying Left
Of course, that makes the acronym DULL. :=)
Back in the ‘60s, we had a Reader’s Digest set of records, “Treasury Of Great Operettas”, which is long gone. I found the collection on CDs a few years ago and ordered it. Missing was “Porgy And Bess”. Everything is being scrubbed.
I’m almost afraid to say that our kindergarten play was “Little Black Sambo”. (I was a pancake.)
Should We Ban Gone With the Wind?
________________________________
Ban all Mark Twain works too.
Because of N-word Jim.
(Gasp!)
The 1915 one.
I found it tedious and unwatchable.
:)
The left, like the Taliban, ISIS and other Islamic groups is trying to erase the the fact that the Democrats (Marxists) were the instigators of American slavery along with the Islamics who sold them the slaves. KKK a right wing organization? I think not. Communists all inclusive? I think not. Destroy any mention of the past and the future starts in the next generation.
They tried to ban “Blazing Saddles”.
One of the nicest things my first wife did was buy tickets for a Broadway style production of Porgy and Bess for my birthday. I love that musical.
Plenty of episodes on Youtube. As a kid I always got a chuckle out of watching the Kingfish get his just reward at the end. Watching them more recently I noticed the black actor Roy Glenn, who played Mr. Prentice in the movie "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" in several of the episodes. I think he played a well-spoken lawyer or maybe a judge and such appearances would indicate that the Kingfish was not representative of black people in general.
Amos n Andy strikes me as a black version of "All in the Family". Many truths revealed because of or in spite of common stereotypes.
We could ban everything having anything to do with slavery and the Civil War. It would all cease to exist and no one would have anything to whine about anymore.
Or what about old Stepin Fechit movies?
Or old Charlie Chan movies??
Heck, how far do you want to go censoring things?
How can a classic sitcom such as “I Love Lucy” be allowed today? Lucy was a traditional housewife and it was clear that Ricky was head of the household.
Heck, what about Father Knows Best, Leave It To Beaver, or dozens of other family sitcoms of the past??? In all of those, you had a man of the house, and you had a wife who was in a traditional role.
If the liberals want to carry this to the extreme, very little of old TV shows or old movies would be permitted under their censorship.
It’s apparently gone now...with the wind, I assume.
However, they did offer me a passel of charming BLACK POWER suggestions, instead.
:D
>> Try finding a DVD of Song of the South.
I found an Australian website 2 years ago with a downloadable MP4 copy. Excellent movie.
And that is why torrent sites exist.
By modern standards, yes.
But you have to view it with and eye to the era in which it was produced.
To Movie goers of that age, it was like ‘The Wizard of Oz’ or “Close Encounters” or ‘Jaws’ ...........................
>> Try finding “Amos and Andy”.
Amos and Andy is easy to obtain and since the copyright has expired, copies of the episodes are downloadable.
Ocean vessels! We have to get rid of ALL ocean going vessels.
IIRC , congressman Lewis claimed that better than 100M slaves were thrown overboard on their way to NA and that the sharks permanently altered their feeding habits to follow these ships and that even today, sharks follow ocean going ships looking for a slave snack.
Ships gotta be some kind of trigger or something.
Even better.
Guess my thought was DelUsional Lying Left but I like yours too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.