Posted on 06/25/2017 5:37:50 AM PDT by Kaslin
Government is a drug. It’s not always easy figuring out the right amount to take. But it is easy to get hooked on dangerously high doses.
And perhaps nowhere can this be better seen, right now, than in the Republicans’ ObamaCare mess.
Republican politicians feel trapped. They may know that ObamaCare amounts to government overdose — regulation and subsidy at poisonous levels. Why else would they have promised to get rid of it? But kicking a government habit is hard to do. It’s not just that regular people get hooked on benefits, no matter how ill-conceived, ill-funded, and unsustainable. More importantly, politicians get hooked on giving people benefits. Taking benefits away is not exactly a proven vote-getting strategy.
Especially when the main pushers of the drug, the major media and coastal cultural elites, go into hysterics the moment even the newest and most creaky program is targeted for mere modification.
And yet promises were made. For years Republicans have won election after election by putting the kibosh on ObamaCare high on the priority list. Last year Donald Trump got elected president in part on a promise to repeal. But how serious he was, or how serious any of them are, in repealing the program is not at all certain.
I take that back: At least five members of the Senate do seem serious about taking America off the ObamaCare fix: Senators Rand Paul of Kentucky, Ted Cruz of Texas, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Mike Lee of Utah, and , Dean Heller of Nevada.
Last week, when Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) introduced a bill to compromise between the House’s recent Affordable Health Care Act and the current ObamaCare (Affordable Care Act), the first four objected.
‘‘Currently, for a variety of reasons, we are not ready to vote for this bill,” their joint statement from Thursday reads.
Their objections? Well, they agree that there are “provisions in this draft that represent an improvement to our current healthcare system but . . .”
— and this is a big but —
“...it does not appear this draft as written will accomplish the most important promise that we made to Americans: to repeal Obamacare and lower their healthcare costs.’’ Their opposition puts McConnell’s snake-oil cure in jeopardy.
Dr. Rand Paul is the key figure in this opposition. One of Capitol Hill’s ongoing amusements has been watching the junior Kentucky senator repeatedly pit himself against his state’s senior member — who, the Boston Globe tells us, is threatening “to bring the bill to a vote next week even if he doesn’t have the necessary votes.”
Pressure tactics.
Which is awfully helpful in shoving an obviously bad bill through Congress.
Though ObamaCare’s demerits are manifold — it has hit many people with huge insurance price spikes and coverage downgrades, does little (if anything) to restrain healthcare costs in general from spiraling ever upward, and is increasingly unstable on an institutional level (with major insurance companies pulling out of the state exchanges) — it has succeeded in “covering” a cohort of patients that had not had medical insurance before. And some of these folks had indeed suffered, previously, from lack of access to treatment. It is those latter beneficiaries who can be pointed to by ObamaCare’s supporters as proof of how vitally necessary the program is — even if they can do so only by ignoring those whom the program over-burdened or hurt outright.
This is understood instinctively on Capitol Hill. Few government programs help everybody. Some people gain; others lose. But recognition of this is suppressed by major media and cultural elites. They focus on beneficiaries, ignoring both those directly harmed by regulations and those who are made to bear the bulk of the financial burden. (The only major exceptions are those cases when those burdened are directly targeted as apt “donors,” as “the rich” or “top one-percenters” from whom more wealth not only can but must be extracted.) And, above all, they deny any investigation into broader negative results.
For they have a narrative — a pro-drug narrative, in that it is a pro-government narrative. Though only addicts and pushers pretend that more drugs are always better than fewer drugs, that is the precise tack our cultural elites take in pushing for ever-increasing doses of State intervention.
The upshot? The media and cultural mavens have sane politicians (a rare breed in any case) over the proverbial barrel. The Republicans who promised an end to ObamaCare serve as the fish, easy targets. Pressuring would-be reformers proves easy — as easy as shooting fish in a barrel.
Which is why so few politicians dare do what Senators Paul, Cruz, Lee, Johnson, and Heller are doing: sticking to the idea of a more thorough dismantling of ObamaCare.
While many news sources are highlighting how McConnell’s bill greatly reduces federal spending on health care, the legislation “looks a lot like ObamaCare, actually,” according to Dr. Paul, an ophthalmologist when not wearing his senatorial hat.
Shortsightedly, the Republicans long ago gave up on the best plan: repeal ObamaCare in toto, then follow up by repealing other, previous federal regulations and even tax law, allowing medical and insurance markets to become unstuck. This would leverage the power of markets to do what government cannot: provide better service at ever-cheaper (not ever-increasing) prices.
President Trump, when campaigning, even suggested doing some of these things. His statements in favor of opening up the insurance markets, rather than micro-managing and subsidizing them, provided some of us with hope. But after he took office, the consistent message from Republicans has been “repeal and replace.”
Not “repeal and more repeal.”
Too many mainstream Republican congressmen lack the courage of their constituents’ convictions. They apparently do not really believe that a freed-up health care system and insurance market can work to the general good.
At least, not in time for the next election.
And that’s the trap. Fearing short-term flak, they don’t dare stick up for doing what they surely know to be the best thing for the country, sticking to their promises and thereby producing long-term gains.
We’ve seen this kind of desperation before. In addicts.
That must explain the DTs the left is having right now.
My personality is about 180 degrees from that of a politician.
If I were old, and rich, and famous and powerful ... I’d be thinking “I’ve achieved my goals; I’ve done it all”. And then I’d focus on doing the right thing for my country and for the generations to come.
But the Senators and other politicians seem to focus on “getting along” with others in the Establishment so that they can all get older and richer and more famous and more powerful. It’s just never enough.
But what’s the point?
The problem with government is that it only attracts those who hunger for power. The ones that get elected hide their desire the best.
Government should not be involved in healthcare. Period.
Senator Merkley did write me back and told me to just hang on, single payer is coming soon!! He implied, keep paying $1278 a month to an insurance company that won't pay for any specialists and is going out of business at the end of this year, we will have one insurance company to choose from next year.
All three are fine with it, no worries, no problem. The Democrats on health care sound like Jamaicans.
And let’s remember the everlasting alchemy performed by subsequent scotus decisions unaffected by repeal.
1. Scotus transmuted an unconstitutional penalty into a tax.
2. Congress may force citizens to purchase a commercial product.
3.”Exchanges established by the state,” is the equivalent of exchanges established by DC.
Senator Mike Lee Proposed The *One* Change To Health Care Act That ALL Conservatives Should Demand, and one that should be applied to most federal programs.
http://therightscoop.com/mike-lee-will-vote-for-new-health-care-bill-on-one-condition/
“I would still be willing to vote for it if it allowed states and/or individuals to opt-out of the Obamacare system free-and-clear to experiment with different forms of insurance, benefits packages, and care provision options.”
This is pure genius, should apply to most federal programs, and should be the rallying cry of conservatives across America.
It is good enough to be enshrined in a constitutional amendment.
If you could, would you “opt out” of Obamacare, Social Security and Medicare (and their FICA tax); providing the Census any information other than the “actual enumeration” authorized by the constitution; etc.?
Heller is opposed because the bill doesn’t keep medicare expansion.
1) Heller is wishy washy. 2) Heller will lose.
“Government should not be involved in healthcare. Period.”
Completely agree. The strategy I would pursue if I had the power to make the call: leave everything just as it is. Obamacare will still be Obamacare, with no Republican fingerprints on it. It will collapse of its own weight in 2-5 years, maybe sooner. Then the lesson will have been learned in the only way lessons get learned, bitter experience. And maybe, just maybe, the Republicans won’t try to pick up the pieces but just leave it to the private sector and individual medical providers and consumers to find their own ways to manage their own health needs. The poor will have to rely on the charity of their fellow citizens, who will be there once it becomes clear that the government will not and cannot do it.
Once again repub quislings and capons are traitors to their electorate. This remains pathetic and tiresome.
Which is why we love President Trump. I see him in the same light as the founding fathers who placed their lives, their family and their wealth on the line at the risk of being executed for treason to do the right thing in creating our nation.
President Trump risks no less, I mean...just look at these leftists savages and listen to the things they say!
It that happens, it will be blamed on the GOP unless the 2018 mid terms swing to the dems.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.