Posted on 05/28/2017 7:44:38 AM PDT by LS
After they’ve walked out, change all the locks and don’t let them back in. Hire replacements ASAP.
The most recent security breach narrative is that the Muslim Paki clan worked for about 80 Democrat House members.
But the revelation about RCC staffers being Democrats means the Pakis' criminal network could have easily extended into Republican members' emails, documents, intel and various electronics.
This would also explain the Democrats' refusal to comment on the magnitude of the security breach endangering Americans' safety and security.
FACTS ON FILE
<><> Paki/hackers were shoehorned into their jobs by Dem Cong Wasserman Schultz and Cong Jackie Speier.
<><> the security breach supposedly involves only Democrats-—about 80 members of the House employed the Pakis.
<><>The Paki/hackers allegedly stole US govt property....electronic storage devices taken from Democrats' offices.
<><>they funneled crucial US intel to an external server....
<><> probably left “back doors” to external servers to conduct surveillance remotely.
<><> removed hundreds of thousands of dollars of equipment from Democrat members’ offices, including computers and servers,
<><> ran a procurement scheme on our tax dollars
<><> the Pakis bought costly electronic equipment, then overcharged the House administrative office that assigns the Pakis to members.
I get it. Why ANY Republican would have a SINGLE Dem on his staff is beyond me.
And that’s the problem. It will literally take a dictator for real change to come.
Yeah. I know. Confronting the scope of the problem is draining. That’s why people here want Trump to fight the courts, fight congress, blah, blah. Well, he’s chipping away at the tip of an iceberg, and while he’s having great success this is a titanic undertaking that needs more than one guy.
Yeah. Wasn't it just a few months ago we were assured that the corp of permanent DC employees are apolitical?
I can't imagine why everyone who walks out isn't fired. If they can't be fired, relegated to janitorial staffs or something, and not in the WH or anywhere near HOR and US Senate buildings.
What is the attraction for a Conservative to work in Washington DC?
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi arrogantly dodged questions from a reporter inquiring about why the Pakistani IT staffer under investigation by U.S. Capitol Police for cyber-security breaches still has a role as an advisor to Cong Debbie asserman Schultz----the person that hired the Paki/Hackers and paid them three times the salaries of Americans in similar jobs.
Via The Daily Caller: U.S. Capitol Police and other agencies are probing the cyber activities of three brothers who had jobs as congressional staffers at the office of information technology for lawmakers on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, The Daily Caller News Foundation first reported. Brothers Imran, Abid and Jamal Awan also provided their services for other Democratic members in the lower chamber.
When they came under suspicion by law enforcement for accessing the House network without permission last February, they were all banned from accessing it. While some Democratic lawmakers dismissed Imran from their employ when the story, others, like Florida Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz kept him on.
A reporter aggressively asked Pelosi why one of the IT staffers under investigation is still employed. As per usual, Nancy Pelosi arrogantly responded:
PELOSI'S CYA RESPONSE: “Well the people under investigation [include] the Attorney General of the United States. I mean, what are we talking about here?” (Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Is it possible these are filled by DC residents, who are mostly Dems? We have the same situation in NYC, where there are supposed to be a Republican and a Democrat at each voting booth but often they are both Dems, because we are so outnumbered here and not enough Republicans want to do those exhausting jobs on election day.
I suspect this story is wrong but wouldn’t be shocked if it is true.
Bump for your excellent post.
We CAN make a difference and change DC.
I agree with that. In fact I wouldn’t be surprised if the Deep State approves which Dem and which Repub will run for office: the Deep State chooses those candidates that they can blackmail if they need to. It’s all about blackmailing the Congress.
Hope not. This is seriously worse than even I dreamed, and I’m a realist.
yeah, fine but what about the 2,000 OTHER staffers who run the government? The 97 is a drop in the bucket.
I think that’s possible, but if so, it still needs to be changed. Staffs need to be drastically reduced so that you CAN have loyal people. This is just outrageous.
B/c it means the Paki/hackers had access to hundreds of Americans' Social Security numbers, IRS tax ID'S, and so on. Not to mention having inside info on the operations of dozens of US agencies....including the IRS.
REALITY CHECK When a constituent contacts their Rep w/ a problem, the member requires a Social Security number and tax ID number to navigate US govt agencies.
Yet, not one Democrat has surfaced expressing concern for their constituents, not one Democrat took the time to warn consituents their privacy may have been invaded and their interests compromised.
On the contrary, as many as 80 Democrats employing the Paki/hackers are in hiding, unwilling to admit to their utter stupidity in the name of diversity.
=========================================
TIME TO HIT BACK HARD---Demand that the names of the Democrats who employed these Paki/hackers be revealed, so that constituents can protect their interests.
SPREAD THE WORD: Constituents who had their privacy invaded have a good case against the gullible irresponsible Democrat members.
======================================================
The Awans struck a goldmine---could be peddling Americans' SS and tax ID numbers all over the globe.
ASAP, Compose a letter to your House member thusly:
•Did you employ the Awan clan?
•If so, when did you dismiss them and why?
•Have you been interviewed by investigators?
•Do you know that the FBI is not involved?
•Do you know why the FBI is not involved
•Can you tell me when was the last time Capitol Police investigated an espionage case?
•Do you know anything about the theft of 20 computers from congressional staff?
•When did you learn of these crimes?
•Can you tell me how many identities the Awan clan have?
•Please tell me how many US govt checks the Awan clan are cashing.
•Can you tell me if the Awan clan are registered agents of foreign governments?
•Please list the names of organizations advocating the overthrow of the US govt the Awan clan belong to
•Did any House members report the theft of govt computer equipment?
•Did any House members report falsification of official govt documents?
===============================================
FREEPERS, IMPORTANT TO ADD THIS TO THE BOTTOM OF YOUR LETTER:
COPIES OF THIS LETTER ADDRESSED TO YOU ARE BEING SENT TO:
Pres Trump
AG Sessions
FBI Wire Fraud Division
IRS-Fraud Unit
Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General,
Department of Commerce Office of Inspector General.
DOJ Criminal Division-- Public Integrity Sect
DOJ Criminal Division--Organized Crime and Gang Section.
Internal Revenue Service's Criminal Investigation Division
U.S. Dept of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security Office of Export Enforcement
You pretty much nailed it. Only Dem’s and RINOs, willingly, want to be part of that culture and climate. They’re the ones that want those government jobs, that they can have for life, working in the shadows. Going to all the “cool spots” in DC and bragging about their positions to others like them. They’re the ones that keep the bubble around DC, intact and out of touch.
Normal, hard working people, want no part of that. That is what is going to make draining the swamp, very difficult.
To quote another, “That hardly seems FAIR.”
Thanks for drawing attention.
Bfl
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.