Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cable News Ratings Shock: Fox Slips to 3rd Place in Primetime for First Time in 17 Years
Breitbart ^ | 22 May 2017 | Ben Kew

Posted on 05/23/2017 1:23:28 PM PDT by conservative98

Fox News slipped to third place in the primetime demo for the first time in 17 years last week as competitors CNN and MSNBC enjoyed a surge in viewership thanks to a chaotic news week for President Donald Trump’s administration.

For the week of May 15-19, Fox News averaged just 497,000 viewers in the advertiser-coveted key demo of adults 25-54 during primetime hours, compared to CNN’s 589,00 and MSNBC’s 611,000, according to the Hollywood Reporter, which cited data from ratings tracker Nielsen.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cnn; fox; foxnews; foxnewsratings; msnbc; murdoch; top10
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: conservative98
They're all the same now.

If we turn on the TV, it's on One America News. Not as slick, but not as slick. Ya know? d;^)

Seems like real even-keeled reporting.

41 posted on 05/23/2017 1:56:22 PM PDT by CopperTop (Outside the wire it's just us chickens. Dig?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Ain’t no shock


42 posted on 05/23/2017 1:56:27 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

I agree with that. Now he’s even willing to lose money to take Trump down.

It’s why I have a big problem with these conglomerate media organizations.

Who cares if FoxNews, CBS, ABC, or NBC make money? They can lose money as long as the corporate parent organization can take the single sector losses.


43 posted on 05/23/2017 1:58:00 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Say what you want, but BOR gave FOX the ratings that they once enjoyed.


That’s true.


44 posted on 05/23/2017 1:59:08 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives.have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: meyer

“They lost the Trump voter crowd.”

They lost the Republican base and the O’Reilly liberals.


45 posted on 05/23/2017 2:00:48 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("“In America, we don’t worship government, we worship God.”" DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

I have no doubt FNC will get more liberal, but I don’t think it has happened much yet.

Love him or hate him O’Reilly was a big ratings draw. I often got irritated with him for his bloviating but often went back. His ratings allowed him to attract better guests than hosts with lower ratings would.

I like Tucker, but his shtick gets tiresome pretty quickly. I’ve lost interest.

Martha McCallum is just boring.

The Five is awful, even worse without Eric Bolling. Gutfeld is often insufferable, Guillfoyle is sharp, but her sluttiness is distracting, Perino is boring, Williams is detestable. Their only primetime show I’m interested in is Hannity, and I’m usually in bed by 10 pm.

My unsolicited advice is to replace The Five with a show with a host who’s interesting and knows his or her ass from page 8.

Also Bolling’s new show at 5 pm is just an embarrassment: none of their hosts is a specialist at anything as far as I can tell.

I like Hemmer/Bream from 9 - 11 am.


46 posted on 05/23/2017 2:04:08 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connyankee
No surprise here faux news gets what they deserve now that the kids are running the show it’s a bunch more liberals on there anyway.

I started noticing this some time ago. It is over a year; but, I began to notice that the people I was used to seeing doing commentary and such had been replaced by people I had never heard of, nor had ever seen before. It didn't take long to catch the more liberal slant from these people.

I am as curious as a previous poster, to see if the other networks gained audience when FNC lost ratings; or, if they just turned the t.v. off.

47 posted on 05/23/2017 2:12:20 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Fox viewers have been betrayed - they’re like jilted lovers - they will punish Fox, and they won’t be back......


48 posted on 05/23/2017 2:26:07 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98
Cable News Ratings Shock: Fox Slips to 3rd Place in Primetime for First Time in 17 Years

I want to know what you are drinking or smoking!

49 posted on 05/23/2017 2:29:03 PM PDT by TheConservativeTejano (God Bless Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

“Fox ‘n Friends,” especially when Kilmeade and Earhardt are off and Pete Hegseth and Abby Huntsman are on, is by far the best show FNC has going other than Hannity and occasionally Tucker. The rest of the FNC line-up sucks big time.

Fox Business is the go-to channel now, along with OAN.


50 posted on 05/23/2017 2:29:45 PM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

What’s the “shock?” Faux News sucks. Watch One America News OAN IS what Fox pretended to be.


51 posted on 05/23/2017 2:32:39 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Fox needs to give prime time slots to Laura Ingraham and Mark Steyn, and demote McCallum and Watters. I think their ratings would rebound in a week. McCallum has no star appeal (boring), and Watters is just a one-trick-pony “segment” guy; he can’t carry an entire hour.


52 posted on 05/23/2017 2:43:16 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

I don't have cable any longer. I have always liked Martha, but I haven't seen her recently. It's hard for me to make a good case for her, not having watched her recently.

She seemed to always be upbeat, and a good provider of news. Other than that, I can't say much.

She was fine as far as I was concerned. I don't need star power. Put up against a guy like O'Reilly, I'd honestly take Martha hands down.

As for Watters, I think you have a point. He's great in the quirky moment, but not as a host.

Again, I don't watch him regularly either.

Thanks for the comments.

53 posted on 05/23/2017 2:50:48 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Fox has strange shows now. To many new ones. I like OAN.


54 posted on 05/23/2017 2:58:52 PM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20

I haven’t been watching OANN enough yet. I should.

Thanks for reminding me of that.

As for FoxNews, I didn’t care for O’Reilly, but I think they really screwed themselves there.

If he was a bad player in relation to the women, then okay. I wasn’t convinced of that.


55 posted on 05/23/2017 3:03:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Vlad The Inhaler

That 9pm show with the five people sitting around a table is so awful. It’s a shame because Hannity @10pm suffers.


56 posted on 05/23/2017 3:04:12 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

It’s funny because Fox may try to blame the left, but what I’ve heard is that conservatives have thought they have gone too far left. I don’t watch a lot of Fox. I like Tucker and Hannity - I don’t watch every night, though. I have read Murdoch’s liberal sons are trying to make it into another leftwing media outlet. That’s not necessary. Fox News was successful because it was unique and filled a niche not seen before in media. If they go left, conservatives will stop watching, and liberals, who already dislike Fox, will likely not switch over because they already have a multitude of media outlets to choose from. CNN and NBC already provide 97% negative coverage of the President. There would be no reason for liberals to switch to Fox when their needs are already being met.

By the way, CNN is a disgrace to journalism. That is all.


57 posted on 05/23/2017 3:15:59 PM PDT by Pinkbell (Hillary's Russia Ties - http://dtforpres.blogspot.com/2016/09/hillary-clinton-and-democrats-have.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

The only newscast I watch. I do watch Tucker on YouTube, listen to Hannity on radio, but the channel is crap to me.


58 posted on 05/23/2017 3:32:11 PM PDT by 1scrappymom (No, I am not a Republican. I am a CONSERVATIVE. PROUD ARMY MOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 1scrappymom

.
>> “I do watch Tucker on YouTube” <<

LOL!

Since ROKU came along we never see regular TV channels.
.


59 posted on 05/23/2017 3:35:05 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I think Martha McCallum is a decent reporter, reasonably conservative, but I don’t think she has the charisma to carry a whole hour. I don’t dislike her, I just think she’s not a ratings magnet.


60 posted on 05/23/2017 3:58:35 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson