Posted on 07/17/2017 2:57:05 PM PDT by Kaslin
RUSH: We just told you about Jody Allard, the feminist writer who compares her own sons to rapists. They’re teenagers. She says they’re not safe because they have penises, and because they have penises they are prone to rape women, and she writes about them this way. And they’ve gotten old enough now that they’re able to find out that she’s writing this way about them, and they don’t like their mother. And she thinks that’s their problem.
Washington Post yesterday, Sunday edition, Kristine Phillips, headline: “Why These Professors Are Warning Against Promoting the Work of Straight, White Men.” So you have Jody Allard whose own sons are rapists because they’re men. And she writes that she’s worried about them because they’re men. All men are barbarians, all men are rapists, all men are predators. This is part of feminist teaching. And now we have this story: “Why These Professors Are Warning Against Promoting the Work of Straight, White Men.”
Ready for a new word? Stand by. “Academics and scholars must be mindful –” Now, see, another thing. The Post treats this as legitimately inspired, legitimately serious. The Post does not mock this at all. The Post thinks, wow, this is cutting edge. This is something that we need to be on the right side of so that our readers realize that we are hip and with it.
“Academics and scholars must be mindful about using research done by only straight, white men, according to two scientists –” Scientists, you see. Yes, scientists, you can’t argue with scientists, lab coats and they look official and they think global warming is — can’t argue with scientists. Like Stephen Hawking, who says if we don’t fix climate change, the world is gonna be 480 degrees in 80 years. Scientists. “– according to two scientists who argued that it oppresses diverse voices and bolsters the status of already privileged and established white male scholars.”
So we cannot promote the work of straight white men anymore because it’s discriminatory and oppresses diversity. Geographers, these scientists are — have you heard — this story contains a term “feminist geography.” Have you ever heard of feminist geography? You’ve heard of it now. Can you imagine what it is? Do you have any idea what feminist geography is? Did you know that geography was feminist or could be? Geographers, people that do maps. People that study geography. These are scientists.
Their names are Carrie Mott and Daniel Cockayne, and they argue in a recent paper that promoting the work of straight white men perpetuates what they call “white heteromasculinism.” Promoting the work of straight white men “perpetuates what they call ‘white heteromasculinism,’ which they defined as a ‘system of oppression’ that benefits only those who are ‘white, male, able-bodied, economically privileged, heterosexual, and cisgendered.'”
Do you know what a cis is, folks? Do you even know that? Snerdley, do you know what a cisgender is? A cisgender is a person whose gender identity matches their birth sex. This is how convoluted this is. You’re born a man and you think you’re a man, you’re a cis. C-I-S, cisgendered. You have to be labeled. You can’t just be a man because some men identify as women. That means they’re not cisgendered. They’re transgendered. Transgender versus cisgendered. Heterosexual versus homosexual. Breeder versus gay. I mean, it’s not s-i-s-s-y gender, it’s c-i-s, cisgender.
Folks, this is insane. This is literal cockamamie. We have to stop promoting the work of straight white men because it promotes white heteromasculinity, essentially. We’ve got to stop white masculinity because it is a system of oppression and it benefits only those who are white, male, able-bodied, economically privileged, heterosexual, and cisgendered.
Now, what is it about all of those characteristics that the left despises? Who are these people that were white, male, able-bodied, that’s bad. See, able-bodied is bad, because not everybody is, it’s unfair. We should stop benefiting those who can take care of themselves, it’s not fair. It is actually discriminatory if you are self-reliant. If you’re able-bodied, if you’re able to do things, take care of yourself, you are discriminatory. And you are part of white heteromasculinity. Economically privileged, heterosexual, cisgendered. All of this, this defines normal!
If you are normal, you are bad for our culture. If you are white male, able-bodied, economically privileged, heterosexual, and know that you’re a man, if you’re a man, you are the problem.
