Posted on 06/15/2017 3:39:07 PM PDT by Kaslin
Professor Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prizewinner for Physics trashes the global warming/climate change/extreme weather pseudoscientific clap-trap and tells Obama he is "Dead Wrong". This was the 2012 meeting of Nobel Laureates.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
This Global Warming guy has to go
The middle east is too hot so the people move to Europe. The heat sends the cold air to the north/south poles. It may not be global but it’s warming. Right?
more ice, less ice, more snow, less snow, more wind, less wind...... it’s all evilllll climate change, and it’s all Trump’s fault!!!!
These Leftards talk as though the climate had been unchanging for thousands and millions of years, until just now....
Do we live in an insane asylum or what? What anti-science idiot leftards.
I just had a discussion here on Free Republic with someone who believes that the arctic is melting and it is going to release massive amounts of methane and we will have runaway global warming because of it. They posted a Google Search with all sorts of stories which “confirmed” their fears.
I mentioned that in the 1930s which unadjusted records from ground based weather recording show was warmer than it is currently... that the arctic ocean became navigable in the summer. It was thought that the “Northern Passage” would soon be the most economical route to get goods from the far east to Europe and the East Coast of the United States.
Somehow it didn’t cause runaway global warming then. And in fact during WWII a flight of airplanes were forced down in Greenland. 50 years later they were found again under hundreds of feet of ice and some were recovered. The ice in Greenland and the Antarctic are both near record levels. The only thing remarkable about today’s climate is that the left have been able to stir up so much misinformation over it.
Do you mean the one in the Youtube video link that I posted in post#1?
For American leftists, the NYT is read for guidance and direction. Like a combination of scripture and clergical message.
‘Scientists’ who use politics to prop up and fund their research make me almost physically ill. Seriously.
My suggestion would be to have a televised conference during which global warming advocate scientists and those who disagree with them debate the data. If the science is so settled, this is a perfect opportunity for proponents of anthropomorphic global warming to make their points publicly. On the other hand, if they can’t publicly support their interpretation of their own data then that deserves to be showcased publicly as well.
That is the cutest graphic to date. I am now going to send you all of my monies. :)
The only thing that bothers me is China's one child policy which he did invoke.
Sure makes a lot more sense than Al Gore.
Gore should stick to what he knows best....the BENEFITS of massage therapy.
Less ice means global warming. More ice means even worse global warming. But the worst of all possible scenarios is if there is the same amount of ice. That means that global warming will kill everything on Earth in 5 minutes.
I won't believe THAT unless you post a link to the conversation..../.....
Good. I’ll tell my dad to build a fire in the fridge to cool it down more.
As a follow up to my prior comment, “gleeaikin” was in agreement with you..........
I’m definitely not a global warming guy but what I have read is the ice flow free in the ocean is what’s wrong. Not ice sheet size.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.