“Mott, a professor at Rutgers University in New Jersey, and Cockayne, who teaches at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, argued that scholars or researchers disproportionately cite the work of white men, thereby unfairly adding credence to the body of knowledge they offer while ignoring the voices of other groups, like women and black male academics. Although citation seems like a mundane practice, the feminist professors argue that citing someone’s work has implications on his or her ability to be hired, get promoted and obtain tenured status, among others.”
So if you’re normal, you unfairly get most of the goodies. If you’re normal, you get most of the jobs, you get most of the money, you get most of the happiness, and it isn’t fair. The unnormal, the abnormal are being discriminated against by the normal. What did we say last week that much of this culture war is about? Changing the definition of “normal.”
“‘This important research has drawn direct attention to the continued underrepresentation and marginalization of women, people of color. … To cite narrowly, to only cite white men … or to only cite established scholars, does a disservice not only to researchers and writers who are othered by white heteromasculinism.'”
What does othered mean? You know you’re an other? Who are othered, researchers and writers who are othered by white heteromasculinism. In other words, these white heteromasculine types, they “other” everybody else. They turn ’em into others because they’re normal, and the others aren’t. They’re discriminating. They’re creating this group of people that are isolated, not normal. These are the words of these two scholars, these geographers who are scholars.
“Mott and Cockayne did not immediately respond to questions from The Washington Post, but Mott told Campus Reform last week that they decided to write about citation practices after observing that research done by white men are relied upon more heavily than those done by experts from other backgrounds.”
So there’s racism everywhere, sexism everywhere, misogyny everywhere. This is this kind of crap that’s ripping up every shred.
To deliberately NOT cite established scholars is to ignore established science. These two geographers are blithering idiots.
Obviously the location of china on their maps must be different - because Marco Polo was a cisgendered white man.
(Why is it so satisfying that spell check doesn’t know the word “cisgendered”?)
PIV is always rape, ok?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3108209/posts
Saul Alinsky taught that you always have to keep people discontented so that they would be more willing to rebel against the status quo. That is why Leftists must ALWAYS be complaining about some perceived injustice. They NEED to portray the USA as being unfair and unjust, so that they can promote radical social change. This is just more of the continual agitation that community organizers (and Obama) do. It will NEVER end.
"...Jody Allard..."
Historically, there were three crimes that got the death penalty.
Murder.
Kidnapping.
And rape.
Of course that was from back when men knew how to protect women and children, instead of ACTING like women and children!
Well said, Rushbo.
Her sons must not be black because it would be racist to think that all black men are rapists just because they have a penis.
He did, didn’t he?
Jeez!...Dont say anything!...That's lawsuit material for the ba$tards.....Oxford and Merriam-Webster will now add it and settle out of court at the 1st threat..
Of course that was from back when men knew how to protect women and children, instead of ACTING like women and children!
Well said DJF
I beg to differ. It CAN be ended.
... and modest, humble women recognized that they needed to be protected by men, because they were, in fact, as a whole, the weaker sex.
(They never took the vote; they were given the vote by civilized white males whom they now arrogantly denounce.)
I’ve have a penis now for 55+ years, haven’t raped anything yet!
It will only end when normal whites start to go on the offensive. Physically.
The first to target are self-hating whites like these and the organizations that support them - they are the leaders of the antiwhite packs.
As long as all we do is “decry” these attacks, they’ll just keep dishing them out.
So naturally your work will be promoted more often because there are more normals than there are perverts.
No matter how they shout about it remember they are the perverts, you are normal. Be proud of your normal, well balanced life.
She is a truly NASTY woman.
“As long as all we do is “decry” these attacks, they’ll just keep dishing them out.”
Yep. Antifa backed right down when we started showing up with rifles (in Texas) or otherwise punched a few in the face and then kicked the crap out of them when they went down.
Violence is a tool. What it produces is dependent on the morality of those using it. I’m sorry the world is flawed - but it is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.